So when representives from 190 countries come together on an agreement on climate change...

[bripat9643]

] It's irrelevant to what's happening today. Just because something was true in the past, doesn't necessarily make it a good thing now

The laws of physics don't change over time, numskull.

These people think that they can make them change, simply by passing a law.

The laws of physics are always tested, that is the scientific method. Once the earth was thought to be the center of the Universe. So the laws we know today may not be the laws a decade or a millennium into the future.

Thus the perception of physics changes over time.

No one knows THE TRUTH!

Konradv thinks the laws of physics 10 million years ago weren't the same as they are today. No one was around to test them in those days.

 

[whitehall]

Why do you think the 190 countries (and the American left) care about whether or not republicans support the theory of global warming? Probably because they know that Hillary's chances are a joke and GW is a perfect venue for extorting money from good old Uncle Sam and they don't want to lose it. We tried freaking migratory bird killing windmills and acres of ugly expensive solar panels and even taxpayer support for a company that sells electric cars at 80 grand a pop that almost nobody but the elites can afford. In the end we found out the world still runs on fossil fuel and other countries are gobbling it up. A kid in grade school used to be able to tell you "it's the sun, stupid" although the brainwashing is almost complete today. There are a thousand ways that the world can be kicked into an ice age including mega earthquakes and the sun's fluctuations. Nobody even thought of global warming until a disgruntled hypocrite political loser with no scientific background decided to punish Americans for not voting for him and make a buck selling energy futures. The left wing lives on crisis and anger and hate-America propaganda and the theory of GW was made to order.

 

[Campbell]

you are so full of demoratscum propaganda shit it seems unbelievable to even some of your own low info demotards.

it is cold and raining here, will you please change my climate to warm and sunny?? ....

Poor baby, it's cloudy and 78 here. It was 85 yesterday, but cooler temps and rain are due in tonight.

CO2 makes up .039% of the atmosphere. Nice chartsmanship, but its bullshit. Do understand what PPM ( parts per million) means. Do you understand that going from 250 to 300 PPM is a tiny change? The reality is that CO2 cannot be accurately measured to the level of detail.

The whole AGW cult is bullshit.

Not if you're dealing with poisonous chemicals it's not. Yes....250-300ppm is a miniscule amount but we're talking about the entire atmosphere.

You might want to read your post again objectively and try to realize exactly how stupid you sound. Minuscule is minuscule no matter the quantity in question.

If you're dealing with poisonous chemicals it's not:

Concentration Symptoms of Hydrogen Sulfide(for example)

5-9 ppm Increased blood lactate concentration, decreased skeletal muscle citrate synthase activity

0-10 ppm Irritation of eyes, nose, and throat.

20 ppm Bronchial constriction in asthmatic individuals, spontaneous abortion

10-50 ppm Headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, coughing, difficulty breathing

50-200 ppm Severe respiratory tract irritation, eye irritation/acute conjunctivitis, shock, convulsions, coma and death in severe cases

If one works with poisonous chemicals appropriate handing procedures are adhered to.....I used to do it for a living(no pun intended)

 

[Wry Catcher]

It's not how intelligence I think I am, it's all relative to your ignorance and foolish disregard for the science.

The question isn't how intelligent you are but it is a question about the faith you have in what people tell you.

I have faith in the scientific community, and the visual cues like these

Google

q=photos+of+the+effect+of+the+seas+warming&espv=2&biw=1164&bih=810&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjG4ufb0tbJAhUL7mMKHQxMDaYQ7AkIMA#imgrc=4YAIez5_LSL7pM%3A

and articles like this:

Sea Temperature Rise -- Pristine Seas -- National Geographic

Nothing posted by the deniers carries facts, photos or credible evidence to even wonder if climate change is not happening and if human activity is not a least partly responsible.

It appears you're a sucker for brightly colored posters. Yes, you do have "faith" in the so-called scientists. That's all it is, faith. You aren't capable of considering two opposing arguments and using facts and logic to determine which is more likely to be correct. You're an obedient little drone who believes whatever the Party tells you to believe.

There is NO opposing argument on the fact that the climate is changing. The argument, if you want to call it that, from your side is not based on evidence (in your case and the case of many others it is based on stupidity).

The only dispute is whether the changing climate is caused by human interaction (which fools deny) or naturally occurring events.

I haven't argued that the changes are all the result of humanity, but the evidence I've read from scientific community has convinced me some or most of the cause are the by products of the Industrial revolution and the destruction of forests - both products of humanity.

It's unfathomable that so many of you right wingers can be so stupid, but I guess that comes with being a right winger.

Maybe you should consider that temps are driving the CO2 instead of the other way round. Temps have moderated and CO2 may follow.

What I've read is that temperatures have risen and will continue to rise; do you have a source to suggest the temp. of the Oceans have moderated?

 

[Wry Catcher]

There is NO opposing argument on the fact that the climate is changing. The argument, if you want to call it that, from your side is not based on evidence (in your case and the case of many others it is based on stupidity).

The only dispute is whether the changing climate is caused by human interaction (which fools deny) or naturally occurring events.

I haven't argued that the changes are all the result of humanity, but the evidence I've read from scientific community has convinced me some or most of the cause are the by products of the Industrial revolution and the destruction of forests - both products of humanity.

It's unfathomable that so many of you right wingers can be so stupid, but I guess that comes with being a right winger.

Se these far left drones actually believe that without humans the climate would never change..

CO2 does not control climate, it never has..

Only a liar would state, "far left drones actually believe that without humans the climate would never change".

But without the ability to lie, the crazy right wing would be struck dumb(er)!

Says the far left drone that voted for Obama twice..

Yes you believe as your religion tells you to believe that climate can not change unless humans are involved..

Mind you there is zero scientific evidence proving that CO2 controls climate..

There is no evidence that you have a clue about much of anything.

But as a good liberal, I'm willing to help, but you need to want the help to bring you out of the fog. Here is some help:

Carbon Dioxide and Climate

One take away is to put aside the claim that for want of grant money the science of global warming is made up.

And proof you are a far left drone!

Correlation does not equal causation, never has..

CO2 does not control climate, never has..

"Global Warming" would happen without humans on the planet..

The entire religion of AGW is based on a myth/computer models:

Since you didn't read the article from Scientific American I linked to above, herein is the final paragraph:

We shall be able to test the carbon dioxide theory against other theories of climatic change quite conclusively during the next half-century. Since we now can measure the sun's energy output independent of the distorting influence of the atmosphere, we shall see whether the earth's temperature trend correlates with measured fluctuations in solar radiation. If volcanic dust is the more important factor, then we may observe the earth's temperature following fluctuations in the number of large volcanic eruptions. But if carbon dioxide is the most important factor, long-term temperature records will rise continuously as long as man consumes the earth's reserves of fossil fuels.

This is what the science is about, you and the other assholes who pretend to know the truth as told by Limbaugh, Murdoc an Koch remain full of shit.

 

[Kosh]

Se these far left drones actually believe that without humans the climate would never change..

CO2 does not control climate, it never has..

Only a liar would state, "far left drones actually believe that without humans the climate would never change".

But without the ability to lie, the crazy right wing would be struck dumb(er)!

Says the far left drone that voted for Obama twice..

Yes you believe as your religion tells you to believe that climate can not change unless humans are involved..

Mind you there is zero scientific evidence proving that CO2 controls climate..

There is no evidence that you have a clue about much of anything.

But as a good liberal, I'm willing to help, but you need to want the help to bring you out of the fog. Here is some help:

Carbon Dioxide and Climate

One take away is to put aside the claim that for want of grant money the science of global warming is made up.

And proof you are a far left drone!

Correlation does not equal causation, never has..

CO2 does not control climate, never has..

"Global Warming" would happen without humans on the planet..

The entire religion of AGW is based on a myth/computer models:

Since you didn't read the article from Scientific American I linked to above, herein is the final paragraph:

We shall be able to test the carbon dioxide theory against other theories of climatic change quite conclusively during the next half-century. Since we now can measure the sun's energy output independent of the distorting influence of the atmosphere, we shall see whether the earth's temperature trend correlates with measured fluctuations in solar radiation. If volcanic dust is the more important factor, then we may observe the earth's temperature following fluctuations in the number of large volcanic eruptions. But if carbon dioxide is the most important factor, long-term temperature records will rise continuously as long as man consumes the earth's reserves of fossil fuels.

This is what the science is about, you and the other assholes who pretend to know the truth as told by Limbaugh, Murdoc an Koch remain full of shit.

And right on cue to run the far left narrative without question or hesitation..

Still zero scientific proof that CO2 drives climate, just a religious narrative..

 

[Redfish]

The destruction of the liberfools in this thread is complete. Facts always defeat liberals, that's why they ignore or run from them whenever presented.

If the libs want a real cause, take on pollution, but don't do it with an unproven link to global climate.

The only reason to link pollution to climate is to enable governments to take money from their citizens and control the behavior of their citizens. Hitler, Marx, and Mao would be proud of you liberfucks.

 

[Theowl32]

Has a liberal (pawns of their socialists) even attempted to explain to us why China or other countries are not a part of this? Since they are such producers of carbon emissions and polution, explain to all of us why it is so ok with the world if in fact we are being so destroyed by this so called dire situation.

 

[Campbell]

The destruction of the liberfools in this thread is complete. Facts always defeat liberals, that's why they ignore or run from them whenever presented.

If the libs want a real cause, take on pollution, but don't do it with an unproven link to global climate.

The only reason to link pollution to climate is to enable governments to take money from their citizens and control the behavior of their citizens. Hitler, Marx, and Mao would be proud of you liberfucks.

You pricks are just like George W. Bush......You wouldn't know a fact from a jackrabbit:

 

[Theowl32]

The destruction of the liberfools in this thread is complete. Facts always defeat liberals, that's why they ignore or run from them whenever presented.

If the libs want a real cause, take on pollution, but don't do it with an unproven link to global climate.

The only reason to link pollution to climate is to enable governments to take money from their citizens and control the behavior of their citizens. Hitler, Marx, and Mao would be proud of you liberfucks.

You pricks are just like George W. Bush......You wouldn't know a fact from a jackrabbit:

Do you know republicans took over the house and Senate? Do you know what years they started to take over?

Did, did you know that?

Did, did you know democrats took over the house and Senate in 2007?

Did, did you see how that deficit reacted under those situations?


Hmmmmmm?

 

[Wyatt earp]

The destruction of the liberfools in this thread is complete. Facts always defeat liberals, that's why they ignore or run from them whenever presented.

If the libs want a real cause, take on pollution, but don't do it with an unproven link to global climate.

The only reason to link pollution to climate is to enable governments to take money from their citizens and control the behavior of their citizens. Hitler, Marx, and Mao would be proud of you liberfucks.

You pricks are just like George W. Bush......You wouldn't know a fact from a jackrabbit:

Do you know republicans took over the house and Senate? Do you know what years they started to take over?

Did, did you know that?

Did, did you knoe democrats took over the house and Senate in 2007?

Did, did you see how that deficit reacted under those situations?


Hmmmmmm?

That's to confusing for him

 

[Rustic]

Algore

 

[Campbell]

The destruction of the liberfools in this thread is complete. Facts always defeat liberals, that's why they ignore or run from them whenever presented.

If the libs want a real cause, take on pollution, but don't do it with an unproven link to global climate.

The only reason to link pollution to climate is to enable governments to take money from their citizens and control the behavior of their citizens. Hitler, Marx, and Mao would be proud of you liberfucks.

You pricks are just like George W. Bush......You wouldn't know a fact from a jackrabbit:

Do you know republicans took over the house and Senate? Do you know what years they started to take over?

Did, did you know that?

Did, did you knoe democrats took over the house and Senate in 2007?

Did, did you see how that deficit reacted under those situations?


Hmmmmmm?

Bull and Horse Shit!!!!
I was a Republican the first thirty years I voted. Eisenhower, Goldwater, Nixon three times....even Reagan the first time. Then I went twenty years and didn't even show up at the polls. I've voted Democrat three times during my 81 years on this planet but there's one thing you can bet your ass on. I'll never vote for a party again whose only support goes to the rich and big business. That's all the Republicans have been since
Ronald Reagan.....tax cutting, war mongering debtors....one helluva record:

.......................................................Total U S Debt.......................................................

09/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32
09/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89
09/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15
09/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Bill Clinton Raised Tax Rates)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)(Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[Harry Dresden]

...I can't help but feel embarrassed for republicans and their denial of AGW. Apparently the global summit and the world wide scientific consensus on climate change isn't enough for them to be mature enough to admit they have been wrong all along. I mean it's pretty pathetic that average joe republicans believe it to be a myth just because their republican officials and rightwing bullshit media like Fox News tells them it is.

Climate negotiators say global deal is close in Paris

190 countries and 97% of scientists vs Republicans and big oil

I wonder who will win?

big oil.....

 

[9thIDdoc]

You repubs are such egocentric toddlers. You think the world should come together to fix the US's problems? Are our problems more important than other nation's problems?

They are certainly are to me. Global warming remains a scam.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Only a liar would state, "far left drones actually believe that without humans the climate would never change".

But without the ability to lie, the crazy right wing would be struck dumb(er)!

Says the far left drone that voted for Obama twice..

Yes you believe as your religion tells you to believe that climate can not change unless humans are involved..

Mind you there is zero scientific evidence proving that CO2 controls climate..

There is no evidence that you have a clue about much of anything.

But as a good liberal, I'm willing to help, but you need to want the help to bring you out of the fog. Here is some help:

Carbon Dioxide and Climate

One take away is to put aside the claim that for want of grant money the science of global warming is made up.

And proof you are a far left drone!

Correlation does not equal causation, never has..

CO2 does not control climate, never has..

"Global Warming" would happen without humans on the planet..

The entire religion of AGW is based on a myth/computer models:

Since you didn't read the article from Scientific American I linked to above, herein is the final paragraph:

We shall be able to test the carbon dioxide theory against other theories of climatic change quite conclusively during the next half-century. Since we now can measure the sun's energy output independent of the distorting influence of the atmosphere, we shall see whether the earth's temperature trend correlates with measured fluctuations in solar radiation. If volcanic dust is the more important factor, then we may observe the earth's temperature following fluctuations in the number of large volcanic eruptions. But if carbon dioxide is the most important factor, long-term temperature records will rise continuously as long as man consumes the earth's reserves of fossil fuels.

This is what the science is about, you and the other assholes who pretend to know the truth as told by Limbaugh, Murdoc an Koch remain full of shit.

And right on cue to run the far left narrative without question or hesitation..

Still zero scientific proof that CO2 drives climate, just a religious narrative..

There is no evidence you're not mentally retarded, in fact there is plenty to determine you are. You and the other fools continue to post your opinions, with the occasional blog by someone with no credentials who echoes the same bullshit / propaganda of the oil and coal producers.

I've posted enough evidence to evoke the curiosity of a child, and still you and the other fools continue to post ad hominems, sans any evidence to prove human activity has no impact on the worlds climate.

Are you as stupid as you appear to be, or simply a liar who benefits from and puts your greed before our progeny?

 

[Wry Catcher]

You repubs are such egocentric toddlers. You think the world should come together to fix the US's problems? Are our problems more important than other nation's problems?

They are certainly are to me. Global warming remains a scam.

Once again an opinion sans any evidence whatsoever.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The destruction of the liberfools in this thread is complete. Facts always defeat liberals, that's why they ignore or run from them whenever presented.

If the libs want a real cause, take on pollution, but don't do it with an unproven link to global climate.

The only reason to link pollution to climate is to enable governments to take money from their citizens and control the behavior of their citizens. Hitler, Marx, and Mao would be proud of you liberfucks.

You pricks are just like George W. Bush......You wouldn't know a fact from a jackrabbit:

Do you know republicans took over the house and Senate? Do you know what years they started to take over?

Did, did you know that?

Did, did you know democrats took over the house and Senate in 2007?

Did, did you see how that deficit reacted under those situations?


Hmmmmmm?

Appeal to ignorance ^^^!

 

[9thIDdoc]

You repubs are such egocentric toddlers. You think the world should come together to fix the US's problems? Are our problems more important than other nation's problems?

They are certainly are to me. Global warming remains a scam.

Once again an opinion sans any evidence whatsoever.

True and stated as such. And "Global Warming" remains an unproven theory used as an excuse to bilk the American taxpayer.(also an opinion).

 

[Wry Catcher]

You repubs are such egocentric toddlers. You think the world should come together to fix the US's problems? Are our problems more important than other nation's problems?

They are certainly are to me. Global warming remains a scam.

Once again an opinion sans any evidence whatsoever.

True and stated as such. And "Global Warming" remains an unproven theory used as an excuse to bilk the American taxpayer.(also an opinion).

A very biased opinion and a myopic one.