But you seemingly have no perspective on what it means to truly be poor. Or why someone is in that situation.
The terms are thrown around on USMB anytime it serves your personal agenda or ideology without giving any thought to what constitutes their personal circumstances. I've told my story a couple times so I won't go into it again but sufficed to say most of you are clueless.
Most of the time a mere lack of priorities leads a family down the wrong path. How many times have you stopped to help a homeless person to offer help only to have it denied? I have many times. On occasion I've offered to work someone with a "will work for food" sign only to have them put out their cigarette (which cost money) and tell me they really only had time for cash gifts.
Then you have families that can barely afford to put food on the table yet they have cable and xboxes. My brother is one of those people. He is right now as we speak sleeping in my basement despite being told to find a job by this Monday or get out.
I am tired of people always saying we have to do more for the poor when a large portion of them won't even help themselves. I lifted myself from poverty so why do I have to do for others what they can do for themselves? I'm not saying we shouldn't have a safety net but I am saying the able but unwilling can fall through our safety net for all I care.
So how do you define "large portion". You seem to want to not help anyone because you've witnessed the bad apples you take advantage of the system. Then you assume that a large portion of the poor are just like your brother. Seems rather short sighted. The problem is, how do you differentiate the people who truly need help from those who are milking the system? How can you provide the help to those who need it and withhold it from the deadbeats? Answer that and you'll solve something that no one else has been able to.
drug test.
But you seemingly have no perspective on what it means to truly be poor. Or why someone is in that situation.
The terms are thrown around on USMB anytime it serves your personal agenda or ideology without giving any thought to what constitutes their personal circumstances. I've told my story a couple times so I won't go into it again but sufficed to say most of you are clueless.
Most of the time a mere lack of priorities leads a family down the wrong path. How many times have you stopped to help a homeless person to offer help only to have it denied? I have many times. On occasion I've offered to work someone with a "will work for food" sign only to have them put out their cigarette (which cost money) and tell me they really only had time for cash gifts.
Then you have families that can barely afford to put food on the table yet they have cable and xboxes. My brother is one of those people. He is right now as we speak sleeping in my basement despite being told to find a job by this Monday or get out.
I am tired of people always saying we have to do more for the poor when a large portion of them won't even help themselves. I lifted myself from poverty so why do I have to do for others what they can do for themselves? I'm not saying we shouldn't have a safety net but I am saying the able but unwilling can fall through our safety net for all I care.
So how do you define "large portion". You seem to want to not help anyone because you've witnessed the bad apples you take advantage of the system. Then you assume that a large portion of the poor are just like your brother. Seems rather short sighted. The problem is, how do you differentiate the people who truly need help from those who are milking the system? How can you provide the help to those who need it and withhold it from the deadbeats? Answer that and you'll solve something that no one else has been able to.
drug test.
Drug test. Hmmmm, interesting. Think about this for a minute. Imagine what would happen if every person of working age (employed, self-employed, and unemployed) were to be drug tested....since we have all these people with "severe back pain", in America.
40 U.S. Deaths a Day from Prescription Painkillers
40 people per day isn't many, next to 300+ million people...but my hunch tells me that this doesn't scratch the surface of the number of abusers. And my point in making this assertion, is that the unemployed on welfare are not the only "dopeheads" in this country. Believe it!
Signs of several types of drug abuses:
Drug Use Signs / Symptoms
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rHfWg-z8Gw&feature=related]Glenn Beck Explains Why He Chewed Out Liberal Caller - YouTube[/ame]
(totally inappropriate behavior)
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in1AovV3zgU]Part 1 Rush Limbaugh: Obama is Destroying the Economy - YouTube[/ame]
(the scratching, and sweating)
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdBiUnHSZDM&feature=related]Warning Signs of Painkiller Addiction - YouTube[/ame]
Now if these two aren't immune, no one is. I had a coworker recently punch out the screen of one of our laptops. Of course he is no longer employed with us, but it turned out that he had a HUGE addiction to oxycontin. It's so common, that I wonder how many people would join the ranks of the unemployed, if EVERYONE were suddenly drug tested.
I'll betcha millions!