SNL writer says she'll give a blowjob to anyone who punches the Covington smiling kid.

[Pogo]

NOBODY "got in the kids' face with a drum". Prove me wrong with a video.

Here you go. Look at that screen grab. Yep, its right in his face.

You didn't do it. I asked for a video showing where Philips, in your words, >>GOT<< in his face". That means MOVING. All I see is shots from before and during the time they were nose to nose. What you need to keep standing on the already-shaky ground you're on is video of Nathan Philips MOVING INTO the kid's personal space.

Got that?

 

[Pogo]

Again, if there's a blowjob on the table, "who she works for" is kind of irrelevant.

Doesn't look like there is, she lied about working for SNL, I doubt she is telling the truth about her being a prostitute, so you may get jail time but no BJ.

Liberals would put their penises in anything warm, wet and capable of suction of any kind.

A friend of mine worked at an Emergency room at a public hosp[ital and liberals would be brought in all the time with their penises stuck in weird stuff, or things stuck up elsewhere. And yes, the sphincter muscle is strong enough to break a coke bottle, just in case you ever wondered about it.

So some liberal offering a blow job? No, thank you; I'd rather chew bubble gum off the side walk.

Pretty disgusting as far as I am concerned.

Again ---- Hateway Pundit. Tweeter. Fake headline, fake thread title.

As just noted, it sure doesn't take much.

 

[Godboy]

NOBODY "got in the kids' face with a drum". Prove me wrong with a video.

Here you go. Look at that screen grab. Yep, its right in his face.

You didn't do it. I asked for a video showing where Philips, in your words, >>GOT<< in his face". That means MOVING. All I see is shots from before and during the time they were nose to nose. What you need to keep standing on the already-shaky ground you're on is video of Nathan Philips MOVING INTO the kid's personal space.

Got that?

You didnt watch the video? Come back once youve done that..

 

[Pogo]

Again, if there's a blowjob on the table, "who she works for" is kind of irrelevant.

Doesn't look like there is, she lied about working for SNL, I doubt she is telling the truth about her being a prostitute, so you may get jail time but no BJ.

Liberals would put their penises in anything warm, wet and capable of suction of any kind.

A friend of mine worked at an Emergency room at a public hosp[ital and liberals would be brought in all the time with their penises stuck in weird stuff, or things stuck up elsewhere. And yes, the sphincter muscle is strong enough to break a coke bottle, just in case you ever wondered about it.

So some liberal offering a blow job? No, thank you; I'd rather chew bubble gum off the side walk.

Oh **** you, partisan hacknoid. Nobody checks political philosphies at a ******* hospital. Your Composition Fallacy blows up on its own lauchpad.

 

[Slade3200]

It's now "offensive" and "threatening" to smile at someone. The Main Stream Media at it's finest! I can't believe some ass hats were making death threats to that high school kid because he "smirked" at someone. Are you kidding me? You folks on the left are so freaking unhinged these days it's not even funny anymore!

Are you trying to say that kid was simply smiling at the guy? Seriously? You gotta get your eyes checked. Death threats for that are apprehensible, but also don’t pretend like he was innocently standing there smiling at the guy

Dont pretend like the indians were being respectful. While one of them got in a kids face with a drum, the others were saying shit like, "this isnt your land. Go back to Europe where you came from".

Your priorities are way out of wack if you think the kids were the problem.

I think everybody played a part in the problem, especially the Israelites who appeared to be the instigators and who also got little to no coverage

Yet youre only complaining that a kid smiled awkwardly. Not one mention of the racism hurled against these kids. Jesus Christ man.

That’s not what I’m only complaining about, not at all. You need to paint it that way to try and win an argument but you’re just showing an inability to tell the truth or follow the conversation.

 

[Pogo]

The slut doesn't even write for SNL.
SNL Writer Offers Blowj*bs in Exchange for Someone Punching a Covington Catholic Student in the Face

UPDATE: An SNL writer has responded to this story by saying that Sarah Beattie does not write for them — despite her claims of being a contributor. Stolen valor in comedy?


Josh Patten@thejoshpatten
· 8h
https://twitter.com/thejoshpatten/status/1087733223055081475
Replying to @CassandraRules
She doesn’t write for SNL. Thanks in advance for the correction!


DDD@Dumoulin55

She sat on a panel of 3 to discuss the 50 funniest women of all time...In her little bio it says "those who listen to our podcast know how proud we are to welcome writer & SNL contributor Sarah Beattie (@nachosarah) to the panel! http://underscoopfire.com/the-50-funniest-women-of-all-time/ …

11
2:57 PM - Jan 22, 2019
Now SNL is going to roll the credits of their writers at the end of every show:

Due to her claims of working for them when she doesn’t, the show will now “clear up this confusion by scrolling a list of the writers’ names at the end of every show.”

The lady is pretty confused, I wouldn't trust her though, you smack a kid in the face and will wind up in jail and with all her lies, you won't even get a look let alone a BJ. Better put a watch on Clinton, he loves his bjs as long as Hillary doesn't give it to him, that seems to repulse him.

"SHE is pretty confused"?

Why don't you show the class where this person ever claimed to be an SNL writer. As you just claimed.

 

[Slade3200]

How about handing out responsibility where it’s due and not just blindly taking a side?

You mean like YOU did?

How did I do that? I laid out blame for all parties involved. You were too dense to notice

 

[Pogo]

NOBODY "got in the kids' face with a drum". Prove me wrong with a video.

Here you go. Look at that screen grab. Yep, its right in his face.

You didn't do it. I asked for a video showing where Philips, in your words, >>GOT<< in his face". That means MOVING. All I see is shots from before and during the time they were nose to nose. What you need to keep standing on the already-shaky ground you're on is video of Nathan Philips MOVING INTO the kid's personal space.

Got that?

You didnt watch the video? Come back once youve done that..

It's a mishmash of several videos I've already seen (yesterday) with a talking head in between. If you have a time stamp, blurt it out already.

 

[Pogo]

There was a problem between the Nation of Islam black activists and the high school students. Injun Joe was watching from a distance and read it wrong apparently. The students did not respond to the provocation from the black activists. For some unknown reason injun Joe the valor thief decided that the high school kids who were already under verbal assault needed to be pushed back. That of course was not his job. His actions were not what I would call peaceful. The young man refused to be intimidated. I guess he was supposed cower and run.

Jo

Again, the provocating group was Hebrew Israelites, not Nation of Islam, they are completely opposite. Details dude, details!

The native Americans were not aggressive, they were not taunting and they were not bullying. They moved in to try and deescalate. I wasn’t there but it makes sense that they would try and diffuse the lesser threatening of the two groups which was obviously the kids.

The native Americans were not aggressive, they were not taunting and they were not bullying. They moved in to try and deescalate.

Why didn't they get in the faces of the black guys shouting profanities? You know, to deescalate....

Given a choice, black thugs or white kids, who would you choose to bully?

The point is nobody bullied the valor thief.
The Media lied.

Jo

And AGAIN --- where did "the media" claim the kid "bullied" Philips?

Or perhaps it's you that "lied".

I do know the story as well as I can for not being there, it doesn’t sound like you do. Are you implying that the native Americans were taunting the kids?

There was a problem between the Nation of Islam black activists and the high school students. Injun Joe was watching from a distance and read it wrong apparently. The students did not respond to the provocation from the black activists. For some unknown reason injun Joe the valor thief decided that the high school kids who were already under verbal assault needed to be pushed back. That of course was not his job. His actions were not what I would call peaceful. The young man refused to be intimidated. I guess he was supposed cower and run.

Jo

Again, the provocating group was Hebrew Israelites, not Nation of Islam, they are completely opposite. Details dude, details!

The native Americans were not aggressive, they were not taunting and they were not bullying. They moved in to try and deescalate. I wasn’t there but it makes sense that they would try and diffuse the lesser threatening of the two groups which was obviously the kids.

The native Americans were not aggressive, they were not taunting and they were not bullying. They moved in to try and deescalate.

Why didn't they get in the faces of the black guys shouting profanities? You know, to deescalate....

And they were not bullied by the high school kids either the way the media claimed which is what this issue is all about. The big media lie. Done very much on purpose.

Jo

Let's see a LINK to that "claim".

Right now.

The slut doesn't even write for SNL.
SNL Writer Offers Blowj*bs in Exchange for Someone Punching a Covington Catholic Student in the Face

UPDATE: An SNL writer has responded to this story by saying that Sarah Beattie does not write for them — despite her claims of being a contributor. Stolen valor in comedy?


Josh Patten@thejoshpatten
· 8h
Replying to @CassandraRules
She doesn’t write for SNL. Thanks in advance for the correction!


DDD@Dumoulin55

She sat on a panel of 3 to discuss the 50 funniest women of all time...In her little bio it says "those who listen to our podcast know how proud we are to welcome writer & SNL contributor Sarah Beattie (@nachosarah) to the panel! http://underscoopfire.com/the-50-funniest-women-of-all-time/ …

11
2:57 PM - Jan 22, 2019
Now SNL is going to roll the credits of their writers at the end of every show:

Due to her claims of working for them when she doesn’t, the show will now “clear up this confusion by scrolling a list of the writers’ names at the end of every show.”

The lady is pretty confused, I wouldn't trust her though, you smack a kid in the face and will wind up in jail and with all her lies, you won't even get a look let alone a BJ. Better put a watch on Clinton, he loves his bjs as long as Hillary doesn't give it to him, that seems to repulse him.

"SHE is pretty confused"?

Why don't you show the class where this person ever claimed to be an SNL writer. As you just claimed.

NOBODY "got in the kids' face with a drum". Prove me wrong with a video.

Here you go. Look at that screen grab. Yep, its right in his face.

You didn't do it. I asked for a video showing where Philips, in your words, >>GOT<< in his face". That means MOVING. All I see is shots from before and during the time they were nose to nose. What you need to keep standing on the already-shaky ground you're on is video of Nathan Philips MOVING INTO the kid's personal space.

Got that?

You didnt watch the video? Come back once youve done that..

It's a mishmash of several videos I've already seen (yesterday) with a talking head in between. If you have a time stamp, blurt it out already.

​

 

[Godboy]

It's now "offensive" and "threatening" to smile at someone. The Main Stream Media at it's finest! I can't believe some ass hats were making death threats to that high school kid because he "smirked" at someone. Are you kidding me? You folks on the left are so freaking unhinged these days it's not even funny anymore!

Are you trying to say that kid was simply smiling at the guy? Seriously? You gotta get your eyes checked. Death threats for that are apprehensible, but also don’t pretend like he was innocently standing there smiling at the guy

Dont pretend like the indians were being respectful. While one of them got in a kids face with a drum, the others were saying shit like, "this isnt your land. Go back to Europe where you came from".

Your priorities are way out of wack if you think the kids were the problem.

I think everybody played a part in the problem, especially the Israelites who appeared to be the instigators and who also got little to no coverage

Yet youre only complaining that a kid smiled awkwardly. Not one mention of the racism hurled against these kids. Jesus Christ man.

That’s not what I’m only complaining about, not at all. You need to paint it that way to try and win an argument but you’re just showing an inability to tell the truth or follow the conversation.

Quote anything youve said up to this point in regards to the racism thrown at the kids. Lets see if youre an honest person or not.

 

[Slade3200]

Are you trying to say that kid was simply smiling at the guy? Seriously? You gotta get your eyes checked. Death threats for that are apprehensible, but also don’t pretend like he was innocently standing there smiling at the guy

Dont pretend like the indians were being respectful. While one of them got in a kids face with a drum, the others were saying shit like, "this isnt your land. Go back to Europe where you came from".

Your priorities are way out of wack if you think the kids were the problem.

I think everybody played a part in the problem, especially the Israelites who appeared to be the instigators and who also got little to no coverage

Yet youre only complaining that a kid smiled awkwardly. Not one mention of the racism hurled against these kids. Jesus Christ man.

That’s not what I’m only complaining about, not at all. You need to paint it that way to try and win an argument but you’re just showing an inability to tell the truth or follow the conversation.

Quote anything youve said up to this point in regards to the racism thrown at the kids. Lets see if youre an honest person or not.

I didn’t hear any racist remarks thrown at the kids nor did I deny it happened, I wasn’t there. I did say that the Hebrew Israelites seemed to be the instigators and the media went straight towards attacking the maga hats instead of showing the whole story.

What’s your objective unbiased take been on the situation Godboy?

 

[Godboy]

Dont pretend like the indians were being respectful. While one of them got in a kids face with a drum, the others were saying shit like, "this isnt your land. Go back to Europe where you came from".

Your priorities are way out of wack if you think the kids were the problem.

I think everybody played a part in the problem, especially the Israelites who appeared to be the instigators and who also got little to no coverage

Yet youre only complaining that a kid smiled awkwardly. Not one mention of the racism hurled against these kids. Jesus Christ man.

That’s not what I’m only complaining about, not at all. You need to paint it that way to try and win an argument but you’re just showing an inability to tell the truth or follow the conversation.

Quote anything youve said up to this point in regards to the racism thrown at the kids. Lets see if youre an honest person or not.

I didn’t hear any racist remarks thrown at the kids nor did I deny it happened, I wasn’t there. I did say that the Hebrew Israelites seemed to be the instigators and the media went straight towards attacking the maga hats instead of showing the whole story.

What’s your objective unbiased take been on the situation Godboy?

Thats ALL you said about the racism, yet youve posted how many times criticizing the kid? Youre garbage.

 

[Pogo]

Dont pretend like the indians were being respectful. While one of them got in a kids face with a drum, the others were saying shit like, "this isnt your land. Go back to Europe where you came from".

Your priorities are way out of wack if you think the kids were the problem.

I think everybody played a part in the problem, especially the Israelites who appeared to be the instigators and who also got little to no coverage

Yet youre only complaining that a kid smiled awkwardly. Not one mention of the racism hurled against these kids. Jesus Christ man.

That’s not what I’m only complaining about, not at all. You need to paint it that way to try and win an argument but you’re just showing an inability to tell the truth or follow the conversation.

Quote anything youve said up to this point in regards to the racism thrown at the kids. Lets see if youre an honest person or not.

I didn’t hear any racist remarks thrown at the kids nor did I deny it happened, I wasn’t there. I did say that the Hebrew Israelites seemed to be the instigators and the media went straight towards attacking the maga hats instead of showing the whole story.

That depends on what we're calling "the story". There's actually multiple stories going on here. The "Israelites" were certainly there and certainly exchanging taunts with the high schoolers (and presumably with others) which explains, as we said, why Nathan Philips approached the area.

But that does not explain Smirk-Boi at all. That's a whole separate story, the original one in fact, and it's the story the bubblers are trying to whisk away by making it about "yabbut these guys over here" and "whaddabout those guys over there".

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Bullshit.... He targeted the red hats and added to the problem. You don't diffuse by invading personal space....

Jo

That exactly what you do. When two groups are clashing you get inbetween and defuse.

Not unless you have a badge... And know what you're doing. In any case this is not about the Indian...it's about the media lie. The old man will be fine... Except for being a valor thief. It's the media and the archdiocese that will have to worry about legal problems coming their way because they are certainly coming. personally I would have shoved the drum paddle up his ass for swinging it 6 inches from my face. You don't difffuse something by provoking one of the sides. But then again that's why you leave it to the professionals.



Jo

Again, the native Americans were not provoking. Just be honest!!! I do agree with you about the media messing this whole thing up and blowing it way out of proportion

Nobody is charging the Indians with anything the media of the archdiocese are charging the high school kids with bullying; that was a lie and still is a lie. It also constitutes willful libel and I believe we will see this case in court. Both the media and the archdiocese could be liable for financial damages.

Jo

I agree. Let’s just be real, the black Hebrew Israelites and the kids were yelling back-and-forth at each other. From the sounds of things the Israelites were being pretty nasty. The Native Americans got in front of the kids to try and de-escalate. Some of the kids are being jerks, like the one that stared down the old timer. The media blew it way out of proportion and targeted the Maga hats

It's obvious you refused to watch the Blaze video with the tick tock review of events. Anything you say in this thread can be labeled uninformed bullshit.

 

[Papageorgio]

Doesn't look like there is, she lied about working for SNL, I doubt she is telling the truth about her being a prostitute, so you may get jail time but no BJ.

Ummmmmmmmmmm check yer facts Bud. First of all the link goes to the ******* Hateway Pundit, about the most bogus fake-news site there is. And their only "source" is ******* Twitterer. I don't see whoever this person is "claiming" anything, and yet you're all in here appending "slut" to somebody you've never met or heard of, or heard from.

Really, you're ready to put somebody in jail on the word of Jim ******* Hoft and ******* TWEETER? Not exactly a high bar, is it.

Wanna buy a bridge?

Gullible's Travels...........

Who are we putting in jail for someone's word?

Beats the shit outta me, "jail" was your idea.

But hey, don't stop there -- I understand she's a witch too. You should totally run with that because it's the same thing.

If you are stupid enough to punch someone, you can go to jail. So if you take up Sarah's offer and you punch a kid in a hat, then you may go to jail and not get a blowjob.

I'd get the blowjob first. Priorities.

She is all yours, i would

Again, if there's a blowjob on the table, "who she works for" is kind of irrelevant.

Doesn't look like there is, she lied about working for SNL, I doubt she is telling the truth about her being a prostitute, so you may get jail time but no BJ.

Liberals would put their penises in anything warm, wet and capable of suction of any kind.

A friend of mine worked at an Emergency room at a public hosp[ital and liberals would be brought in all the time with their penises stuck in weird stuff, or things stuck up elsewhere. And yes, the sphincter muscle is strong enough to break a coke bottle, just in case you ever wondered about it.

So some liberal offering a blow job? No, thank you; I'd rather chew bubble gum off the side walk.

Pretty disgusting as far as I am concerned.

Again ---- Hateway Pundit. Tweeter. Fake headline, fake thread title.

As just noted, it sure doesn't take much.

Sure it’s not true, I tend to believe the

The slut doesn't even write for SNL.
SNL Writer Offers Blowj*bs in Exchange for Someone Punching a Covington Catholic Student in the Face

UPDATE: An SNL writer has responded to this story by saying that Sarah Beattie does not write for them — despite her claims of being a contributor. Stolen valor in comedy?


Josh Patten@thejoshpatten
· 8h
Replying to @CassandraRules
She doesn’t write for SNL. Thanks in advance for the correction!


DDD@Dumoulin55

She sat on a panel of 3 to discuss the 50 funniest women of all time...In her little bio it says "those who listen to our podcast know how proud we are to welcome writer & SNL contributor Sarah Beattie (@nachosarah) to the panel! http://underscoopfire.com/the-50-funniest-women-of-all-time/ …

11
2:57 PM - Jan 22, 2019
Now SNL is going to roll the credits of their writers at the end of every show:

Due to her claims of working for them when she doesn’t, the show will now “clear up this confusion by scrolling a list of the writers’ names at the end of every show.”

The lady is pretty confused, I wouldn't trust her though, you smack a kid in the face and will wind up in jail and with all her lies, you won't even get a look let alone a BJ. Better put a watch on Clinton, he loves his bjs as long as Hillary doesn't give it to him, that seems to repulse him.

"SHE is pretty confused"?

Why don't you show the class where this person ever claimed to be an SNL writer. As you just claimed.

Read several stories, I don’t care whether you believe it or not, not my problem.

 

[aaronleland]

This woman is a genius. I don't care about this story one way or another, but I'd punch a kid for a free blowjob.

 

[Slade3200]

I think everybody played a part in the problem, especially the Israelites who appeared to be the instigators and who also got little to no coverage

Yet youre only complaining that a kid smiled awkwardly. Not one mention of the racism hurled against these kids. Jesus Christ man.

That’s not what I’m only complaining about, not at all. You need to paint it that way to try and win an argument but you’re just showing an inability to tell the truth or follow the conversation.

Quote anything youve said up to this point in regards to the racism thrown at the kids. Lets see if youre an honest person or not.

I didn’t hear any racist remarks thrown at the kids nor did I deny it happened, I wasn’t there. I did say that the Hebrew Israelites seemed to be the instigators and the media went straight towards attacking the maga hats instead of showing the whole story.

What’s your objective unbiased take been on the situation Godboy?

Thats ALL you said about the racism, yet youve posted how many times criticizing the kid? Youre garbage.

Like I said I didn’t hear anything racist said to them from the videos I watch and I sure as hell am not going to take your word for it. Everything else I’ve discussed was in the co text of the conversation I was engaged in.

Did I miss where you showcased your objective quotes and analysis critiquing all sides of this situation? Or did you pussyfoot away from answering that one?

 

[Slade3200]

That exactly what you do. When two groups are clashing you get inbetween and defuse.

Not unless you have a badge... And know what you're doing. In any case this is not about the Indian...it's about the media lie. The old man will be fine... Except for being a valor thief. It's the media and the archdiocese that will have to worry about legal problems coming their way because they are certainly coming. personally I would have shoved the drum paddle up his ass for swinging it 6 inches from my face. You don't difffuse something by provoking one of the sides. But then again that's why you leave it to the professionals.



Jo

Again, the native Americans were not provoking. Just be honest!!! I do agree with you about the media messing this whole thing up and blowing it way out of proportion

Nobody is charging the Indians with anything the media of the archdiocese are charging the high school kids with bullying; that was a lie and still is a lie. It also constitutes willful libel and I believe we will see this case in court. Both the media and the archdiocese could be liable for financial damages.

Jo

I agree. Let’s just be real, the black Hebrew Israelites and the kids were yelling back-and-forth at each other. From the sounds of things the Israelites were being pretty nasty. The Native Americans got in front of the kids to try and de-escalate. Some of the kids are being jerks, like the one that stared down the old timer. The media blew it way out of proportion and targeted the Maga hats

It's obvious you refused to watch the Blaze video with the tick tock review of events. Anything you say in this thread can be labeled uninformed bullshit.

I watched your other video and I heard Becks take on the situation from his radio show earlier. I’m hear to engage in a discussion not watch 24 minute videos making a case for you. Use your brain and formulate arguments of your own. You don’t need to reference long ass videos of other people’s opinions to answer direct questions

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There was a problem between the Nation of Islam black activists and the high school students. Injun Joe was watching from a distance and read it wrong apparently. The students did not respond to the provocation from the black activists. For some unknown reason injun Joe the valor thief decided that the high school kids who were already under verbal assault needed to be pushed back. That of course was not his job. His actions were not what I would call peaceful. The young man refused to be intimidated. I guess he was supposed cower and run.

Jo

Again, the provocating group was Hebrew Israelites, not Nation of Islam, they are completely opposite. Details dude, details!

The native Americans were not aggressive, they were not taunting and they were not bullying. They moved in to try and deescalate. I wasn’t there but it makes sense that they would try and diffuse the lesser threatening of the two groups which was obviously the kids.

The native Americans were not aggressive, they were not taunting and they were not bullying. They moved in to try and deescalate.

Why didn't they get in the faces of the black guys shouting profanities? You know, to deescalate....

I don’t know ask them. But I can tell you if I were there I’d try and calm the kids down. Less chance of violence. Of course I’m a high school coach so I’m used to dealing with over aggressive adolescents.

Who would you approach?

But I can tell you if I were there I’d try and calm the kids down.

I didn't hear that the white kids were shouting profanities.
It sounded like the white kids were calm.
Did you hear otherwise?

Less chance of violence.

Yeah, the ***** got in the face of the calm white kids, not the angry black guys.

The calm white kids? Ok buddy... watch the video, the situation escalated. Who would you get infront of to diffuse?

The calm white kids?

Yes, compared to the nutty, screaming, foul-mouthed black "Hebrews".

Who would you get infront of to diffuse[sic]?

Nobody asked him to defuse by standing 4 inches in front of a kid pounding his stupid drum.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There was a problem between the Nation of Islam black activists and the high school students. Injun Joe was watching from a distance and read it wrong apparently. The students did not respond to the provocation from the black activists. For some unknown reason injun Joe the valor thief decided that the high school kids who were already under verbal assault needed to be pushed back. That of course was not his job. His actions were not what I would call peaceful. The young man refused to be intimidated. I guess he was supposed cower and run.

Jo

Again, the provocating group was Hebrew Israelites, not Nation of Islam, they are completely opposite. Details dude, details!

The native Americans were not aggressive, they were not taunting and they were not bullying. They moved in to try and deescalate. I wasn’t there but it makes sense that they would try and diffuse the lesser threatening of the two groups which was obviously the kids.

The native Americans were not aggressive, they were not taunting and they were not bullying. They moved in to try and deescalate.

Why didn't they get in the faces of the black guys shouting profanities? You know, to deescalate....

I don’t know ask them. But I can tell you if I were there I’d try and calm the kids down. Less chance of violence. Of course I’m a high school coach so I’m used to dealing with over aggressive adolescents.

Who would you approach?

I would approach the over-aggressive adolescents... Unfortunately there weren't any of those there.

Jo

That’s a matter of opinion. They sure as hell weren’t calm reserved adolescents. If you’ve spent any time around high schoolers you’d know what I mean when I say over aggressive. They like to push the limits and egg eachother on, that’s what they do, I see it every day. I did it when I was a kid. Nobody crossed the line from what I saw but the stare down was a little much. If that were my kid he’d be spending some time cleaning toilets for a while.

Nobody crossed the line from what I saw but the stare down was a little much.

Yeah, how dare that kid stare at the nut job that invaded his personal space.
That would have gotten him scalped 500 years ago, eh paleface?