So if it didn't work as the critics said...let's do it again, and again and again!!!

[Independent thinker]

The biased MSM says the bombing only delayed for a few months...

Exclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say​

The US military strikes on three of Iran’s nuclear facilities last weekend did not destroy the core components of the country’s nuclear program and likely only set it back by months, according to an early US intelligence assessment that was described by seven people briefed on it

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites

OK... first of all all of CNN's information came from.. as CBS said..
The assessment provides a range of possibilities for how long it will take for Iran to regain access to the underground facilities and resume its work, ranging from a few months to less than a year, the source told CBS News. The source added that Trump administration officials were warned prior to the strike that this was a possible outcome.
So if this is true, why can't the "source" identify themselves?

BUT as the thread title suggests... OK... let's say it set it back by months... FINE bomb the 3 sites again and again and again!
And if Iran moves to another site to develop their nuclear bombs... bomb those sites but whatever happens don't let the leaders of a country that does the following to their people...
So for all you truly ignorant people that support this life style... remember women are considered less than men, that their religion hates all infidels...LIKE some of you dummies!!
And the following are what the rest of the world sees as a very restrictive society!

• Capital Punishment: Iran has one of the highest execution rates in the world, with a significant number of executions occurring for drug-related offenses, despite concerns that many of these do not meet the international "most serious crimes" threshold. Other crimes punishable by death include murder (often through retribution or "qesas"), rape, apostasy, blasphemy, and certain political crimes, like "waging war against God" (moharebeh) or "spreading corruption on earth" (efsad-fil-arz). These terms can be applied to activities deemed to undermine the government.
• Corporal Punishments: The Iranian Penal Code includes corporal punishments such as amputation, flogging, blinding, and stoning.
• These punishments are considered torture by Amnesty International and have been condemned internationally.
• Imprisonment: Individuals can be subjected to arbitrary detention and lengthy prison sentences, often after unfair trials. Revolutionary courts, which handle cases related to national security and political dissent, have been criticized for lacking due process and relying on coerced confessions.
• Extrajudicial Actions:
  • Torture and Ill-treatment: Detainees, particularly political prisoners, are routinely subjected to torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment to extract confessions or information. Reported methods include beatings, rape, sexual assault, sleep deprivation, and denial of medical care.
  • Arbitrary Detention and Enforced Disappearances: Authorities frequently detain individuals without charge or trial, and sometimes prevent families from knowing their whereabouts.
  • Suppression of Dissent: The government employs various methods to stifle opposition and restrict freedoms of expression, association, and assembly. This includes censoring media, blocking internet access, and cracking down on protesters and human rights defenders.

Technical Difficulties

I have a thread on here where the lefty media routinelty said that Iran did not have a nuclear program and, after the US bombing, all of a sudden they changed their tune to our bombing only set their nuclear program back only a few months.

 

[g5000]

The biased MSM says the bombing only delayed for a few months...

Actually, the DIA says it. The media is simply reporting what the DIA says.

I don't know if you are aware of this, but that is the media's job.

Do you have some inside information to contradict the Defense Intelligence Agency?

 

[Mac1958]

What makes you think, he or the US military isn't way ahead of you? If the reported intel, the Whitehouse press secretary acknowledged as existing, is proved correct, I would imagine plans were in the works, for additional strikes as necessary. I speculate, that if the final Battle Damage Assessment, does not confirm destruction to a predetermined level of success, another strike would be sent. It is not like the fuel, munitions, and paychecks come out of Donny's pocket. It is doubtful, at this point, another leak would occur before another strike in some form were sent, if needed. Mind you, it could be weeks before DIA/CIA/Mossad have a final product. It is not like they will be invited in, to view the site.

I don't know why the Trumpsters are so defensive about this.

It's almost as if they know how likes to bullshit lie blow everything out of proportion by x100.

It really is okay to just wait until all the facts are in.

 

[g5000]

the Whitehouse press secretary

 

[whitehall]

Anyone who uses the lying bastards in CNN as a reference to the conflict in Iran is a fool.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The lying bastard in the DIA, whitehall, are not lying bastards.

The strike, while massive and very damaging, did not finish the job.

 

[healthmyths]

Actually, the DIA says it. The media is simply reporting what the DIA says.

I don't know if you are aware of this, but that is the media's job.

Do you have some inside information to contradict the Defense Intelligence Agency?

FACTS not guesses!
White House officials are hunting the suspected “low-level paper pusher” who leaked a preliminary Pentagon intelligence assessment questioning the scale of destruction after Saturday’s US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites — as the CIA released its own finding that the attacks set the theocracy’s nuke development back “years.”

The controversial Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment, first reported Tuesday by CNN, stated with a low level of confidence that the US attacks may only have disrupted Iran’s progress toward an atomic weapon for a few months.

The DIA report was circulated Sunday, just hours after B-2 bombers dropped “bunker busters” on the Fordow enrichment site, and says it was compiled without input from other intelligence agencies, sources told The Post.

Feds hunt leaker of initial intel assessment on Iran strikes— as CIA says Tehran nuke program set back ‘years’

The Defense Intelligence Agency report was circulated Sunday, just hours after B-2 bombers dropped “bunker busters” on the Fordow enrichment site.

nypost.com

MORE facts which you ignore!

• Leaked Report: A preliminary DIA assessment, leaked to the media, suggested the strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by a matter of months, rather than eliminating it.
• White House Response: The White House strongly disagreed with this assessment, calling it "flat-out wrong".
• Differing Assessments: Other U.S. officials, including the Defense Secretary and the Director of National Intelligence, along with the CIA, have stated that the strikes caused severe damage and would set back Iran's program significantly.
• Controversy and Debate: This disagreement highlights the challenges in assessing the full extent of damage to complex and potentially clandestine facilities. The leaked report itself acknowledged its "low confidence" level, being based on limited information gathered shortly after the strikes.
• Investigation: The unauthorized disclosure of the classified report is being investigated by the FBI.

In summary, while the initial leaked DIA report indicated a limited impact, it was labeled as preliminary and low-confidence, and its findings have been contested by the White House and other U.S. intelligence agencies. The actual long-term effects of the strikes are still being assessed.

https://www.wsj.com/politics/national-security/uproar-over-leaked-intelligence-underlines-murky-view-of-iran-strikes-7f239b0a?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAhhxTNbB170gAqhoVa1G7XpGaZZySk_vvZPUe3nXpfXbJOFFx2xzPfY&gaa_ts=685d8b0a&gaa_sig=gN27WHHaAGZOUdz19tAI3b8uQORY1WanW2fmjoB4Ch-7zRNTUNEMtSpDPntVXtkn8UzTV07sQEfRNScZOQSKig%3D%3D

 

[healthmyths]

So what? Step off, shugger.

Because you wrote as if you spoke Farsi! What a great example of your ignorance!
By the way in the future show where you got your other language quotes like this!
It's so simple https://translate.google.com/?sl=auto&tl=en&op=translate

 

[healthmyths]

They are constantly right and, updating and adapting plans to support "war gamed" scenarios of every description, all fictitious, supported by units and groups, doing map exercises, graded, evaluated, after action reviewed and reports written. I couldn't possibly count how many I was involved in, back in the day. They go on at many levels of command and are good learning tools, sometime involve hundreds or even thousands in far-flung locations. I needed no link, as lived it. It's a thing, or was back in the day, and I seriously doubt it has changed.

Right and Santa Claus exists I bet you believe! Obviously you are so pompous you think you write, it is right!

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

healthmythis, we need facts not your opinions.

 

[healthmyths]

Trump has told us for four years we are broke...

And here is exactly what he SAID! FACTS!
Washington: The US, which has USD 20 trillion in debt, over USD 100 trillion in unfunded liabilities and a massive trade deficit of almost USD 800 billion a year, is "broke," and the world's biggest economy can no longer create "high-paying jobs," the Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said today.

"Our country is broke," Trump, 70, told a well-attended election rally in Colorado.

America Is Broke, Says Donald Trump

The US, which has USD 20 trillion in debt, over USD 100 trillion in unfunded liabilities and a massive trade deficit of almost USD 800 billion a year, is "broke," and the world's biggest economy can no longer create "high-paying jobs," the Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said today.

www.ndtv.com

 

[g5000]

FACTS not guesses!
White House officials are hunting the suspected “low-level paper pusher” who leaked a preliminary Pentagon intelligence assessment questioning the scale of destruction after Saturday’s US airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites — as the CIA released its own finding that the attacks set the theocracy’s nuke development back “years.”

The controversial Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment, first reported Tuesday by CNN, stated with a low level of confidence that the US attacks may only have disrupted Iran’s progress toward an atomic weapon for a few months.

The DIA report was circulated Sunday, just hours after B-2 bombers dropped “bunker busters” on the Fordow enrichment site, and says it was compiled without input from other intelligence agencies, sources told The Post.

Feds hunt leaker of initial intel assessment on Iran strikes— as CIA says Tehran nuke program set back ‘years’

The Defense Intelligence Agency report was circulated Sunday, just hours after B-2 bombers dropped “bunker busters” on the Fordow enrichment site.

nypost.com

MORE facts which you ignore!

• Leaked Report: A preliminary DIA assessment, leaked to the media, suggested the strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by a matter of months, rather than eliminating it.
• White House Response: The White House strongly disagreed with this assessment, calling it "flat-out wrong".

Of course the White House denies. That's their raison d'etre.

Was Karoline Leavitt on the ground in Iran?

Ask yourself. If the DIA could not make an assessment, as you allege, how could the White House make one in the same timeframe?

I'll go with the DIA for now rather than the well-established liars in the White House.

 

[healthmyths]

Of course the White House denies. That's their raison d'etre.

Was Karoline Leavitt on the ground in Iran?

Ask yourself. If the DIA could not make an assessment, as you allege, how could the White House make one in the same timeframe?

I'll go with the DIA for now rather than the well-established liars in the White House.

The DIA didn't make the statement! An anonymous source!

Exclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say...​

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites

Yes, according to various reports, the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment regarding the impact of US strikes on Iran's nuclear program was leaked to CNN by an anonymous source.
The White House, in a statement by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, confirmed the leak and characterized the source as "an anonymous, low-level loser in the intelligence community." The White House is working with the FBI and other authorities to investigate the unauthorized disclosure of classified information.
This leaked assessment indicated that the US strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by a few months, and that much of their nuclear material and infrastructure remained intact. This assessment was in contrast to claims by President Trump and others that the strikes had "completely and totally obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities.

Feds hunt leaker of initial intel assessment on Iran strikes— as CIA says Tehran nuke program set back ‘years’

The Defense Intelligence Agency report was circulated Sunday, just hours after B-2 bombers dropped “bunker busters” on the Fordow enrichment site.

nypost.com

 

[Moonglow]

37 trillion in debt means you're broke

I came into this world with nothing and will leave this world with nothing.

 

[healthmyths]

I came into this world with nothing and will leave this world with nothing.

In most peoples' cases not true they will leave with nothing as they have memories... but you... it has appeared
from your prior posts you have done nothing to create memories... so for once you are right!

 

[healthmyths]

healthmythis, we need facts not your opinions.

REALLY??? Look who's talking!
Wow... almost all my comments are based on experts information and note I didn't say all as idiots like you would do nor will I say YOU never provide links, but it is far more LESS frequently than my not providing links.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

REALLY??? Look who's talking!
Wow... almost all my comments are based on experts information and note I didn't say all as idiots like you would do nor will I say YOU never provide links, but it is far more LESS frequently than my not providing links.

DIA said this. Hegseth said that. Trump said something else.

Saying something is not factual in and of itself.

I provide AI links all the time, so grow up and have some respect.

If helps your ego, I am for bombing that hole at Fordor now again and again until we get it done.

We need the gov to tell us the truth, and you need to stop the apologetics.

I will admit Trump is doing better this time but has a long way to go.

 

[krichton]

Well, we all hoped it was destroyed. Who knows? It might be, it might not. There is not telling, the decision Trump would make if not destroyed. He could have them go again, or simply pretend and keep repeating the it was "obliterated". He has never been the first in line, to admit when wrong.

Except in his case, I doubt he's ever been on line at all.

 

[healthmyths]

DIA said this. Hegseth said that. Trump said something else.

Saying something is not factual in and of itself.

I provide AI links all the time, so grow up and have some respect.

If helps your ego, I am for bombing that hole at Fordor now again and again until we get it done.

We need the gov to tell us the truth, and you need to stop the apologetics.

I will admit Trump is doing better this time but has a long way to go.

You wrote..."DIA said this. Hegseth said that. Trump said something else."
A) We don't know if the DIA said this..."

• Anonymous Sources: Several media reports citing the initial DIA assessment relied on anonymous sources familiar with the assessment. These sources indicated that the assessment suggested the strikes may have only set back Iran's nuclear program by a matter of months, rather than "obliterated" it as claimed by the Trump administration."

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/24/politics/intel-assessment-us-strikes-iran-nuclear-sites

Hegseth was identified...not anonymous as what Trump said... again not anonymous!
That's the distinction!

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

I have a thread on here where the lefty media routinelty said that Iran did not have a nuclear program and, after the US bombing, all of a sudden they changed their tune to our bombing only set their nuclear program back only a few months.

A very short memory is a trait all leftists possess.