Smith's patience has expired.

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That means he says he knows he's going to lose and is trying a workaround to double jeopardy laws.

Uh, what is this insane nonsense?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They didn't like him politically.

Oh the lies the desperate cultists have to tell themselves....

 

[Blaster]

Smith is a Democrat operative and should step down.

 

[Billiejeens]

Yep, stellar.

Your orange God is internationally reviled and is a punchline.

Jack Smith is globally respected and is at the top of his field.

But you cultists enjoy slumming with the orange slob.

You know that you are delusional
You have to know.

 

[Lisa558]

Smith is a Democrat operative and should step down.

All of the prosecutors are. In the Georgia case, they coordinated with the Biden White House.

 

[WEATHER53]

While Turley is a full-blown left-winger personally, the Democrat Cult kicked him out of the group for explaining the law without prejudice.
Mortal sin in the Cult Community.

Yes he was a darling but when he started espousing legal fact and thought, they disowned him

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You know that you are delusional
You have to know.

You are long on vapid crybabying, but quite short on argument and evidence. As always.

 

[eagle7-31]

Special Counsel Jack Smith Is Done With Judge Aileen Cannon And Lets It Show

In a new filing that bluntly confronts U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, Special Counsel Jack Smith takes a new tone of incredulousness and disdain for her mishandling of the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case.

The issue at hand is her failure to have yet ruled on Donald Trump’s motion to dismiss based on his inane, unprecedented, and counterfactual reading of the Presidential Records Act. Instead of rejecting the argument out of hand, Cannon not only is entertaining it but ordered the two sides to propose jury instructions based on two different deeply flawed interpretations of the PRA.

That set up an nearly impossible challenge for Smith: How do you draft jury instructions that are so wrong on the law without looking like an idiot, undermining your own case, and pissing of the judge?

The answer: You can’t.

So Smith went all in, no longer trying to placate, educate, or hand-hold Cannon.

Smith ripped her interpretations of the PRA: “both of the Court’s scenarios are fundamentally flawed and any jury instructions that reflect those scenarios would be error.” He said her “legal premise is wrong” and her requested jury instructions “would distort the trial.”
Special Counsel Jack Smith Loses Patience With Judge Aileen Cannon

Not a great idea to antagonize a Trump toady but some things need to be done. She's made it clear she is unqualified to be on this case from the standpoint of experience, an understanding of the law, and a lack of impartiality. Good for Smith that he has called her out.

Its not Smith's court, its Cannon's. Smith does not run the show.

 

[Billiejeens]

Its not Smith's court, its Cannon's. Smith does not run the show.

These leftists are nutsy crackers

 

[Rumpole]

She needs to hold him in contempt and toss him off the case.

He hasn't violated any order by her, so she can't. She, however, has got the law wrong, and she will be held accountable for it, very soon.

 

[Rumpole]

Why are you so ashamed that you believe Trump carjacked the Secret Service? The DemoKKKrat party depends on your incurious stupidity.

Don't let them down.

Actually, the KKK loves Trump. I wonder why. Something to do with vermins.

 

[Rumpole]

No, just another dumb bingo bitch threatening a judge, as you, being a fellow bingo bitch, cheer. Enjoy Smith getting his ass kicked again. November will not be kind to you you impotent cuck.

I don't think you really understand the facts in the docs case.

 

[Rumpole]

~~~~~~
Aux Contraire:

‘No white knight’: Jack Smith’s record rife with mistrials, overturned convictions, judicial rebukes

Special counsel Jack Smith, who has brought federal charges against former President Donald Trump, is an “overzealous” prosecutor who relies on ethically dubious tactics, including media leaks and enticing witnesses, say those who have been caught in his snare.

www.washingtontimes.com

**********​

Jack Smith's Long History of Failed Prosecution Cases Against Republicans

townhall.com

Failed prosecutions isn't a valid measure of a prosecutor. It just means he's willing to take on tough cases, so naturally his failed stats are going to be higher than the wimps who only take slam dunks.

But no right wing rag is going to tell you the truth.

 

[Rumpole]

Jack Smith doesn't make decisions, Judges do...

So how did he have them overturned...

You also accused of being a Liberal. Can you show proof?

Jack Smith has only said that his job is to prosecute Criminals... At the moment he is in court with Trump... Considering Smiths conviction rate, Trump is going to be found guilty...

Trump is a Fucking Criminal, it is only a matter of time...

Trump is running for President because he knows he will loose in Court and be a convicted criminal. He is not out to clear his name and be exonerated. He wants to stop the prosecution. His tactic now is delay until he becomes President...

Jack Smith files appeals to a higher court who are far more competent on the law than Cannon is. She's a novice. He will have the upper hand, and the reason is she is in egregious violation of the law.

 

[WEATHER53]

His witch hunting is next issue about to expire

 

[Rumpole]

Calling the judge’s ruling “clearly erroneous” attacks her competence, her integrity, or both.

It doesn't attack her 'integrity' it attacks her competence and knowledge of the law,. which, -clearly, is inferior and needs to be attacked.

Why do think a TDS sufferer posted that Smith had “Jacked her up,” or whatever pun he made?

TDS = thought - terminating cliche. Invalid argument.

 

[Seymour Flops]

It doesn't attack her 'integrity' it attacks her competence and knowledge of the law,. which, -clearly, is inferior and needs to be attacked.

I said it was one or the other, or both.

So, Smith is responsible for the death threats?

TDS = thought - terminating cliche. Invalid argument.

That would be TTC.

 

[Aldo Raine]

She needs to hold him in contempt and toss him off the case.

Yes, that is EXACTLY what she should try to do!
MAGA

 

[Doc7505]

Judge Cannon Rejects Jack Smith’s Demands of Her Jury Instruction Order ​

as “Unprecedented and Unjust”​

Judge Cannon Rejects Jack Smith's Demands of Her Jury Instruction Order as "Unprecedented and Unjust" | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday rejected Trump’s motion to dismiss the classified documents case based on the Presidential Records Act.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

5 Apr 2024 ~~ By Cristina Laila

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday rejected Trump’s motion to dismiss the classified documents case based on the Presidential Records Act.
In February Trump’s legal team filed several motions to dismiss Jack Smith’s classified documents case.
Cannon has now denied two of Trump’s motions to dismiss Jack Smith’s lawfare case playing out in a federal court in Florida.
~Snip~
Last month Judge Aileen Cannon issued a jury instruction order in Jack Smith’s classified documents case and the leftist legal analysts went apocalyptic.
Cannon gave two options for jury instructions.
~Snip~
Jordan Rubin said Cannon is “apparently contemplating instructions that could effectively win Trump’s case for him…”
Jack Smith threatened to take the jury instruction fight to the appellate court.

​

Commentary:
what a novel idea from a judge , let the jury see and hear the evidence of the case.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden skates on worse charges because he is "too old and feeble" to stand trial, but is STILL occupying the office of POTUS?
Biden as Senator, or Vice President, wasn't authorized to take them much less store them in his garage next to the Corvette, and especially not unsecured in boxes in the garage with a crack head living there, or other unsecured locations like China Town or U.Penn.
Amongst all this is the SCOTUS is the coming rule on the Constitutionality of Smith's Appointment. That question has been attached to the Presidential Immunity Pleading awaiting a Ruling.

 

[berg80]

Judge Cannon Rejects Jack Smith’s Demands of Her Jury Instruction Order ​

as “Unprecedented and Unjust”​

Judge Cannon Rejects Jack Smith's Demands of Her Jury Instruction Order as "Unprecedented and Unjust" | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday rejected Trump’s motion to dismiss the classified documents case based on the Presidential Records Act.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

5 Apr 2024 ~~ By Cristina Laila

Judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday rejected Trump’s motion to dismiss the classified documents case based on the Presidential Records Act.
In February Trump’s legal team filed several motions to dismiss Jack Smith’s classified documents case.
Cannon has now denied two of Trump’s motions to dismiss Jack Smith’s lawfare case playing out in a federal court in Florida.
~Snip~
Last month Judge Aileen Cannon issued a jury instruction order in Jack Smith’s classified documents case and the leftist legal analysts went apocalyptic.
Cannon gave two options for jury instructions.
~Snip~
Jordan Rubin said Cannon is “apparently contemplating instructions that could effectively win Trump’s case for him…”
Jack Smith threatened to take the jury instruction fight to the appellate court.

​

Commentary:
what a novel idea from a judge , let the jury see and hear the evidence of the case.
Meanwhile, Joe Biden skates on worse charges because he is "too old and feeble" to stand trial, but is STILL occupying the office of POTUS?
Biden as Senator, or Vice President, wasn't authorized to take them much less store them in his garage next to the Corvette, and especially not unsecured in boxes in the garage with a crack head living there, or other unsecured locations like China Town or U.Penn.
Amongst all this is the SCOTUS is the coming rule on the Constitutionality of Smith's Appointment. That question has been attached to the Presidential Immunity Pleading awaiting a Ruling.

She asked for jury instructions regarding each side's interpretation of the PRA. There is no place for the PRA in this case.

“What she has asked the parties to do is very, very troubling,” Nancy Gertner, a former federal judge in Massachusetts, said of Cannon. “She is giving credence to arguments that are on their face absurd. She is ignoring a raft of other motions, equally absurd, that are unreasonably delaying the case.”

“The PRA is just not relevant here in any way it all; it provides no defense. To even allow it to be argued at trial would create confusion for the jury,” said Barbara McQuade, a law professor at the University of Michigan and a former U.S. attorney.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati.../20/trump-cannon-judge-pra-jury-instructions/

In response, Smith said Cannon was pursuing a “fundamentally flawed legal premise” that the law somehow overrides Section 793 of the Espionage Act, which Trump is accused of violating by stashing hundreds of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida home and private club, after his presidency ended.
“That legal premise is wrong, and a jury instruction for Section 793 that reflects that premise would distort the trial,” Smith wrote. The Presidential Records Act, he said, “should not play any role at trial at all.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2024/04/03/trump-documents-case-cannon-jack-smith/