Six Visas Revoked Due to Hateful Charlie Kirk Comments

When and also where do you draw the line? Is this protected speech?


The courts have made a lot of rulings about this very issue and the answer is they make a very high bar for what is considered incitement to violence.

It’s worked pretty well so far, but we see the enemies of free speech trying to walk it back now.
 
Maybe they do, but they could have perfectly justifiable reasons.

To be eligible for a visa, do people now have to be right wing?

Nope, but I dont think its such a good idea to bring people into the country who harbor hate for its citizens, whether those citizens are on the left or the right.
 
Nope, but I dont think its such a good idea to bring people into the country who harbor hate for its citizens, whether those citizens are on the left or the right.
What if someone says they hate Jeffrey Epstein and are glad he is dead?
 
What if someone says they hate Jeffrey Epstein and are glad he is dead?

if epstein hadn't been a pedo,, then id say he shouldn't be hated.

But youre trying to muddy the waters by conflating hating a known child predator with hating entire groups of people.

The two are not the same
 
if epstein hadn't been a pedo,, then id say he shouldn't be hated.

But youre trying to muddy the waters by conflating hating a known child predator with hating entire groups of people.

The two are not the same
They didn’t hate an entire group of people. They hated Charlie Kirk. Maybe because they feel Charlie Kirk did things to deserve hatred.
 
They didn’t hate an entire group of people. They hated Charlie Kirk. Maybe because they feel Charlie Kirk did things to deserve hatred.

And im suggesting that if they hated kirk, there is a good chance they also hate others of the same ideology.
 
And im suggesting that if they hated kirk, there is a good chance they also hate others of the same ideology.
And maybe others of the same ideology also deserve hatred.

I can think of a lot of ideologies that deserve it.

Should we exclude people from the country who hate racists?
 
The courts have made a lot of rulings about this very issue and the answer is they make a very high bar for what is considered incitement to violence.

So a man saying that he envisions two bullets in the head of his opponent and his children dying in their mother's arms isn't concerning to you?
 
Yeah baby!! Now this is what I've been talking about since Charlie Kirk was assassinated. People who hate people this badly have the exact same violent rhetoric that Tyler Robinson had. Next we have to do something with the Americans who wish harm upon others like this.


OK, then let's revoke the visas of all the right wing bastards that are threatening people. Goose and gander situation. Charlie Kirk was a right wing flap yapper, hardly anyone of importance. We have right wingers constantly threatening ex-Presidents and our elected representative. Time to apply the same to them.
 
In what way?

It's politically stupid. By doing this you are accomplishing little to nothing and paying a huge cost. That cost being giving your political opposition easy talking points which are hard for you to defend. Is what they did "legal"? Sure but it's not easily explained and the average person looking at this doesnt know that and isnt likely to figure it out either and even if they do they wont seen the utility in doing this.
 
So a man saying that he envisions two bullets in the head of his opponent and his children dying in their mother's arms isn't concerning to you?
It’s protected speech. We’ve seen far worse from republicans.
 
And maybe others of the same ideology also deserve hatred.

I can think of a lot of ideologies that deserve it.

Should we exclude people from the country who hate racists?
Only if they go around saying so. They are guests. Sit down. Shut up. Or go home.
 
OK, then let's revoke the visas of all the right wing bastards that are threatening people. Goose and gander situation. Charlie Kirk was a right wing flap yapper, hardly anyone of importance. We have right wingers constantly threatening ex-Presidents and our elected representative. Time to apply the same to them.

That's nothing but a bunch of lies.

It’s protected speech. We’ve seen far worse from republicans.

Saying you envision two bullets in your opponent's head and their children dying in their mother's arms is NOT free speech. That other childish crap in the article posted was, but that is criminal and he should have been arrested for that.
 
15th post
OK, then let's revoke the visas of all the right wing bastards that are threatening people. Goose and gander situation. Charlie Kirk was a right wing flap yapper, hardly anyone of importance. We have right wingers constantly threatening ex-Presidents and our elected representative. Time to apply the same to them.
Go for it.
 
That's nothing but a bunch of lies.



Saying you envision two bullets in your opponent's head and their children dying in their mother's arms is NOT free speech. That other childish crap in the article posted was, but that is criminal and he should have been arrested for that.
No one arrested. No one was punished.
 
Saying you envision two bullets in your opponent's head and their children dying in their mother's arms is NOT free speech
It’s definitely free speech. Sorry if that makes you angry, but it is.

I mean, Charlie Kirk himself wished for the execution of Biden.
 
So a man saying that he envisions two bullets in the head of his opponent and his children dying in their mother's arms isn't concerning to you?
It's concerning but it's the Virginia candidate for AG. We can't send him home.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom