So, What Was The Bottom Line To The Chat Group Security Flub?

There's a difference between wanting one and having one, we have one that is more than competent. You're welcome to your opinion, as I said earlier, no one gives a fuck what it is. :dunno:
You think this incident illustrates competence??

Really??
 
Bullshit. No one is doing anything like that.

They’re circling the wagons and trying to tough it out and you know that.

In fact you’re cheerleading that
Naturally they are circling the wagons as you threaten them with being massacred

Anyone in Washington would
 
You are still bitter about Hillary, while we were still bitter about a Navy sailor who went to Leavenworth for far less than what she did
The story about the sailor is and always has been a lie. I’m sure it’s been explained to you before but you’re not using your own common sense.

Explain how Hegseth could complain about Clinton so much but be outraged that anyone suggest discussing military attack plans on Signal isn’t just fine.
it alerted our enemies to possible leaks theay can mine for info

Or do you not believe your own rant about comsec?
So you’re saying that using signal is a potential weak point to he exploited by our enemies? That just confirms that this was never “allowed” in the first place.
 
Naturally they are circling the wagons as you threaten them with being massacred

Anyone in Washington would
Getting rid of incompetent morons is not “massacre”
 
If all you care about is killing the king then by all means give it your best shot
You’ll defend him to the end of time, no matter how foolish it makes you look.
 
It's the mess you voted for. Get used to more stupid shit. This isn't the last of it.
I know. I wish Biden were still in charge. He was in such control and never did anything weird or stupid.
 
in what way was the king disparaged in this situation?
If I stick my forefinger up your ass and detect a mass---
should I publish the fact on the super-market billboard?
Well, half of his cabinet looks like a bunch of morons and he has to try to convince America otherwise.

Why shouldn’t the public know about this story?
 
Explain how Hegseth could complain about Clinton so much but be outraged that anyone suggest discussing military attack plans on Signal isn’t just fine.
It was ill advised depending on what was said

But certainly not a hanging offense as you want it to be
 
You think this incident illustrates competence??

Really??

I think you and other incels like you are making a mountain out of a molehill, like you always do. And we don't know the details of how this happened to make any judgement call. Waltz said he did not have the 'journalist' as a contact and I believe him, why would he? They need to investigate and get to the bottom of how he was added. And I noticed you completely ignored my comments on the culpability of said 'journalist' and his part in letting it continue for days. And that's because you really don't care, you only care about bashing the Trump admin. You know, I know it, we all know it. The administration has already spoken on the topic and taken responsibility for it, but that's not good enough for you. I guess that's just tough shit, cause you aren't in charge and your opinion is meaningless. :cool:
 
You’ll defend him to the end of time, no matter how foolish it makes you look.
If what we know so far is all you have then I will defend as long as you attack
 
Well, the flub did not get 13 service members killed like Biden did so fire the staffer responsible, learn from it, and move on.
It wouldn't seem so bad if that is what they did. Instead, they re lying and saying nothing was wrong with what they did. They are trying to claim nothing they said should have been kept secret. Then they tried to blame the reporter who they invited to the conversation.
 
I think you and other incels like you are making a mountain out of a molehill, like you always do. And we don't know the details of how this happened to make any judgement call. Waltz said he did not have the 'journalist' as a contact and I believe him, why would he? They need to investigate and get to the bottom of how he was added. And I noticed you completely ignored my comments on the culpability of said 'journalist' and his part in letting it continue for days. And that's because you really don't care, you only care about bashing the Trump admin. You know, I know it, we all know it. The administration has already spoken on the topic and taken responsibility for it, but that's not good enough for you. I guess that's just tough shit, cause you aren't in charge and your opinion is meaningless. :cool:
You’re just spewing words. All of it is “ just something to say”

Incel? Yeah. A seventy year old man with two kids and a 45 year marriage is an incel. Sure

You started with that stupidity and it got worse


All just “something to say”
 
And I noticed you completely ignored my comments on the culpability of said 'journalist' and his part in letting it continue for days.
Thats a problem for the libs

If the alleged “security breach” was so damaging, and the lib journalist was soooo patriotic, why did he wait one or two weeks to tell us about it?
 
You’re just spewing words. All of it is “ just something to say”

Incel? Yeah. A seventy year old man with two kids and a 45 year marriage is an incel. Sure

You started with that stupidity and it got worse


All just “something to say”

Ah, so you're a hippy, explains a lot. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Back
Top Bottom