basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,053
- 2,220
- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly. They're punishing the victims twice.Now, I have heard such things in the past. They should be going after the guys assets, not his innocent kids, or even his wife. If they can’t recover from him, then so be it.
Exactly. They're punishing the victims twice.Now, I have heard such things in the past. They should be going after the guys assets, not his innocent kids, or even his wife. If they can’t recover from him, then so be it.
The guy hoodwinked them so they're out "to punish someone". That's the same as a serial killer being found dead and then grabbing on of his cousins and putting him on death row as a substitute to placate an irate prosecuting office.
The guy faked his death to run off with his mistress. He did so to not break his wife’s heart or leave her without income. Wife & daughters had no idea & believed him dead when he never returned from a hunting trip.
Decades later, the shock of the betrayal killed the elderly mother who social security cut a deal with to just pay $10/ month until her death. After she quickly expired, SS changed its minds & tried to stick all the money to the daughters. Mother got $87k. Daughter 1 got $12k. Daughter 2 got $10k.
This is an attempt to force two adults to pay the debt of another adult they aren’t married to. Next will cousins be on the hook for agreements others signed? Friends? Neighbors? And the mother had zero part in the foul play. She was it’s chief victim.
What part of that is wrong? They benefited from his death. Since he was not dead they should not have benefited.
Do you condone someone faking their death then collecting money from an insurance policy?
What about the merchants who took the money from Madoff too? All the stuff he bought? Should they be forced to pay restitution?So Bernie Madoff's son also got thousands on thousands from his father's ponzi scheme, and he had absolute no part in the criminal actions, nor had any knowledge of it.
Would you be cool with him keeping the money?
What about the merchants who took the money from Madoff too? All the stuff he bought? Should they be forced to pay restitution?So Bernie Madoff's son also got thousands on thousands from his father's ponzi scheme, and he had absolute no part in the criminal actions, nor had any knowledge of it.
Would you be cool with him keeping the money?
The guy faked his death to run off with his mistress. He did so to not break his wife’s heart or leave her without income. Wife & daughters had no idea & believed him dead when he never returned from a hunting trip.
Decades later, the shock of the betrayal killed the elderly mother who social security cut a deal with to just pay $10/ month until her death. After she quickly expired, SS changed its minds & tried to stick all the money to the daughters. Mother got $87k. Daughter 1 got $12k. Daughter 2 got $10k.
This is an attempt to force two adults to pay the debt of another adult they aren’t married to. Next will cousins be on the hook for agreements others signed? Friends? Neighbors? And the mother had zero part in the foul play. She was it’s chief victim.
So Bernie Madoff's son also got thousands on thousands from his father's ponzi scheme, and he had absolute no part in the criminal actions, nor had any knowledge of it.
Would you be cool with him keeping the money?
Unless they have some convincing evidence that they were in in it this is bullshit.
they knew they would lose in court....I am glad the Social Security Administration changed their foolish position on this matter. Wether this change was a result of bad optics, shame, and/or a genuine reversal doesn’t matter really so long as they backed off.