Similarities Between NAZI Party and 2020 Democrats is Uncanny!

[surada]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

There are far more similarities than you mentioned. Both the 1930's Nazis and the modern Democrat Party used violence as a tactic to silence opposition, they both sought to deprive their opposition of their basic human rights, they both used a fake victim tactic of repeating a false narrative of being victims of the opposing parties, they both practiced historical denialism and revisionism, they both used the justice system to stay in power, they both used abortion and eugenics to rid the country of undesirable racial elements.

They both used the media and movies to dehumanize their enemies (Jews, conservatives), they both were anti-Semitic, they were both warmongers, They both wanted socialized health care and put doctors on low salaries, they both created a shitload of government jobs, they both indoctrinated the youth with their agenda and beliefs, they were both staunch advocates of gun control, they were both shameless exponents of identity politics.

They were both propnents of nationalization of business, forced profit sharing, outlawing all profits during wartime, abolition of all income not earned directly from work (via high capital gains/inheritance taxes). They both believed the state should provide a "livelihood for its citizens", old age insurance funded by government, price caps, price controls, rent controls, laws against speculation,"communal" rent free living areas, an end to the "materialistic" world order, free higher education focusing on "civic affairs", humanities, and political science. They both used censorship against news media that don't tow the line, believed in the "common good" and "common interest" before individual interest, and a strong central government to make these goals come true, mainly through economic coercion and force.

Adolf Hitler said it himself in a speech he made in 1927:

"We are socialists, we are enemies of today's capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions."

Yes, I forgot a key element of ALL Socialists, which is to promise FREE STUFF. As to censorship, that has been in place for a VERY Long Time and the Democrats have added the physical threat thru ANTIFA and BLM.

Hitler didn't nationalize any companies.

Wikipedia disagrees with you...

"Nationalization under Nazi Germany was substantial. Over 500 major companies were either nationalized or absorbed by state-owned companies, one of the largest being the Hermann Göring Works (iron), mostly operated by the Nazi Party apparatus.[9]"

List of nationalizations by country - Wikipedia

from your link

Slave labour


The Salzgitter project recruited its workforce from all over Germany,[19] Austria, Italy, the Netherlands and other countries.[20] It produced its first pig iron in October 1939 and its first steel in August 1940.[19] A large metalworking plant, Stahlwerke Braunschweig, was built nearby, starting in March 1940; eventually it became one of the largest plants in the country, employing ten thousand workers.[20]

The majority of Salzgitter area staff, 47,000 workers, were non-Germans.[20] In five years, 1937 to 1942, population increased fivefold.[20] Housing was not sufficient even for native Germans; foreign workers had to live in seventy makeshift camps.[21]

The Gestapo ran an on-site concentration camp for the delinquent workers.[21] Forced labor of concentration camp prisoners was not employed until May 1944; the three camps that supplied slaves to Salzgitter contained up to 6,500 prisoners.[21] Another local camp, Drutte, supplied slave workers for the Reichswerke's ammunition plants from 1942 (see List of subcamps of Neuengamme, Celler Hasenjagd).[21] Salzgitter was the target of Allied bombings several times but damage to the plant was insignificant. Its blast furnaces operated until captured by the Americans in April 1945.[22]

 

[surada]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

The primary difference is that NAZIs were for a Germany for Germans, and some leg room relative to colonizing others. Where leftists today are much more open borders flood the country with migrants.

The Jews were German citizens.

 

[AMart]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

The primary difference is that NAZIs were for a Germany for Germans, and some leg room relative to colonizing others. Where leftists today are much more open borders flood the country with migrants.

The Jews were German citizens.

Yeah I know but the NAZIs, at least enough of them, thought otherwise. Jews were kicked out how many countries? It wasn't a new concept. Hitler hated the idea of international communism, workers can move wherever etc. He had the Antifa leader of Germany arrested and killed. The rest of them took off to the Soviet Union and Stalin had them arrested and killed.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Same thing.



View attachment 389133

ever notice that the trolls who always say trump supporters started the riots NEVER mention what happened two weeks prior where Antifa beat up women and children being cowards using the cover of the night to do so and when adults defended them and faught back the cowards retreated behind the coward police? these coward trolls here NEVER mention that little fact sense it exposes how evil their party the dems are.

 

[Justin Richardson]

The real nazi's are the trump family

Really? I could say the same for Biden. For 47 years, Biden has acted like a true Nazi.

 

[jbrownson0831]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

The real nazi's are the trump family and the loyalty oath Papa has every subordinate take to work near him. If you knew Adolf like I do you would not think, ha ha, anyone but cons are working on a peaceful coup of America.

Amazing you looneytunes libbers can live without a brain.

 

[Tax Man]

The real nazi's are the trump family

Really? I could say the same for Biden. For 47 years, Biden has acted like a true Nazi.

Trump's family was nazi associates.

 

[Rigby5]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

The primary difference is that NAZIs were for a Germany for Germans, and some leg room relative to colonizing others. Where leftists today are much more open borders flood the country with migrants.

The Jews were German citizens.

The problem was that in WWI, some Zionist German citizens were willing to sell out Germany in exchange for the Balfour Declaration.
In particular I refer to Chaim Weizmann giving the British the formula for synthetic acetone for cordite, and the stolen Zimmerman Letter about supporting Mexico against the US.

 

[frigidweirdo]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

Well, most Democrats aren't Socialists.

The NSDAP were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS, rather than Socialists. There was a bit of Socialism in there, but not really.

The NSDAP was backed by the American super rich?

The people putting the most money into US politics are Republicans, the Koch brothers (or what's left of them).

What the Nazis did in terms of brown shirts isn't anything the Democrats are doing. Those who are violent aren't "Democrats".

And the rest is equally nonsense.

Basically all it shows us is that you're willing to make stuff up for some pointless "political fight" that looks like it belongs in elementary school.

 

[Rigby5]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

Well, most Democrats aren't Socialists.

The NSDAP were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS, rather than Socialists. There was a bit of Socialism in there, but not really.

The NSDAP was backed by the American super rich?

The people putting the most money into US politics are Republicans, the Koch brothers (or what's left of them).

What the Nazis did in terms of brown shirts isn't anything the Democrats are doing. Those who are violent aren't "Democrats".

And the rest is equally nonsense.

Basically all it shows us is that you're willing to make stuff up for some pointless "political fight" that looks like it belongs in elementary school.

I would say everyone is a socialist really.
If you believe in public schools, aid to the disabled, etc., then you ARE a socialist.
If you believe in regulations against slavery, child labor, monopolies, etc., then you ARE a socialist.

Most people just don't know what socialism is, and lots of people lie and claim it means central government ownership of all means of production.

 

[themirrorthief]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

That's all completely bass-ackwards.

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

nazi...national socialist workers party

 

[themirrorthief]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

Well, most Democrats aren't Socialists.

The NSDAP were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS, rather than Socialists. There was a bit of Socialism in there, but not really.

The NSDAP was backed by the American super rich?

The people putting the most money into US politics are Republicans, the Koch brothers (or what's left of them).

What the Nazis did in terms of brown shirts isn't anything the Democrats are doing. Those who are violent aren't "Democrats".

And the rest is equally nonsense.

Basically all it shows us is that you're willing to make stuff up for some pointless "political fight" that looks like it belongs in elementary school.

the super rich are all democrats....Gates, Buffett, Soros, Beyonce, lebron, Bezos, George Clooney, the Hollywood crowd, George Lucas, Oprah...its all bilionaires

 

[miketx]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

The real nazi's are the trump family and the loyalty oath Papa has every subordinate take to work near him. If you knew Adolf like I do you would not think, ha ha, anyone but cons are working on a peaceful coup of America.

Lying scum. Bye.

 

[Rigby5]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

That's all completely bass-ackwards.

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

nazi...national socialist workers party

That was the name of the political wing of the SA really, and when Hitler took over and wiped out the SA, they dropped the "workers party" and it became just National Socialist, which actually was totally and completely anti-socialist.
The Nazis used the SS instead of the SA, and murdered or imprisoned ALL the socialists.
The Nazis were picked by the wealthy elite, and were against the socialists.

 

[Rigby5]

Anyone who think Hitler or Mussolini were socialists, knows nothing of economics or politics.
Hitler and Mussolini were picked by the wealthy elite, to maximize capitalist profits.
Neither socialized anything, and were groomed as anti-socialists.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

That's all completely bass-ackwards.

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

dey tawt me dis een publik skol!

 

[Crepitus]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

That's all completely bass-ackwards.

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

nazi...national socialist workers party

Riiight. And I suppose you think the DPRK is Democratic, too?

 

[Crepitus]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

That's all completely bass-ackwards.

Just to start with everyone knows the Nazis were not socialist.

dey tawt me dis een publik skol!

I meen the akcual fax? You bet yer billy, Jethro.

 

[frigidweirdo]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

Well, most Democrats aren't Socialists.

The NSDAP were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS, rather than Socialists. There was a bit of Socialism in there, but not really.

The NSDAP was backed by the American super rich?

The people putting the most money into US politics are Republicans, the Koch brothers (or what's left of them).

What the Nazis did in terms of brown shirts isn't anything the Democrats are doing. Those who are violent aren't "Democrats".

And the rest is equally nonsense.

Basically all it shows us is that you're willing to make stuff up for some pointless "political fight" that looks like it belongs in elementary school.

I would say everyone is a socialist really.
If you believe in public schools, aid to the disabled, etc., then you ARE a socialist.
If you believe in regulations against slavery, child labor, monopolies, etc., then you ARE a socialist.

Most people just don't know what socialism is, and lots of people lie and claim it means central government ownership of all means of production.

Wellllllll.....

There's Socialism with a big "S" which is the control of the means of production by the government.

Then there's socialism, or socialized + whatever, which is just the government running some things that aren't the means of production.

 

[frigidweirdo]

1) They are BOTH SOCIALISTS

Is there a nobler or more excellent kind of Socialism and is there a truer form of Democracy than this National Socialism which is so organized that through it each one among the millions of German boys is given the possibility of finding his way to the highest office in the nation, should it please Providence to come to his aid.

A Hitler(January 30, 1937).

2) BOTH backed-up by the American Super-Rich

3) BOTH used STORM-TROOPERS to quash political opposition. The Germans has the BROWNSHIRTS, the Democrats have ANTIFA and BLM.

4) BOTH employ "social justice" as an argument for criminal theft.

Because it seems inseparable from the social idea and we do not believe that there could ever exist a state with lasting inner health if it is not built on internal SOCIAL JUSTICE, and so we have joined forces with this knowledge. Adolph Hitler

5) BOTH practice the politics of RACIAL IDENTITY.

Well, most Democrats aren't Socialists.

The NSDAP were NATIONAL SOCIALISTS, rather than Socialists. There was a bit of Socialism in there, but not really.

The NSDAP was backed by the American super rich?

The people putting the most money into US politics are Republicans, the Koch brothers (or what's left of them).

What the Nazis did in terms of brown shirts isn't anything the Democrats are doing. Those who are violent aren't "Democrats".

And the rest is equally nonsense.

Basically all it shows us is that you're willing to make stuff up for some pointless "political fight" that looks like it belongs in elementary school.

the super rich are all democrats....Gates, Buffett, Soros, Beyonce, lebron, Bezos, George Clooney, the Hollywood crowd, George Lucas, Oprah...its all bilionaires

Yeah, I'm sure the Koch brothers (or what's left of them) paid a lot of money for you to think this.

George Clooney, super rich? Er...

George Clooney Net Worth

What is George Clooney’s net worth? Introduction As of , George Clooney’s net worth is approximately , making him one of the most sought-after A list actors in Hollywood, and one of the richest actors in the world. George Clooney is an American actor, businessman, and filmmaker from Kentucky...

wealthygorilla.com

$500 million, not super rich.

As for they're all Democrats. They're not. If you think so, God help us all.