Snopes Lies Again, Claims New York Bill Didn’t Really Legalize Abortions Up to Birth

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,866
400
.....”according to the practitioner’s reasonable and good faith professional judgment based on the facts of the patient’s case: the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.” .....

Yeah, like Planned Parenthood’s newly trained abortion technicians are going to turn down a full term baby with full term organs and lots of blood because they think the mother doesn’t have a good enough reason to abort :/

This bill removes protections for the unborn, denies them personhood, removes penalties for causing its death, removes penalties for coerced abortions, and makes doctors unnecessary to perform any abortion at any stage.

Can you imagine the black market coming in NY? Pregnancy cartels? How much are full term baby organs worth these days? Cheaper techs can do the job of killing one person while trying to keep the other alive; human incubators are cheaper than labs .....

Cuomo gives abortioners carte blanche to kill and reap unrestrained. Every base covered. Planned Parenthood gets lots more money for more complicated abortions, and fills the coffers of Il Duouche Sfachime for his 2020 run.


Snopes let its left-wing bias get in the way of the truth again this week when it “fact checked” reports about a radical new pro-abortion law in New York.

The so-called Reproductive Health Act goes beyond Roe v. Wade, allowing unborn babies to be aborted even when the U.S. Supreme Court has said states may restrict abortions. The law’s broad language will allow late-term abortions on viable, healthy unborn babies for basically any reason up to birth.

Snopes contested the fact and criticized LifeNews.com for describing the law in those terms.

“The law does not allow for unrestricted abortion up through the normal term of pregnancy,” Snopes argued, pointing to language in the new law that appears to limit late-term abortions.

It wrote:

The enactment of the RHA was characterized by some outlets, such as the pro-life website LifeNews as “a radical pro-abortion bill that would allow unborn babies to be aborted for basically any reason up to birth.”

In fact, the new law primarily allows for abortions up to the 24th week of pregnancy without restriction, and after the 24th week under certain conditions.

It cited a report explaining how the law allows abortions after 24 weeks only in cases where a woman’s life or health is threatened.

Later, Snopes continued:

The new law still imposes some restrictions on when late-term abortions can be performed, even as it loosens others:

“A health care practitioner licensed, certified, or authorized under title eight of the education law, acting within his or her lawful scope of practice, may perform an abortion when, according to the practitioner’s reasonable and good faith professional judgment based on the facts of the patient’s case: the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion...

Read more at lifenews.com ...
 

Forum List

Back
Top