SMOKING GUN: Biden's Mail-in votes CATESTROPHICALLY fail Benford test in Atlanta, even though his election day votes, advanced votes and provisional v

[Muhammed]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is,

^
Obvious projection.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I did comment on the OP, the Benford test is WORTHLESS for elections.

Moving the goalposts, naturally.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

Care to comment on the op, or are you just going to mindlessly parrot your Left wing bullshit opinion?

I did comment on the OP, the Benford test is WORTHLESS for elections.

A study called “Benford’s Law and the Detection of Election Fraud”, published in 2011 by Joseph Deckert, Mikhail Myagkov, Professor of Political Science at the University of Oregon (here) and Peter Ordeshook, Professor of Political Science at Caltech (here), found that Benford’s Law was “problematical at best” when applied to elections: “We find that conformity with and deviations from Benford's Law follow no pattern. […] Its “success rate” either way is essentially equivalent to a toss of a coin, thereby rendering it problematical at best as a forensic tool and wholly misleading at worst.” (here)

1: That paper only concerns the FIRST DIGIT (no one argues against the 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits of a Benford test for election data).

2: That paper only concerns data from voting districts that are purposely segregated and cordoned to yield between 300-700 voters per district.

3: That paper only concerns small sample sizes.

So:

1: They all pass Benford tests on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits (except Biden's mail in's, which fail all four).

2: Atlanta districts vary from 50 votes to 3000 votes.

3: We have a sample size of 1041.

 

[edthecynic]

For those who don't know what the Benford Curve is, google it.
method of weeding out irregularities in elections around the world.

LIAR! You just made that crap up!
In elections it is no more accurate than a coin toss, and nobody knows that better than you.

Um no. Unlike you, I try to educate myself.

You on the other hand have nothing but to call people liars in lieu of an actual point.

Another LIE! If you had actuall;y tried to educate yourself you would have known that the Benford test is no more accurate than a flip of a coin in elections. It is as wrong as often as it is right, but educated as you are, you knew that already, which makes you a PREMEDITATED serial LIAR.

Hahhahahahahahah!

You know nothing. And I am not about to waste my time trying to educate you on how the Benford test works.

You sir, are well outside 5 standard deviations of a fully functioning brain, my friend.

You don't even know what a standard deviation is, IDIOT.
You can't educate me about something you know nothing about.

See the thing is, I can look it up. Easy enough for me right? I actually want to know things. I don't mindlessly parrot LIAR LIAR on a forum like you do, rookie.

Nope, impossible for you as Trumpists NEVER look anything up because they are afraid of what they might find. For example, you said to google Benford's law but you obviously didn't or you would have found out just how useless it is for proving fraud in an election, which is what I found when I googled it!!!!!

 

[RodISHI]

Thank you 2A.

 

[22lcidw]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

So called Trump Nazis not being professional disruptors of our government like Prog Socialists because they want a new type of government is as mindless as it gets. With Progs it is not about improving the government.

 

[edthecynic]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

Care to comment on the op, or are you just going to mindlessly parrot your Left wing bullshit opinion?

I did comment on the OP, the Benford test is WORTHLESS for elections.

A study called “Benford’s Law and the Detection of Election Fraud”, published in 2011 by Joseph Deckert, Mikhail Myagkov, Professor of Political Science at the University of Oregon (here) and Peter Ordeshook, Professor of Political Science at Caltech (here), found that Benford’s Law was “problematical at best” when applied to elections: “We find that conformity with and deviations from Benford's Law follow no pattern. […] Its “success rate” either way is essentially equivalent to a toss of a coin, thereby rendering it problematical at best as a forensic tool and wholly misleading at worst.” (here)

1: That paper only concerns the FIRST DIGIT (no one argues against the 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits of a Benford test for election data).

2: That paper only concerns data from voting districts that are purposely segregated and cordoned to yield between 300-700 voters per district.

3: That paper only concerns small sample sizes.

So:

1: They all pass Benford tests on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits (except Biden's mail in's, which fail all four).

2: Atlanta districts vary from 50 votes to 3000 votes.

3: We have a sample size of 1041.

Talk about moving goal posts!

The academic and digital research coalition Election Integrity Partnership also cautioned against the conclusion that deviation from Benford’s Law is evidence of election fraud (here). It pointed out that for the law to hold, all numbers must be equally likely to appear and the numbers must span multiple orders of magnitude (eg. Range from 100 to 10,000,000). They say that one of these conditions is not met in the election: “For vote tallies, all numbers are equally likely, but not all states meet the second assumption. In the state of Nevada, Esmeralda County has around 900 people while Clark County has over 2,250,000 people. In the state of Vermont, the bounds are much narrower.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

The academic and digital research coalition Election Integrity Partnership also cautioned against the conclusion that deviation from Benford’s Law is evidence of election fraud (here). It pointed out that for the law to hold, all numbers must be equally likely to appear and the numbers must span multiple orders of magnitude (eg. Range from 100 to 10,000,000). They say that one of these conditions is not met in the election: “For vote tallies, all numbers are equally likely, but not all states meet the second assumption. In the state of Nevada, Esmeralda County has around 900 people while Clark County has over 2,250,000 people. In the state of Vermont, the bounds are much narrower.

So, why did they all pass, except the Biden mail ins?

Tell it to the judge!

You also purposely ignored the 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits.

No one argues against the 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits.

The "warnings" you're linking are only for the first digit test.

In fact, are you aware that there isn't any dataset of natural counts that can violate the 2nd, 3rd or 4th tests, be it the count of squirrels in every country, the count of bacteria strains in different oceanic regions or the count of Klingon votes for the Supreme Chancellor of Galafrey?

Benford's Law will still hold for 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits in all natural counting data.

 

[edthecynic]

The academic and digital research coalition Election Integrity Partnership also cautioned against the conclusion that deviation from Benford’s Law is evidence of election fraud (here). It pointed out that for the law to hold, all numbers must be equally likely to appear and the numbers must span multiple orders of magnitude (eg. Range from 100 to 10,000,000). They say that one of these conditions is not met in the election: “For vote tallies, all numbers are equally likely, but not all states meet the second assumption. In the state of Nevada, Esmeralda County has around 900 people while Clark County has over 2,250,000 people. In the state of Vermont, the bounds are much narrower.

So, why did they all pass, except the Biden mail ins?

Tell it to the judge!

Because your post is a FAKE!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

If you know what it is, I would like to hear your comments on it. Have you done the analysis?

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

 

[edthecynic]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

If you know what it is, I would like to hear your comments on it. Have you done the analysis?

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

You don't know what it is, so how would you know if an analysis was fake or not?

 

[Crepitus]

Bah, we're not supposed to be nerds, just stupid rednecks. ... Right?

For those who don't know what the Benford Curve is, google it. It is a tried and true method of weeding out irregularities in elections around the world.

Not elections, accounting fraud. It has been debunked as a way of testing elections.

Fact check: Deviation from Benfordâs Law does not prove election fraud

Social media users have been sharing posts that say a mathematical rule called Benford’s Law provides clear proof of fraud in the U.S. presidential election. However, research papers and academics consulted by Reuters consistently say that deviation from Benford’s Law does not prove election...

www.reuters.com

 

[two_iron]

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Bah, we're not supposed to be nerds, just stupid rednecks. ... Right?

For those who don't know what the Benford Curve is, google it. It is a tried and true method of weeding out irregularities in elections around the world.

Not elections, accounting fraud. It has been debunked as a way of testing elections.

Are you aware that there isn't any dataset of natural counts that can violate the 2nd, 3rd or 4th tests, be it the count of squirrels in every country, the count of bacteria strains in different oceanic regions or the count of Klingon votes for the Supreme Chancellor of Galafrey?

Are you aware the "debunked" punchline you commies keep using only concerns the 1st digit (and only under particular circumstances)?

There is no argument against using 2nd, 3rd and 4th digit Benford tests for elections, nor will there ever be. Biden failed all digits catastrophically on his mail in vote (yet passed them all on his regular in person votes, advanced votes and provisional).

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

If you know what it is, I would like to hear your comments on it. Have you done the analysis?

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

You don't know what it is, so how would you know if an analysis was fake or not?

I know exactly what it is, you fucking kuuunt. That's the problem with you faggots. You assume we can't read. I will compare sheepskins with your gay ass ANY DAY!!!! Take your arrogant little ass the fuck outta here, you little shit.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

If you know what it is, I would like to hear your comments on it. Have you done the analysis?

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

You don't know what it is, so how would you know if an analysis was fake or not?

I know exactly what it is, you fucking kuuunt. That's the problem with you faggots. You assume we can't read. I will compare sheepskins with your gay ass ANY DAY!!!! Take your arrogant little ass the fuck outta here, you little shit.

Notice they keep saying "debunked" about every link to 2020 election fraud, and they linking the same "debunked" titles on Benford as well, while purposely ignoring those papers only concern the 1st digit for districts that are intentionally segregated for regular totals.

Very few argue against the generalized 1st digit test, and no one argues with the 2nd, 3rd or 4th digit test (for elections).

These posters in this thread are purposely ignoring that Atlanta's districts are not segregated to yield uniform totals (the uniform totals are spread smoothly from 50 to 3200 across the 1100ish districts), and purposely ignoring that Biden's mail fails the 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits tests.

They are also ignoring that all the other tallies, including Biden's in person, advanced and provisional pass the tests on all digits.

ONLY THE MAIL INS FAIL! WOWOWOWOWOWO

Combine this with the fact that Biden's Advanced Votes are roughly the same as his Mail in Votes (give or take 10% in each district), yet his Advanced Votes PASS the benford test on all digits, and his Mail votes FAIL on all digits! There's NO WAY TO SPIN IT!

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

If you know what it is, I would like to hear your comments on it. Have you done the analysis?

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

You don't know what it is, so how would you know if an analysis was fake or not?

I know exactly what it is, you fucking kuuunt. That's the problem with you faggots. You assume we can't read. I will compare sheepskins with your gay ass ANY DAY!!!! Take your arrogant little ass the fuck outta here, you little shit.

Notice they keep saying "debunked" about every link to 2020 election fraud, and they linking the same "debunked" titles on Benford as well, while purposely ignoring those papers only concern the 1st digit for districts that are intentionally segregated for regular totals.

Very few argue against the generalized 1st digit test, and no one argues with the 2nd, 3rd or 4th digit test (for elections).

Yep. Not one goddamn rational argument. Nothing but a bunch of "Trumper's are stupid" and "debunked."

Bunch of mindless little fucking faggots.

 

[edthecynic]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

If you know what it is, I would like to hear your comments on it. Have you done the analysis?

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

You don't know what it is, so how would you know if an analysis was fake or not?

I know exactly what it is, you fucking kuuunt. That's the problem with you faggots. You assume we can't read. I will compare sheepskins with your gay ass ANY DAY!!!! Take your arrogant little ass the fuck outta here, you little shit.

Grow up, CHILD!!!!!

 

[edthecynic]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

If you know what it is, I would like to hear your comments on it. Have you done the analysis?

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

You don't know what it is, so how would you know if an analysis was fake or not?

I know exactly what it is, you fucking kuuunt. That's the problem with you faggots. You assume we can't read. I will compare sheepskins with your gay ass ANY DAY!!!! Take your arrogant little ass the fuck outta here, you little shit.

Notice they keep saying "debunked" about every link to 2020 election fraud, and they linking the same "debunked" titles on Benford as well, while purposely ignoring those papers only concern the 1st digit for districts that are intentionally segregated for regular totals.

Very few argue against the generalized 1st digit test, and no one argues with the 2nd, 3rd or 4th digit test (for elections).

These posters in this thread are purposely ignoring that Atlanta's districts are not segregated to yield uniform totals (the uniform totals are spread smoothly from 50 to 3200 across the 1100ish districts), and purposely ignoring that Biden's mail fails the 2nd, 3rd and 4th digits tests.

They are also ignoring that all the other tallies, including Biden's in person, advanced and provisional pass the tests on all digits.

ONLY THE MAIL INS FAIL! WOWOWOWOWOWO

Combine this with the fact that Biden's Advanced Votes are roughly the same as his Mail in Votes (give or take 10% in each district), yet his Advanced Votes PASS the benford test on all digits, and his Mail votes FAIL on all digits! There's NO WAY TO SPIN IT!

BDS!

 

[edthecynic]

Trump Nazis don't even know what a Benford test is, they are just mindlessly parroting Right-wing BULLSHIT!

If you know what it is, I would like to hear your comments on it. Have you done the analysis?

Otherwise, shut the fuck up.

You don't know what it is, so how would you know if an analysis was fake or not?

I know exactly what it is, you fucking kuuunt. That's the problem with you faggots. You assume we can't read. I will compare sheepskins with your gay ass ANY DAY!!!! Take your arrogant little ass the fuck outta here, you little shit.

Notice they keep saying "debunked" about every link to 2020 election fraud, and they linking the same "debunked" titles on Benford as well, while purposely ignoring those papers only concern the 1st digit for districts that are intentionally segregated for regular totals.

Very few argue against the generalized 1st digit test, and no one argues with the 2nd, 3rd or 4th digit test (for elections).

Yep. Not one goddamn rational argument. Nothing but a bunch of "Trumper's are stupid" and "debunked."

Bunch of mindless little fucking faggots.

BDS!