So Trump wants to send the National Guard to Chicago, New York, Detroit and Baltimore but the democratic leaders are pushing back

[jotathought]

Crime is indeed down in these cities.

If you want crime to be reduced, start by removing the convicted felon who is the president.

It's down compared to when?

 

[Cassandro]

More Army troops on US soil since the Civil War

Are you suffering zinc poisoning?

 

[IM2]

It's down compared to when?

Go look.

 

[Seymour Flops]

They should be pushing back, as per the constitution and amendments, Federal troops have no business enforcing lawfare on the public. States should decide when the National Guard is deployed within their borders, for how long, and control their command through the Adjutant General of the state. It is not a presidential deal, to basically declare martial law, send in the Federal Troop and take over law enforcement.

I can sort of understand DC. It is not a state. It is a Federal District. Maryland, Michigan, New York, and Illinois are states with their own rights, not given to the Federal Government.

It is not fair use of the National Guard, either. Pretend you are an E-5 Sergeant in the National Guard. In your civilian job, you make $68,000+/year at a factory, 2 kids in school, two car payments along with your wife and a house payment, along with interest on loans and taxes. Now you are sent to Washington, DC. for 6 months. You drop to pay and allowances of $4,076.40/ month. The government is then digging you a hole, it may be hard to get out of, and you take a hit to your credit rating, simply because some jackoff decided you were free labor to supplement DC, as they do not want to hire enough cops. Active Army was available and those soldiers, already used to the pay rate. For higher enlisted and officers, it can be worse, as many are business owners, even professional people taking a pay cut. So, what do you do. Go bankrupt on the business side? Sure Soldiers and Sailers Relief act, will protect your home and car(s), but your business? Nope. I knew of an officer with a successful dentil clinic and staff with a new facility, who was losing everything, the staff furloughed. He was overseas, nothing he could do about it, stop loss in effect. Lifestyle of his family based on his professional earning over for forceable future. He solved it by putting a bullet through his head, in his tent. Not common, but real.

I won't argue the legalities of what trump is doing. under our system, we never really know what is legal, and what is it? Until the supreme court makes the definitive ruling.

It certainly seems necessary. i cannot envision any honest argument that it is not.

I'm sure I will spin the next three and a half years, reminding people that from twenty sixteen on democrats believe they could do anything they wantes, regardless of the law. they were fully supported, of course, by the the democrats and "not democrats on this forum."

After eight years of lawlessness by democrats in government and tolerance of lawlessness on the street by democrats, donald trump managed to be elected in spite of all the lawfare against him.

Or maybe what democrats should understand is that he got elected in part because of the law, fair against him.

I have to think that if kamala had been elected and was sending national guard troops to protect pride marches and protesters attacking crisis pregnancy centers, democrats and "not democrats" on here would be fine with it.

 

[jotathought]

Go look.

Bwahahaha

 

[Concerned American]

They should be pushing back, as per the constitution and amendments, Federal troops have no business enforcing lawfare on the public. States should decide when the National Guard is deployed within their borders, for how long, and control their command through the Adjutant General of the state. It is not a presidential deal, to basically declare martial law, send in the Federal Troop and take over law enforcement.

I can sort of understand DC. It is not a state. It is a Federal District. Maryland, Michigan, New York, and Illinois are states with their own rights, not given to the Federal Government.

It is not fair use of the National Guard, either. Pretend you are an E-5 Sergeant in the National Guard. In your civilian job, you make $68,000+/year at a factory, 2 kids in school, two car payments along with your wife and a house payment, along with interest on loans and taxes. Now you are sent to Washington, DC. for 6 months. You drop to pay and allowances of $4,076.40/ month. The government is then digging you a hole, it may be hard to get out of, and you take a hit to your credit rating, simply because some jackoff decided you were free labor to supplement DC, as they do not want to hire enough cops. Active Army was available and those soldiers, already used to the pay rate. For higher enlisted and officers, it can be worse, as many are business owners, even professional people taking a pay cut. So, what do you do. Go bankrupt on the business side? Sure Soldiers and Sailers Relief act, will protect your home and car(s), but your business? Nope. I knew of an officer with a successful dentil clinic and staff with a new facility, who was losing everything, the staff furloughed. He was overseas, nothing he could do about it, stop loss in effect. Lifestyle of his family based on his professional earning over for forceable future. He solved it by putting a bullet through his head, in his tent. Not common, but real.

National Guard troops have been deployed more times than you can count, White. You know it. They are there for exactly what their name implies. NATIONAL Guard. They are really the ONLY troops that do have authority to operate within our borders, so dispense with the disingenuous leftist garbage and tell the truth for a change. LOL, you'd think these commie democrat mayors would welcome the help to rid their cities of crime---FREE OF CHARGE. You morons have stepped on a piece of your anatomy and you are twisting like pretzels trying to convince others that your insanity makes sense.

 

[The Duke]

National Guard troops have been deployed more times than you can count, White. You know it. They are there for exactly what their name implies. NATIONAL Guard. They are really the ONLY troops that do have authority to operate within our borders, so dispense with the disingenuous leftist garbage and tell the truth for a change. LOL, you'd think these commie democrat mayors would welcome the help to rid their cities of crime---FREE OF CHARGE. You morons have stepped on a piece of your anatomy and you are twisting like pretzels trying to convince others that your insanity makes sense.

That it needs to happen means the citizens of that city have been paying their taxes and getting ripped off.

 

[Concerned American]

Try to get a grip, before somebody takes you serious, reports you for advocating death threats and hanging public officials.

Like you did for Kathy Griffin? Like that?

 

[White 6]

I won't argue the legalities of what trump is doing. under our system, we never really know what is legal, and what is it? Until the supreme court makes the definitive ruling.

It certainly seems necessary. i cannot envision any honest argument that it is not.

I'm sure I will spin the next three and a half years, reminding people that from twenty sixteen on democrats believe they could do anything they wantes, regardless of the law. they were fully supported, of course, by the the democrats and "not democrats on this forum."

After eight years of lawlessness by democrats in government and tolerance of lawlessness on the street by democrats, donald trump managed to be elected in spite of all the lawfare against him.

Or maybe what democrats should understand is that he got elected in part because of the law, fair against him.

I have to think that if kamala had been elected and was sending national guard troops to protect pride marches and protesters attacking crisis pregnancy centers, democrats and "not democrats" on here would be fine with it.

Crime on the streets is the purview and responsibility of local and state law enforcement, when not talking about Federal crimes.
Are you asking the Federal government to take over law enforcement by the military in your state or just someone else's in a state you do not live in?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

They should be pushing back, as per the constitution and amendments, Federal troops have no business enforcing lawfare on the public. States should decide when the National Guard is deployed within their borders, for how long, and control their command through the Adjutant General of the state. It is not a presidential deal, to basically declare martial law, send in the Federal Troop and take over law enforcement.

I can sort of understand DC. It is not a state. It is a Federal District. Maryland, Michigan, New York, and Illinois are states with their own rights, not given to the Federal Government.

It is not fair use of the National Guard, either. Pretend you are an E-5 Sergeant in the National Guard. In your civilian job, you make $68,000+/year at a factory, 2 kids in school, two car payments along with your wife and a house payment, along with interest on loans and taxes. Now you are sent to Washington, DC. for 6 months. You drop to pay and allowances of $4,076.40/ month. The government is then digging you a hole, it may be hard to get out of, and you take a hit to your credit rating, simply because some jackoff decided you were free labor to supplement DC, as they do not want to hire enough cops. Active Army was available and those soldiers, already used to the pay rate. For higher enlisted and officers, it can be worse, as many are business owners, even professional people taking a pay cut. So, what do you do. Go bankrupt on the business side? Sure Soldiers and Sailers Relief act, will protect your home and car(s), but your business? Nope. I knew of an officer with a successful dentil clinic and staff with a new facility, who was losing everything, the staff furloughed. He was overseas, nothing he could do about it, stop loss in effect. Lifestyle of his family based on his professional earning over for forceable future. He solved it by putting a bullet through his head, in his tent. Not common, but real.

Who said it was 6 months? Oh, you did! Despite the fact it is one month.

Go back and check what other information you just lied about!

 

[White 6]

Who said it was 6 months? Oh, you did! Despite the fact it is one month.

Go back and check what other information you just lied about!

That is informative. So, federal control of law enforcement at local city level ends in a month, and will be fixed?

 

[Concerned American]

Crime on the streets is the purview and responsibility of local and state law enforcement, when not talking about Federal crimes.

Illegal Immigration IS a FEDERAL crime. Did Biden promote you to Col.? I can't imagine anyone else being that stupid. BTW, if you're talking about DC--that is a FEDERAL district--not a state.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

More Army troops on US soil since the Civil War

There are more troops on US soil since Vietnam, the Gulf War, Iraq, and Afghanistan. What does that have to do with anything?

Are you just blabbering to read your own thoughts?

 

[White 6]

Illegal Immigration IS a FEDERAL crime. Did Biden promote you to Col.? I can't imagine anyone else being that stupid. BTW, if you're talking about DC--that is a FEDERAL district--not a state.

You say Trump put federal troops in DC to take on immigration violations?
I didn't even know illegal immigrants had be flocking to Washington, DC.

 

[jackflash]

Because they saying crime is down? Why dont they want the citizens of those cities to be safer? Or they are pushing back because it Trump? They said its constitiutional lol

And no ******* crime is down

The statist left @ current has NOT got a lot of "push" to give. The statist left Mayors/Governors appear to be almost as powerless as the lefty district court justices become when they get humiliated by pres. Trump.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Bah, that was the old ways.
Corruption like that was never tolerated back in the day.
It's treasonous behavior. Local officials have been installed by hostile entities that do not live in the US, but their proxies they funded do, and do their bidding. Absolutely corrupt.

Exactly who would that be?

 

[Concerned American]

You say Trump put federal troops in DC to take on immigration violations?
I didn't even know illegal immigrants had be flocking to Washington, DC.

Read the entire post, moron. DC is a FEDERAL district--don't you know the difference between that and a state? SMFH. No wonder this country has devolved to its current state. Trump has his work cut out for him when a senior military officer is as ignorant as you are.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That is informative. So, federal control of law enforcement at local city level ends in a month, and will be fixed?

If it is not, Congress can vote to extend it. I thought you used to be in the Army? Is that all a charade on your part? You should know this stuff!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Read the entire post, moron. DC is a FEDERAL district--don't you know the difference between that and a state? SMFH. No wonder this country has devolved to its current state. Trump has his work cut out for him when a senior military officer is as ignorant as you are.

Senior military officer?

Based on the way he talks, he probably never made it past E-6, hence the 6 in his username.

 

[Rocko]

I approve of Trump doing this. I don’t know how one could be against fighting crime.