Snopes: Trump appointee said 'competent white men' must be in charge for 'things to work'

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
79,847
Reaction score
41,537
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
‘U.S. State Department hire Darren Beattie wrote on X: "Competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men."

In February 2025, news reports revealed that U.S. President Donald Trump's new Secretary of State Marco Rubio was appointing Darren Beattie to a key post in the State Department. Beattie was formerly a speechwriter during the first Trump administration and will be appointed to the role of undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs.’


And racists such as Trump and Beattie are liars, such as the lie that there’s a ‘national ideology’ hostile to white men.
 
WhiteSuprem3.webp
 
Splendid fellows with the courage of their sensible convictions.
Speak as you find them .
And ignore the low IQs who cannot tell the difference between honest criticism and cruel prejudice
As an example , my detestation of IQ-2.0 has nothing to do with ethnicity . I just do not like stupid people .

Is that bad /wrong ?
 
‘U.S. State Department hire Darren Beattie wrote on X: "Competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men."

In February 2025, news reports revealed that U.S. President Donald Trump's new Secretary of State Marco Rubio was appointing Darren Beattie to a key post in the State Department. Beattie was formerly a speechwriter during the first Trump administration and will be appointed to the role of undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs.’

.
And racists such as Trump and Beattie are liars, such as the lie that there’s a ‘national ideology’ hostile to white men.
"U.S. State Department hire Darren Beattie wrote on X: "Competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men."

I'm wondering about context here. Because it is true, DEI did demoralize competent white men. Not only white men, but the liberal left has been attacking white people and making them feel they are naturally and systemic racists. And, that blacks cannot be racists at the same time. The first sentence sounds bad but what is the context and who was he texting with and the topic? With that said, Marco Rubio is a Cuban American, Hispanic. Not white and is the one who hired Beattie.
 
‘U.S. State Department hire Darren Beattie wrote on X: "Competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men."

In February 2025, news reports revealed that U.S. President Donald Trump's new Secretary of State Marco Rubio was appointing Darren Beattie to a key post in the State Department. Beattie was formerly a speechwriter during the first Trump administration and will be appointed to the role of undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs.’


And racists such as Trump and Beattie are liars, such as the lie that there’s a ‘national ideology’ hostile to white men.
Rudy Giuliani knew

He hired some of the best people on his first term as mayor ... Most of them coincidentally were White no nonsense hard working mother f******

And all of Gotham rejoiced
 
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor on the second day of her confirmation hearings explained the well-publicized "wise Latina" comments she has made in the past.

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life," Sotomayor said in a speech at 2001 at the University of California, Berkeley, law school. She made similar statements at other such events.
 
"U.S. State Department hire Darren Beattie wrote on X: "Competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men."

I'm wondering about context here. Because it is true, DEI did demoralize competent white men. Not only white men, but the liberal left has been attacking white people and making them feel they are naturally and systemic racists. And, that blacks cannot be racists at the same time. The first sentence sounds bad but what is the context and who was he texting with and the topic? With that said, Marco Rubio is a Cuban American, Hispanic. Not white and is the one who hired Beattie.
Not only that, but competent white men have been deliberately excluded from jobs like ATC, in order to meet "diversity" quotas.

Scratch a DEI hack, watch a racist bleed.
 
‘U.S. State Department hire Darren Beattie wrote on X: "Competent white men must be in charge if you want things to work. Unfortunately, our entire national ideology is predicated on coddling the feelings of women and minorities, and demoralizing competent white men."

In February 2025, news reports revealed that U.S. President Donald Trump's new Secretary of State Marco Rubio was appointing Darren Beattie to a key post in the State Department. Beattie was formerly a speechwriter during the first Trump administration and will be appointed to the role of undersecretary for public diplomacy and public affairs.’


And racists such as Trump and Beattie are liars, such as the lie that there’s a ‘national ideology’ hostile to white men.
How is that anymore racist or sexist when Dems say they need to have “people of color” in positions of power?

I would just say there needs to be competent men in general that need to be in charge. There are definitely Asian, Latino, and black men that can do great at important jobs. But to force white men out as DEI did is suicide.
 
MAGA is no longer hiding their racism.

I don't agree with what the guy said, but how is this any different than the previous administration purposely excluding white men because of their race and gender? We know for a fact that the Obama Administration turned away qualified air traffic controllers because they were white men. Is that not also racism?
 
I don't agree with what the guy said, but how is this any different than the previous administration purposely excluding white men because of their race and gender?

It depends. White men were never excluded. There are white men everywhere in the government. Now what has happened is there is an opening. Two people apply. One white and one black. The black guy gets the job, even though the white man was equally qualified because there are already 90 white men compared to 3 black men.

You run with the fake claim the black man wasn't qualified but that's just the fake stuff we see ran with daily.


We know for a fact that the Obama Administration turned away qualified air traffic controllers because they were white men. Is that not also racism?

You don't know that for a fact. We knew for a fact that the voting machines were hacked until all the sources saying that went back to the shadows after the $800 million settlement.
 
Meh, I'm not even mad......Truth hurts I guess.

One only has to look at the FUBAR leadership of black-run US Cities.

Now that funding for many of them is going to be cut way back I look for things to get pretty darn sporty as they compete for the grift.
 
Meh, I'm not even mad......Truth hurts I guess.

One only has to look at the FUBAR leadership of black-run US Cities.

Now that funding for many of them is going to be cut way back I look for things to get pretty darn sporty as they compete for the grift.
Problem is that lots of wealthy, insulated white breads have gentrified those cities though they are still mostly run by corrupt blacks. When the gravy train gets cut off, things will become dicey for the white breads.
 
It depends. White men were never excluded.

A lot of 19th century Irish men would have a very different opinion on that.

There are white men everywhere in the government.

Because they make up a plurality of the work force.

Now what has happened is there is an opening. Two people apply. One white and one black. The black guy gets the job, even though the white man was equally qualified because there are already 90 white men compared to 3 black men.

You run with the fake claim the black man wasn't qualified but that's just the fake stuff we see ran with daily.

No, I don't run with it, but yes others do and affirmative action policies are a big reason for that, which is why I've always opposed them. When people know that racial preferences are being used it stirs those types of conclusions and stereotypes and undermines people who legitimately worked hard and deserved those opportunities.

You don't know that for a fact.

Maybe not 100%, but we kind of do. You know full well that the Obama and Biden admins were obsessed with race and gender and who we all sleep with. Just by looking at their appointments you can see how lopsided they were in proportion to the population.


Discriminating against someone because they are white and/or male is still discrimination and it shouldn't be treated any less than other types of discrimination.
 
Back
Top Bottom