I won't argue the legalities of what trump is doing. under our system, we never really know what is legal, and what is it? Until the supreme court makes the definitive ruling.
It certainly seems necessary. i cannot envision any honest argument that it is not.
I'm sure I will spin the next three and a half years, reminding people that from twenty sixteen on democrats believe they could do anything they wantes, regardless of the law. they were fully supported, of course, by the the democrats and "not democrats on this forum."
After eight years of lawlessness by democrats in government and tolerance of lawlessness on the street by democrats, donald trump managed to be elected in spite of all the lawfare against him.
Or maybe what democrats should understand is that he got elected in part because of the law, fair against him.
I have to think that if kamala had been elected and was sending natiional guard troops to protect pride marches and protesters attacking crisis pregnancy centers, democrats and "not democrats" on here would be fine with it.