So Trump wants to send the National Guard to Chicago, New York, Detroit and Baltimore but the democratic leaders are pushing back

[Robert W]

Thanks for sharing that link with me. I was starting to feel like I was the only one here seeing what's happening in a different way...but you and I are in a very tiny minority around

Did you read all of the article?
The ending says all is not lost.
It discussed the deep state just as Trump is doing. Trump has cut back 30 regulations for every new regulation put in. He is hammering the deep state.
But the battlefield is not lost—not yet.

As I stress in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, the first step in resisting tyranny is recognizing its tools: fear, deception, division, and control.

We must reject the Deep State’s mind games in order to reclaim sovereignty over our mental space and remind the government that “we the people” are not puppets to be manipulated or threats to be neutralized.

We are the rightful rulers of a free republic, and that starts with the right to think for ourselves.

Reprinted with permission from the Rutherford Institute.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I believe that the beautification projects even if they include cleaning up debris and trash before the beautification can start, are a very valid way to reduce crime in the district of columbia.

I'm sure that most of us have heard of the "broken windows effect." If not, common sense tells you that people are not going to commit to community policing and
other measures to improve safety and reduced crime, if their neighborhoods are allowed to be trash-filled areas of urban squalor.

If DC's crime were still as high as it was under the municipal leadership, prior to federal intervention, then of course, those guardsmen should be on patrol to deter crime.

At 12:25 AM yesterday DC recorded its first homicide in almost two weeks. if that rate begins to rise to pretrump levels then i'm sure the priorities will once again be violent crime.

There is absolutely no law that prevents the president from taking these actions. Arguably, there is an affirmative duty for him to take them.

Who could be angry over a reduced rate of homicide in our nation's capital? The only reasonable answer is no one. But it seems not everyone in politics is reasonable.