Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 51,701
- 15,271
- 2,180
What leftards are under the impression of is that any land that isn't occupied by someone is owned by "da gubermint" and it belongs to this corporate entity and these idiots believe that the federal "gubermint" is just looking out for them by not allowing a rancher's cattle to graze on unoccupied land without paying a "fee" for cows eating weeds and grass. What these idiots do not know is that the international bankers that own USA.INC owns everything...even their homes. They do not have allodial rights to it...they do not own it outright and this is because of the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy of 1933. If you have a clear title on your home, look at the occupant part and you will see "tenet"....think you own your home? Skip a property tax payment and tell me how that works out for you.
USA.INC is a for profit entity that was taken into receivership by the IMF in 1950, the same banking oligarchs that own the Fed central bank run the International Monetary Fund. We are not under the constitution and if you go before an administrator disguised as a judge demanding those "rights" without knowing Black's Law Dictionary 5th edition, you will get devoured in their admiralty courts. We are not under Common law and haven't been in our lifetime and that is a fact.
You know that 'admirality court' horseshit has never been recognized as having the slightest legal relevance in any court of law, right?
Dale......once again, you simply don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
The funniest part about it is that the "freeman on the land" morons take failure as success - every failed court case they've been involved in is somehow transmuted into a "victory" by their bizarro logic.
That's the beauty of using naked delusion as the basis of your argument, I suppose. When your made up nonsense is dismissed for what it is, you can just make up all new nonsense to explain away the verdict.
Its a gloriously circular system of 'reasoning'.