Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To some extent I agree, but they are pretty good at showing trends at least. Over time, the race has narrowed.Nothing cause polls at this point are pointless. They're good for nothing more than campaigns to sharpen their messages & where to spend their money.
The LA Times Poll is useless because it's model is scewed, but the Economist you gov is interesting because it shows Hillary's margin as exactly the average of the two previous econ you gov polls taken before the convention.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
I think the race has always been close. The press is just moving the numbers so they don't look like idiots Nov. 9th.To some extent I agree, but they are pretty good at showing trends at least. Over time, the race has narrowed.Nothing cause polls at this point are pointless. They're good for nothing more than campaigns to sharpen their messages & where to spend their money.
Every fucking MSNBC talking bobble head (why do all the negro women on MSNBC have straightened 'Whitey hair?) and the negro men and everyone else in the tank for Hillary declared last week if Hillary did not get at least an 8 point 'bounce' she will be in deep shit come election day.Nothing cause polls at this point are pointless. They're good for nothing more than campaigns to sharpen their messages & where to spend their money.
No, there's an undeniable switch in the polls since the Dem convention. But that does not necessarily mean much. It's still close in the polls. Though the last two supposedly giving Trump some momentum, I'd take with a grain of salt ... and lime and tequila.Every fucking MSNBC talking bobble head (why do all the negro women on MSNBC have straightened 'Whitey hair?) and the negro men and everyone else in the tank for Hillary declared last week if Hillary did not get at least an 8 point 'bounce' she will be in deep shit come election day.Nothing cause polls at this point are pointless. They're good for nothing more than campaigns to sharpen their messages & where to spend their money.
The bitch's 'bump' disappeared like a fart in the wind within a few days.
You should take a closer look at the LA Times poll. It isn't good news for Trump.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
No, of course his being +1 against the Beast is a catastrophe.You should take a closer look at the LA Times poll. It isn't good news for Trump.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
It is a tracking poll, they report the prior 7 day's results every morning. So today's poll is reflecting interviews from 7/27-8/2. Tomorrow will be 7/28-8/3 and so on. Because of this, the poll isn't even fully taking into account the entire DNC and Trump has already lost 5 points during that time. He's dropping like a stone.No, of course his being +1 against the Beast is a catastrophe.You should take a closer look at the LA Times poll. It isn't good news for Trump.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
The LATIMES poll is a rolling average of daily polls of likely voters over the last seven days, so it is hardly useless. The Economist/YouGov poll is a snapshot of registered voters, not likely voters. The two polls are simply not comparable.The LA Times Poll is useless because it's model is scewed, but the Economist you gov is interesting because it shows Hillary's margin as exactly the average of the two previous econ you gov polls taken before the convention.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
And that might support my "hunch" that Hillary's convention didn't give her a real bounce. It may have hurt Donald, but more so it may have stemmed the bleeding from Comey. That is, the polls may essentially be back to where they were before either convention.
The question will be next week's polls and whether they show whether Donald's recent miscues have cost him.
It is a tracking poll, they report the prior 7 day's results every morning. So today's poll is reflecting interviews from 7/27-8/2. Tomorrow will be 7/28-8/3 and so on. Because of this, the poll isn't even fully taking into account the entire DNC and Trump has already lost 5 points during that time. He's dropping like a stone.No, of course his being +1 against the Beast is a catastrophe.You should take a closer look at the LA Times poll. It isn't good news for Trump.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
The problem with the LA Times poll is that it takes forever to update based on changes in the race and it interviews the same 2000 people over and over again. That means if you took a shitty sample at the beginning of the polling that the sample will continue to be shitty. Whereas other polls may have a shitty sample as a one off, they likely aren't going to do it during every new poll.The LATIMES poll is a rolling average of daily polls of likely voters over the last seven days, so it is hardly useless. The Economist/YouGov poll is a snapshot of registered voters, not likely voters. The two polls are simply not comparable.The LA Times Poll is useless because it's model is scewed, but the Economist you gov is interesting because it shows Hillary's margin as exactly the average of the two previous econ you gov polls taken before the convention.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
And that might support my "hunch" that Hillary's convention didn't give her a real bounce. It may have hurt Donald, but more so it may have stemmed the bleeding from Comey. That is, the polls may essentially be back to where they were before either convention.
The question will be next week's polls and whether they show whether Donald's recent miscues have cost him.
It's been reported for some times that the LA times poll sample is skewed. It is a useless poll, but it may have some use in cancelling any bias in other polls using the avg of all polls.The LATIMES poll is a rolling average of daily polls of likely voters over the last seven days, so it is hardly useless. The Economist/YouGov poll is a snapshot of registered voters, not likely voters. The two polls are simply not comparable.The LA Times Poll is useless because it's model is scewed, but the Economist you gov is interesting because it shows Hillary's margin as exactly the average of the two previous econ you gov polls taken before the convention.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
And that might support my "hunch" that Hillary's convention didn't give her a real bounce. It may have hurt Donald, but more so it may have stemmed the bleeding from Comey. That is, the polls may essentially be back to where they were before either convention.
The question will be next week's polls and whether they show whether Donald's recent miscues have cost him.
Trump ... churchill. You're killing me.I think people see through the Bull-Shit.
The Democrats will do or say anything they think will get them into the White House...truth is irrelevant...and the Lap-Dog Democratic Media is prostitute and compliant.
Everybody knows this.
They understand that Trump is a rookie campaigner with some moderate personality disorders.
But, that is nothing, for those not suckling from the Federal Tit, when we look to his opponent--who is clearly a pathological liar (very dangerous personality disorder), also a crook...and an incompetent, hate-filled, abusive, coattail rider of her pussy-lovin Southern Boy husband. Without him, she would be a Notary Public in Chicago, likely dis-barred.
Sometimes only evil choices are available to human wisdom.
The Brits had to make a terrible choice back in the late 1930's. They just knew Winston Churchill was beyond mere personality disorders...and well into the Bat-Shit Crazy zone.
Americans must make a choice between evils
They are going to chose the Outsider, not the Criminal...no matter how much money and press they throw at Trump.
It has to be done.
Maybe we will get lucky like the Brits.
================
What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
Not according to polls posted here. You're just repeating horseshit expecting it to be taken as truth eventually, Herr Goebbels. And what for? Nobody but idiots get that spun up so early.It is a tracking poll, they report the prior 7 day's results every morning. So today's poll is reflecting interviews from 7/27-8/2. Tomorrow will be 7/28-8/3 and so on. Because of this, the poll isn't even fully taking into account the entire DNC and Trump has already lost 5 points during that time. He's dropping like a stone.No, of course his being +1 against the Beast is a catastrophe.You should take a closer look at the LA Times poll. It isn't good news for Trump.What is America going to do about this:
Economist/YouGov 7/30 - 8/1 933 RV 4.1 46 43 Clinton +3
LA Times/USC 7/27 - 8/2 2188 LV -- 44 45 Trump +1
