Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
If there is a Nobel Prize for dodging questions, you're a shoe-in. As long as FBI officials are ineligible.damm! im pushing 300 replies! so will i win a Nobel Peace Prize when I hit 500 replies?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If there is a Nobel Prize for dodging questions, you're a shoe-in. As long as FBI officials are ineligible.damm! im pushing 300 replies! so will i win a Nobel Peace Prize when I hit 500 replies?
No. That is the silly propaganda you republicans soak up like a sponge.
Exactly and that is what they are finding.
Under the constitution they cannot form a verdict and are obliged to pass the information they have to the doj.
Absolutely not. Not one democrat was involved in the riots.
There will be no other people on trial. That statement basically confirms it’s not a witch hunt as you said.
Trump orchestrated an attempted takeover of democracy and must be held accountable the same as you would want if he were a democrat. So let’s leave the hypocrisy out of it.
Trumps deeds if proven will sink himself, not the enquiry alone. .
No. That is the silly propaganda you republicans soak up like a sponge.
Exactly and that is what they are finding.
Under the constitution they cannot form a verdict and are obliged to pass the information they have to the doj.
No. That is the silly propaganda you republicans soak up like a sponge.
Exactly and that is what they are finding.
Under the constitution they cannot form a verdict and are obliged to pass the information they have to the doj.
Absolutely not. Not one democrat was involved in the riots.
There will be no other people on trial. That statement basically confirms it’s not a witch hunt as you said.
Trump orchestrated an attempted takeover of democracy and must be held accountable the same as you would want if he were a democrat. So let’s leave the hypocrisy out of it.
Trumps deeds if proven will sink himself, not the enquiry alone. .
Absolutely not. Not one democrat was involved in the riots.
No. That is the silly propaganda you republicans soak up like a sponge.
Exactly and that is what they are finding.
Under the constitution they cannot form a verdict and are obliged to pass the information they have to the doj.
Absolutely not. Not one democrat was involved in the riots.
There will be no other people on trial. That statement basically confirms it’s not a witch hunt as you said.
Trump orchestrated an attempted takeover of democracy and must be held accountable the same as you would want if he were a democrat. So let’s leave the hypocrisy out of it.
Trumps deeds if proven will sink himself, not the enquiry alone. .
There will be no other people on trial. That statement basically confirms it’s not a witch hunt as you said.
These leftards need to be investigated, then taken apart and removed.No, that's what you call a one sided investigation with the stated goal of harming someone.
How do you it's the truth. You've not heard anyone else's side if things. You've not heard any opposing witnesses. You say it's the truth because your hatred of trump and the republican party makes you uninterested in hearing any other version. In your mind, it's case closed, no need for any defense, let's send him to prison!
Agreed, which is why I say let's wait until we hear a defense. However, that doesn't mean the committee hasn't been engaged in a one sided witch hunt. Also, there is public opinion, which is about 70% of this whole thing. Even if they don't get the verdict they want, they have still done damage to trump.
I was listening to signorile the other day, I listen to him often, because it's good to know what the other side is thinking. This guy is HARD CORE anti trump progressive. He had a guest on the other day who said he thinks the committee isn't even going to make a doj referral. They will just writs their report, and if the doj wants to pick it up, they can. Now, that is very telling, coming from someone on this radio show.
Either he thinks they don't have enough to refer, it, their goal was never a trial, only to tarnish his reputation.
Time will tell. I'm eager to get this all going.
Those magical non existent existent nuclear documents.We could make quite a list of issues/facts/possible scandals that President Trump will tell the world if he was to be supeeened on for a billion or so to watch.
So Gee, Hmm, what could they be?
There aren't any current Democrat Scandals going on right now? yes?![]()
This is about it, huh. Accusing others of your own personality defects. Pitiful creature.Go your hardest son. You’re as ignorant as a row of cats watching tv.
I’ll do you slowly purely to provide entertainment for everyone.
I’ve got one simple attribute you don’t have. I’ve got intelligence. To this point all you have displayed is narcissism and ego and a big mouth.
Have a nice day. I am.
You started it now your backing out.This is about it, huh. Accusing others of your own personality defects. Pitiful creature.
When did trumps lawyers testify or got called?I didn't say there were, the other people I referring to are trumps lawyers and other witnesses that they call.
I don’t care but I thought you might like to be reminded of it.That wasn't even related to what I wrote.
All selected by the committee whose agenda is to hurt trump. I'm sure there are other witnesses who would refute those things. Kinda like the limo drivers that day who trump allegedly lunged at. I've heard they are ready to testify that that didn't happen. Why hasn't the committee called them?
No, that's what you call a one sided investigation with the stated goal of harming someone.
How do you it's the truth. You've not heard anyone else's side if things. You've not heard any opposing witnesses. You say it's the truth because your hatred of trump and the republican party makes you uninterested in hearing any other version. In your mind, it's case closed, no need for any defense, let's send him to prison!
Agreed, which is why I say let's wait until we hear a defense. However, that doesn't mean the committee hasn't been engaged in a one sided witch hunt. Also, there is public opinion, which is about 70% of this whole thing. Even if they don't get the verdict they want, they have still done damage to trump.
I was listening to signorile the other day, I listen to him often, because it's good to know what the other side is thinking. This guy is HARD CORE anti trump progressive. He had a guest on the other day who said he thinks the committee isn't even going to make a doj referral. They will just writs their report, and if the doj wants to pick it up, they can. Now, that is very telling, coming from someone on this radio show.
Either he thinks they don't have enough to refer, it, their goal was never a trial, only to tarnish his reputation.
Time will tell. I'm eager to get this all going.
Give me a situation where it would look good for Trump.If it looks bad for trump, you have to remember, it was mostly trump aids, supporters and associates testifying and giving evidence.
As far as I know, the committee has no power of punishment of Donald Trump, only the power to investigate, though evidence and recommendations could be made to the Department of Justice, possibly leading to prosecution, that ball bouncing in somebody else's court or responsibility.
There you go again, accusing me of what you did. Wanna get on to the issues? Poor thing.You started it now your backing out.
Come on. Keep going.
Trump, Trump and Trump. The people are going to send you losers a loud message soon.The agenda was to find out what happened. How it was planned and who was involved. And how to prevent it from ever happening again.
The secret service driver quit the secret service rather than coming in to testify. He went to work for Donald Trump. But he did not ever publically contradict that story.
Trump doesn't have a reputation to "tarnish" other than as a liar, an incompetent, and financial wrecking ball.
Wow. A talking head on a radio show, whose name you don't remember, is believed.
Trump accusers aren't Democrats. They're all Republicans and they're all people he hired. Most of them quit in disgust after January 6th. Even Bill Barr, who sucked up to Trump and carried out every sleazy corrupt order Trump gave, quit over Trump's refusal to transfer power.
Ok let’s do that.There you go again, accusing me of what you did. Wanna get on to the issues? Poor thing.
He certainly is. It will be his confirmation of his guilt. He will never go to jail unless the doj have grown balls.Trump, Trump and Trump. The people are going to send you losers a loud message soon.
If Trump was a narcissistic dictator he'd still be in office or removed by force. Neither of those events occurred. Therefore, you're wrong. Keep going.Ok let’s do that.
I think trump is a narcissist sociopath and is guilty of orchestrating the j6 riots to install himself as a fascist dictator.
See how you go with that for starters.
The agenda was to find out what happened. How it was planned and who was involved. And how to prevent it from ever happening again.
Trump doesn't have a reputation to "tarnish" other than as a liar, an incompetent, and financial wrecking ball.
Trump accusers aren't Democrats.
Plenty of people misread the political winds. Maybe Barr is one of them.They're all Republicans and they're all people he hired. Most of them quit in disgust after January 6th. Even Bill Barr, who sucked up to Trump and carried out every sleazy corrupt order Trump gave, quit over Trump's refusal to transfer power.
He isn't going to jail because he hasn't committed a crime. Joe Biden and his son have.He certainly is. It will be his confirmation of his guilt. He will never go to jail unless the doj have grown balls.
The big pos will well away and chortle about it.
You mean he had been found guilty yet.He isn't going to jail because he hasn't committed a crime. Joe Biden and his son have.