Because you are claiming what you speak as the truth. You don't say, hey, Taz could be wrong, this is just Taz's opinion. You are literally representing what you say as THE truth.
No, I said there is no universal truth as everyone sees things their own way. Reality is in the eye of the beholder.
Which means you believe only opinions exist so you can't be right about anything.
So you lose again.
#stillwinning
What are you? 12 years old? lol.
That would make your beat down even worse.
NO, YOU ARE! lol
At the heart of the debate is reality. The definition of reality is the world or the state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them.
So the definition of reality proves there is an absolute or universal truth.
So whose reality do we need to follow? Yours?
Reality is independent of people, Taz.
Truth, like logic, is discovered. We can't make it be what we want it to be. And when people like you try to do that they end up suffering predictable surprises. Why? Because error cannot stand. Eventually error fails. And when it does you discover the logical reason why the standard exists. It's how God prunes us.
Aren't you happy that God is pruning you?
What is the truth ding?
I mean can you tell us how the universe was formed
Truth is reality.
Space and time were created from nothing through a quantum tunneling event which did not violate the FLoT with nearly equal amounts of matter and anti-matter particles. For every 1 billion anti-matter particles there were 1 billion and 1 matter particles. The anti-matter and matter particles annihilated each other ( according to Einstein’s famous equation,
E = mc2, in which
E is the energy of the radiation,
m is the annihilated mass, and
c is the speed of light) releasing tremendous amounts of radiation (as measured by the cosmic background radiation) which propelled the remaining matter particles outward. So that when all the mutual annihilation had happened, there remained over that one particle per billion, and that now constitutes all the matter in the universe -- all the galaxies, the stars and planets, and of course all life.
LOL, obviously matter and antimatter did not annihilate one another or were not equal or there is no universe
Check your math retard
You are arguing with George Wald.
"...How is it that we have a universe of matter at all?
Our universe is made of four kinds of so-called elementary particles: neutrons, protons, electrons, and photons, which are particles of radiation. (I disregard neutrinos, since they do not interact with other matter; also the host of other particles that appear transiently in the course of high‑energy nuclear interactions.) The only important qualification one need make to such a simple statement is that the first three particles exist also as antiparticles, the particles constituting matter, the anti-particles anti-matter. When matter comes into contact with anti-matter they mutually annihilate each other, and their masses are instantly turned into radiation according to Einstein’s famous equation,
E = mc2, in which
E is the energy of the radiation,
m is the annihilated mass, and
c is the speed of light.
The positive and negative electric charges that divide particles from anti-particles are perfectly symmetrical. So the most reasonable expectation is that exactly equal numbers of both particles and anti-particles entered the Big Bang, the cosmic explosion in which our universe is thought to have begun. In that case, however, in the enormous compression of material at the Big Bang, there must have occurred a tremendous storm of mutual annihilation, ending with the conversion of all the particles and anti-particles into radiation. We should have come out of the Big Bang with a universe containing only radiation.
Fortunately for us, it seems that a tiny mistake was made. In 1965, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson at the Bell Telephone Laboratories in New Jersey discovered a new microwave radiation that fills the universe, coming equally from all directions, wherever one may be. It is by far the dominant radiation in the universe; billions of years of starlight have added to it only negligibly. It is commonly agreed that this is the residue remaining from that gigantic firestorm of mutual annihilation in the Big Bang.
It turns out that there are about one billion photons of that radiation for every proton in the universe. Hence it is thought that what went into the Big Bang were not exactly equal numbers of particles and anti-particles, but that for every billion anti-particles there were one billion
and one particles, so that when all the mutual annihilation had happened, there remained over that one particle per billion, and that now contitutes all the matter in the universe -- all the galaxies, the stars and planets, and of course all life..."
And CERN
home.cern
.
And every other cosmologist and physicist
Lancaster physicists working on the T2K major international experiment in Japan are closing in on the mystery of why there is so much matter in the Universe, and so little antimatter. The Big Bang should have created equal amounts of matter and antimatter in the early Universe but instead the Uni
scitechdaily.com
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
