In some places, true. I do think that some Democrat run (supposedly progressive) cities, do, in fact, do a shitty job, are more lenient on criminals, more accepting of crime in certain areas, more prone to sometimes have more violent protests (as if it is a right and license to loot and destroy), more accepting of homeless taking over parks, streets, leaving needless, increasing street crime, etc.
Still, at the same time, it is not the job (except for District of Columbia) nor is it appropriate, that King Don should pull National Guardsmen and Guardswomen from all over the country to usurp local authority, in local cities or states on my dime, as Federal troop are not supposed be used for local law enforcement. Let the locals foot the bill. I simply do not give a shit about the shithole cities. I pay my local taxes so my local and state government do it's job to the extent necessary to keep crime down to a tolerable level. And, I am, of course, heavily armed and highly trained to
stop violent crime in its tracks on my property and set example and act as influence to have people avoid attacks (if they were looking for easy risk free prey, in my immediate neighborhood. In my neighborhood watch days, I was very influential to ladies without a man in the house, to purchase and know how to use a shotgun. Even now years later, some I haven't seen in a while will greet me on the street or in a store, tell me they are glad to see me, Plus, locally, I will not vote for Sheriff, Judge, Mayor or Governor that I measure as being the accepting types, that simply make excuses, be they Republican, Democrat, or in non-party partisan races (locally Mayor). I do not owe the support of my tax dollars for the Federal Government to clean up local city street crime. Or other BS, Donny is using the National Guard for.
Did you see this?
National Guard troops to pick up trash in DC, work on ‘beautification' projects