Smithsonian Black Museum Leaves Out Justice Thomas, Anita Hill Glorified

[Weatherman2020]

Pathetic. Tells you the kind of BS history is in that museum.

Justice Clarence Thomas, the second black man to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, is practically absent from the new National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Anita Hill, the woman who accused Thomas of sexual harassment, however, is given prominent billing in the museum.

The new Smithsonian, which opened in September, gives Hill pride of place in an exhibit on blacks in the 1990s. The exhibit features testimonies trumpeting her courage and the surge of women’s activism that ensued, while making only peripheral reference to the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice.

There is no showcase of Thomas’s own life and career, which ran its own harsh gauntlet of racial discrimination.

Keep reading…

 

[owebo]

They left this out too...

 

[guno]

Pathetic. Tells you the kind of BS history is in that museum.

Justice Clarence Thomas, the second black man to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, is practically absent from the new National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Anita Hill, the woman who accused Thomas of sexual harassment, however, is given prominent billing in the museum.

The new Smithsonian, which opened in September, gives Hill pride of place in an exhibit on blacks in the 1990s. The exhibit features testimonies trumpeting her courage and the surge of women’s activism that ensued, while making only peripheral reference to the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice.

There is no showcase of Thomas’s own life and career, which ran its own harsh gauntlet of racial discrimination.

Keep reading…

Mybe one day they will have a uncle tom or Oreo wing, then Thomas can be prominently displayed

 

[owebo]

Pathetic. Tells you the kind of BS history is in that museum.

Justice Clarence Thomas, the second black man to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, is practically absent from the new National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Anita Hill, the woman who accused Thomas of sexual harassment, however, is given prominent billing in the museum.

The new Smithsonian, which opened in September, gives Hill pride of place in an exhibit on blacks in the 1990s. The exhibit features testimonies trumpeting her courage and the surge of women’s activism that ensued, while making only peripheral reference to the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice.

There is no showcase of Thomas’s own life and career, which ran its own harsh gauntlet of racial discrimination.

Keep reading…

Mybe one day they will have a uncle tom or Oreo wing, then Thomas can be prominently displayed

A Racist democrat....he h....

 

[Jackson]

Pathetic. Tells you the kind of BS history is in that museum.

Justice Clarence Thomas, the second black man to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, is practically absent from the new National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Anita Hill, the woman who accused Thomas of sexual harassment, however, is given prominent billing in the museum.

The new Smithsonian, which opened in September, gives Hill pride of place in an exhibit on blacks in the 1990s. The exhibit features testimonies trumpeting her courage and the surge of women’s activism that ensued, while making only peripheral reference to the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice.

There is no showcase of Thomas’s own life and career, which ran its own harsh gauntlet of racial discrimination.

Keep reading…

Mybe one day they will have a uncle tom or Oreo wing, then Thomas can be prominently displayed

So, the entries into the walls of the museum depends on their politics rather than their accomplishments. Got it.

 

[Theowl32]

Hmmmm, who was it that called it by its appropriate name?

The ALL BLACKS ARE VICTIMS OF WHITES museum.

In other words (for the slower morons on the left) it is yet another piece of leftist victimology propaganda. That is it and that is all.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

 

[Jackson]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

So, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

So, what was Anita Hill's position or act of note? No one even believed her.

Maybe that's why there are only 2 small captions in the Museum that involve her in any way and just a split second in a video montage

 

[Eloy]

Justice Clarence Thomas is a lazy lump.

 

[martybegan]

Pathetic. Tells you the kind of BS history is in that museum.

Justice Clarence Thomas, the second black man to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, is practically absent from the new National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Anita Hill, the woman who accused Thomas of sexual harassment, however, is given prominent billing in the museum.

The new Smithsonian, which opened in September, gives Hill pride of place in an exhibit on blacks in the 1990s. The exhibit features testimonies trumpeting her courage and the surge of women’s activism that ensued, while making only peripheral reference to the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice.

There is no showcase of Thomas’s own life and career, which ran its own harsh gauntlet of racial discrimination.

Keep reading…

Mybe one day they will have a uncle tom or Oreo wing, then Thomas can be prominently displayed

What a bigoted twat you are.

 

[martybegan]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

Nice that you found some technical quibble to justify your hatred of the man that is purely ideological.

 

[xband]

Highly respected Supreme Court Justice Thomas is defamed the radical left black community for being a house nigga.

 

[Rustic]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

Bed wetter

 

[TheOldSchool]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

Nice that you found some technical quibble to justify your hatred of the man that is purely ideological.

Technical quibble? Going through the motions and half-assing your job for 25 years is a "technical quibble?"

 

[TheOldSchool]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

Bed wetter

Is he? I wouldn't be surprised at his age and all.

 

[martybegan]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

Nice that you found some technical quibble to justify your hatred of the man that is purely ideological.

Technical quibble? Going through the motions and half-assing your job for 25 years is a "technical quibble?"

So basically you ignore the tons of paperwork he reviews, which is actually what he is supposed to base his decision on, right? All those briefs, pleadings, friend of the court filings, etc?

yes, it's a technical quibble.

 

[Rustic]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

Bed wetter

Is he? I wouldn't be surprised at his age and all.

 

[TheOldSchool]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

Nice that you found some technical quibble to justify your hatred of the man that is purely ideological.

Technical quibble? Going through the motions and half-assing your job for 25 years is a "technical quibble?"

So basically you ignore the tons of paperwork he reviews, which is actually what he is supposed to base his decision on, right? All those briefs, pleadings, friend of the court filings, etc?

yes, it's a technical quibble.

For all we know, he ignores all that too. He just nodded yes to Scalia for 25 years. He'll probably retire soon now that he's required to feign interest in cases with Scalia gone.

 

[Jarhead]

Thomas went 25 years in the supreme court without asking a single question. Why should he receive a place of prominence for being bad at his job? He wasn't even the first black SC justice.

Because we, as Americans, have the highest regards for the highest legal entity in the land.

Or has that sentiment left us as well?

Oh yeah, that's right...Obama found it appropriate to disparage them during his State of the Union Address.

I forgot.....Obama made this a new land....you know...hope and change...;