So, the Declaration of “Independence” was for whites only...

Billiejeens

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
8,152
Reaction score
2,931
Points
290
To the extent CNN's lying ass still believes that the founders did not intend that all men being created equally really meant ALL MEN, here is the handwritten manuscript from Thomas Jefferson:

View attachment 360593
Notice how he wrote that.

"...the Christian king of Great Britain determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold..."

It would follow that all MEN (including black men) being created equally is the EXACT intent of the Declaration from THOMAS JEFFERSON himself.

Yeah, Leftists can not do the compare and contrast thingy - or the thing where if this is that, that must be this.
Too much work
 

BS Filter

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2018
Messages
12,989
Reaction score
2,756
Points
290
Actually the Declaration was wrote for wealthy white men, and no one else. They treated women like crap, along with the poor, blacks and Native Americans. Same with the Constitution.
The USA has led the world in granting freedom and liberty. Thousands of white men died to free black people. White men supported granting the women's vote. You're biased.
 

Agit8r

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2010
Messages
10,432
Reaction score
1,361
Points
245
Clearly the Natives were running their own societies at the time. Some did have alliances with the British Crown, who recognized the area boyond the Western boundary as their jurisdiction. The British Americans, however, had encouraged settlement beyond that boundary, including through land speculation companies. The Natives understood the settlers (many of whom had been tricked by the colonial elite) to be tresspassers, and retaliated, which is why they are mentioned so unkindly in the Declaration. Milestones: 1750–1775 - Office of the Historian
 

B. Kidd

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
23,324
Reaction score
5,663
Points
280
Location
Western Lands
This is the argument of the radical left, wanting to tear down every symbol and statue of the Founding Fathers and of our Independence. That, as CNN puts it, the Declaration of “Independence” (they put that in quotes now), didn’t apply to blacks or natives.

My question to you America hating BLM types is, why should had the white people from Europe built a free nation for Africans? Or for the Natives? Or for the Chinese for that matter? Most of the people in the colonies considered themselves English in heritage, if not nationality. They were after all building and expanding colonies for the British and the crown. They had their rights as citizens diminished and stripped, that’s all they really wanted at first, was their rights back and representation. People who weren’t ever British citizens to begin with, probably didn’t care much.

It’s stupid to think that these people of English and European descent would fight to make a free nation for Natives, Africans, or anyone else but themselves. A people and culture are defined by their language, values, and religion. It’s funny how BLM types like morons on this board feel that Africans were entitled to the benefits of these white people fighting a war for independence. Why couldn’t the Africans build their own free nation somewhere? Oh I know, they couldn’t build ships to sail to the Western Hemisphere to start any colonies. But they had the whole continent of Africa to make a new nation.

I find it interesting that the BLM idiots here think that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and every other early leader of our nation, should had been the White Saviors for Africans and Native peoples. Were the Natives and Africans too stupid to make their own free nation? They certainly had the numbers and the resources. So which is it, my BLM friends? Did blacks and natives need the white man to give them rights and freedom? Were they too stupid to accomplish this on their own? Why is it the white man’s responsibility to provide these things to “people of color”? Even today, the majority of blacks keep trusting in their white liberal savior, and they still remain the poorest, least educated, most violent group in America.
Property owning white men
You ready to admit you are a traitor and support BLM?
Trumpian Clown, BLM has nothing to do with the fact that the Founders only allowed White Men who owned property to vote
Judging people from the 1700's by today's standards proves just how fucking STUPID you are. Do you support BLM? Yes or NO? If you say yes then you support their treasonous actions and violent outbursts and are in FACT a traitor to the USA.
:clap: :clap::clap:
 

night_son

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Messages
6,007
Reaction score
3,838
Points
1,095
Location
The Full Moon
This is the argument of the radical left, wanting to tear down every symbol and statue of the Founding Fathers and of our Independence. That, as CNN puts it, the Declaration of “Independence” (they put that in quotes now), didn’t apply to blacks or natives.

My question to you America hating BLM types is, why should had the white people from Europe built a free nation for Africans? Or for the Natives? Or for the Chinese for that matter? Most of the people in the colonies considered themselves English in heritage, if not nationality. They were after all building and expanding colonies for the British and the crown. They had their rights as citizens diminished and stripped, that’s all they really wanted at first, was their rights back and representation. People who weren’t ever British citizens to begin with, probably didn’t care much.

It’s stupid to think that these people of English and European descent would fight to make a free nation for Natives, Africans, or anyone else but themselves. A people and culture are defined by their language, values, and religion. It’s funny how BLM types like morons on this board feel that Africans were entitled to the benefits of these white people fighting a war for independence. Why couldn’t the Africans build their own free nation somewhere? Oh I know, they couldn’t build ships to sail to the Western Hemisphere to start any colonies. But they had the whole continent of Africa to make a new nation.

I find it interesting that the BLM idiots here think that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and every other early leader of our nation, should had been the White Saviors for Africans and Native peoples. Were the Natives and Africans too stupid to make their own free nation? They certainly had the numbers and the resources. So which is it, my BLM friends? Did blacks and natives need the white man to give them rights and freedom? Were they too stupid to accomplish this on their own? Why is it the white man’s responsibility to provide these things to “people of color”? Even today, the majority of blacks keep trusting in their white liberal savior, and they still remain the poorest, least educated, most violent group in America.
The truth of the matter is complicated but still very clear and easy to comprehend. The culture, society and religion of the tribal peoples American slaves were removed from was wholly incompatible with the philosophy, religion, and proprietary governmental concepts of our Founding Fathers. Those African tribes did not and were not capable of grasping nor embracing the deeply Christian idea of individual rights and freedoms.

Now, the way I see it from a personal but very reasonable point of view is as follows. Had the historical roles of European and African peoples been reversed vis-à-vis New World Colonialism, then our European ancestors would have faired much, much worse historically, than the descendants of American slaves. To the tune of tribalism, shamanism, identity politics and cannibalism, our European ancestors would have suffered gravely at the hands of Empires of African tribes.

That being said, the irony here of all this present day post-American Independence hatred lies in the by default liberation of all descendants of American Slaves alive today who have been elevated beyond the savagery of their ancestral African Tribes to live as free men in the freest, greatest nation to ever exist in human history. The irony is, all you democrat racists, is that without their ancestors' being sold into slavery, modern African-Americans would still be suffering and dying and being tortured under the current governments of whatever have you Third World African nations. Sometimes, history and human nature have proven, incredibly good things come from very bad things. Such is the generational case of the African American. The opportunity for any African American to transcend any stigma of their ancestral origin to become even Presidents of these United States is truly breathless in its wonder, if one cares to stop and give it some thought. Then again, the same goes for any descendant of American immigrants of any race or creed.

In short, no one ever had it (potentially) so good as today's African American citizens here in our America of 2020. Those who squander that limitless potential and opportunity for success have no one to blame but themselves, and of course, their democratic party slave masters.
 

miketx

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2015
Messages
81,712
Reaction score
19,519
Points
2,220
Actually the Declaration was wrote for wealthy white men, and no one else. They treated women like crap, along with the poor, blacks and Native Americans. Same with the Constitution.
I know, that's why all those groups you spew about have just as many rights as white men do.
 

night_son

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2018
Messages
6,007
Reaction score
3,838
Points
1,095
Location
The Full Moon
Actually the Declaration was wrote for wealthy white men, and no one else. They treated women like crap, along with the poor, blacks and Native Americans. Same with the Constitution.
And now, silly rabbit, ALL peoples who can call themselves lawful American Citizens have, at their fingertips, the unlimited potential and opportunity to become whoever and whatever their dreams desire. All it takes; all it has ever taken, is enough hard work and perseverance and personal responsibility. What you and your democrat lackeys are doing is advocating for equal economic status for FREE and as some kind of birthright. America doesn't work like that, never has . . . and God willing, never shall. All of those "rich" people you froth at the mouth hate through projectile spittle? All of them began with nothing at some point in their ancestral family lines and WORKED HARD day and fucking night for years and years to make something amazing out of themselves; something they could pass down to their future generations. You advocate for entitlement of the lazy and socially destructive. You are anti-civilization. And you are, at least academically, the antithesis of American values.
 

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
372
Points
130
Location
alaska, usa
The USA has led the world in granting freedom and liberty
Freedom and liberty are granted to us by God and by nature, not by other people. Humans chain, enslave, and imprison other humans, but they cannot "grant" freedom and liberty to other humans, any more than they have already been granted by their Creator.
Thousands of white men died to free black people. White men supported granting the women's vote. You're biased.
Those white men died fighting off other white men from the black slaves. Women who express opinions and vote are supposedly going to the polls and doing so independently without being "granted" any special assistance except for the obvious accommodations for the disabled, to hold the door open for a wheelchair whatnot. Whether the white Democrat men of City Hall "agree" to accept and count the votes of women is another matter, but it is not a "grant" on their behalf.

People need to stop taking everything for granted in this damned country.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
83,099
Reaction score
17,477
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Actually the Declaration was wrote for wealthy white men, and no one else. They treated women like crap, along with the poor, blacks and Native Americans. Same with the Constitution.
The USA has led the world in granting freedom and liberty. Thousands of white men died to free black people. White men supported granting the women's vote. You're biased.
Some...but clearly not enough
 

RetiredGySgt

Diamond Member
Joined
May 6, 2007
Messages
47,182
Reaction score
9,123
Points
2,040
Location
North Carolina
Actually the Declaration was wrote for wealthy white men, and no one else. They treated women like crap, along with the poor, blacks and Native Americans. Same with the Constitution.
The USA has led the world in granting freedom and liberty. Thousands of white men died to free black people. White men supported granting the women's vote. You're biased.
Some...but clearly not enough
Actually ENOUGH to have passed the amendment to allow women the vote and to protect it. There were what 48 states then so 36 states voted for it at least that means a majority of men at the time. Go peddle your bullshit elsewhere.
 
Joined
Aug 15, 2017
Messages
24,174
Reaction score
7,036
Points
290
Location
Tejas
Actually the Declaration was wrote for wealthy white men, and no one else. They treated women like crap, along with the poor, blacks and Native Americans. Same with the Constitution.
The USA has led the world in granting freedom and liberty. Thousands of white men died to free black people. White men supported granting the women's vote. You're biased.
Some...but clearly not enough
What do you mean "not enough?"

Do you have the right to vote or not? That would, by definition, be ENOUGH.
 

Crepitus

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2018
Messages
36,579
Reaction score
6,238
Points
1,140
This is the argument of the radical left, wanting to tear down every symbol and statue of the Founding Fathers and of our Independence. That, as CNN puts it, the Declaration of “Independence” (they put that in quotes now), didn’t apply to blacks or natives.

My question to you America hating BLM types is, why should had the white people from Europe built a free nation for Africans? Or for the Natives? Or for the Chinese for that matter? Most of the people in the colonies considered themselves English in heritage, if not nationality. They were after all building and expanding colonies for the British and the crown. They had their rights as citizens diminished and stripped, that’s all they really wanted at first, was their rights back and representation. People who weren’t ever British citizens to begin with, probably didn’t care much.

It’s stupid to think that these people of English and European descent would fight to make a free nation for Natives, Africans, or anyone else but themselves. A people and culture are defined by their language, values, and religion. It’s funny how BLM types like morons on this board feel that Africans were entitled to the benefits of these white people fighting a war for independence. Why couldn’t the Africans build their own free nation somewhere? Oh I know, they couldn’t build ships to sail to the Western Hemisphere to start any colonies. But they had the whole continent of Africa to make a new nation.

I find it interesting that the BLM idiots here think that George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and every other early leader of our nation, should had been the White Saviors for Africans and Native peoples. Were the Natives and Africans too stupid to make their own free nation? They certainly had the numbers and the resources. So which is it, my BLM friends? Did blacks and natives need the white man to give them rights and freedom? Were they too stupid to accomplish this on their own? Why is it the white man’s responsibility to provide these things to “people of color”? Even today, the majority of blacks keep trusting in their white liberal savior, and they still remain the poorest, least educated, most violent group in America.
You wanna look at it that way why should they have been here at all? There were already free people here.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top