Ravi
Diamond Member
If I'm understanding your story properly it sounds as if the waitress had good intentions, i.e. not sticking one coworker with the bill for the husband. None of her business, of course, but in the overall scheme of things not a killing offense.
Yeah, she had no malicious intent at all, but had a sort of goofy-loosey attitude about other peoples money.
I think that is why it seems most of the liberals on this thread are saying that they would have paid.
I think the person that wasn't paying for the coworker's husband was a cheapskate for not offering to split that cost, too.
If not being a cheapskate is a liberal failing to you I am all