As a recipient of Social Security I think I'm probably entitled to an opinion. I've paid into Social Security all my working life and in one respect don't feel too bad about getting back a small portion of what I put in.
This social program was instituted by FDR (D/Progressive) to care for people in their old age. Over the decades all employees have had a SS/Medicare deduction taken out of their gross pay and the employer makes (I think) a matching contribution for each employee. Medicare is a medical subsidy that works hand in hand with Social Security. SS recipients have a premium deduction right off the top of their SS payment and Medicare doesn't pay that much or cover all situations. Thus, the so-called "gap insurance" - for which SS recipients pay an insurance premium to cover what isn't covered by Medicare.
In very simple terms, there are several factors playing into this program. "Tomorrow" is always a long way off and, unfortunately, Congress has borrowed great sums out of the SS Pool to fund this, that or the other thing ... because they could get it all repaid before "tomorrow" got here. Well, "tomorrow" is here and the funds have not been repaid so we're now faced with a social program that's just about busted. Another factor is the much longer life expectancy of older people. Another factor is that after WWII ended and soldiers returned, babies started popping out all over the place - thus the "Boomers." Well the Boomers grew up and a good number of them had to have these awesome jobs and show those men that, by God, these women were smart. (Of course they always were, but that's another story.) They wanted jobs instead of families - didn't need any babies standing in the way of their awesome career goals. (It also led to the cry of women's choice of what they could do with their bodies and abortions, etc. - still another story). Now the mass of Boomers that sprang up are reaching retirement age, but because they opted to not have children, the work force that is expected to fund SS is much smaller than the mass of Boomers.
I think Social Security should be phased out. It will take awhile and government may still have to support the program for awhile, but I think it can ultimately be phased out.
Why can't employees be mandated to open a retirement account with the bank of their choice into which their employer makes a "retirement fund" payment out of the employee's check and to which the employer makes a matching contribution (just as is done now, except that the money would would go into the employee's private retirement fund and not to the government). Employees should be able to make additional contributions to their "retirement account" if they wish. The employee would own his or her retirement account and could direct the bank how to invest their money, but be restricted on what they can or cannot take out of the retirement account - just like most employer owned IRAs or 401(k) plans require. You can't remove funds because you saw a fancy car you want or for a super vacation - but you can BORROW for a medical emergency or a stated amount for a down payment on a first home. The bank could inform the employer of the loan repayment amount and the employer would deduct the loan payment off the gross pay of the employee - just as they do if an employee borrows money from an employer-sponsored plan. The employee could leave the money where it is, or if they make a move from Cincinnati to LA they could open up a new bank account and have the original bank make a direct rollover to a new account and the new employer could make the proper payroll deductions to the new account.
Instead of the government making or not making good investments, the employee could direct the bank how to invest or just let the bank invest as they see fit. The money adds up over an employee's working life and the government has no control whatsoever over the retirement fund. The government could defer any taxes on the account until payments start being distributed to the now retired person. Social Security phases completely out, people have themselves prepared for their own retirement and don't owe the government a damned thing except may deferred taxes.
I'm not a mathematician, but it seems a lot better than taking chances with government waste, etc.
'Nuff said.