Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Giulianis problem is that he made more accusations than he had actual facts to support.The ones rejected, were rejected because they were merely speculation, with no evidence to support the accusations and speculations...I believe?They didn't submit hundreds of questionable affidavits, because if they're false, the lawyers can be charged with subornation of perjury for submitting them.
And the one's that are true, don't make more than speculation as to what happened.
If someone saw someone else jimmy open your car door and drive away is that "speculation"?They didn't submit hundreds of questionable affidavits, because if they're false, the lawyers can be charged with subornation of perjury for submitting them.
And the one's that are true, don't make more than speculation as to what happened.
You keep repeating this as if it's fact. Have you ever accounted for your claim? Not to my knowledge.You are 1-40 in court.
And you know that cases that are tossed with little justification in one court get appealed to a higher court--
right?
You are so full of shit you give my monitor screen a brown tinge.
Of course you don’t believe it.
Because cult
The count isn't actually 1-40, because that counts suits they withdrew as a loss. So it's more like 1-34, ,with half a dozen surrenders.
If someone saw someone else jimmy open your car door and drive away is that "speculation"?They didn't submit hundreds of questionable affidavits, because if they're false, the lawyers can be charged with subornation of perjury for submitting them.
And the one's that are true, don't make more than speculation as to what happened.
Or witnessing a crime in progress?
The spectacular efforts to discount and rationalize these crimes is stunning.
Your incredulous powers of denial are amazing....and mostly dishonest.
This has been a tactic that has failed because early on the Trump team decided not to try and pursue a case of fraud (which is the reason why Powell has dissociated herself) because they thought it would be easier toGiulianis problem is that he made more accusations than he had actual facts to support.
Outside the court Rudy declared "fraud, fraud, fraud". But once in front of the judge he admitted "This is not a fraud case".
Please. You are bothering the adults here. Try the child's table.There are no crimes.
People making those claims are lying to you.
Judges who are not politicians in black robes KNOW OR SHOULD KNOW THAT
VERIFIED COMPLAINTS CAN NOT BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED UNTIL THE PARTY OPPONENT PRESENTS EVIDENCE REFUTING THE SAME.
And the one's that are true, don't make more than speculation as to what happened.
That would be an affidavit enough to support whatever action they're requesting.If someone saw someone else jimmy open your car door and drive away is that "speculation"?
Or witnessing a crime in progress?
And that's valid too. But I think pure fraud is the better case of the two.
Hundreds of affidavits have been filed and are still pouring in. One, for example, was from a poll worker in Detroit who has harassed and verbally threatened with violence when she refused to ignore electionThat would be an affidavit enough to support whatever action they're requesting.
But that's not what Trumps legal teams have produced. Their affidavits are to the tune of, I saw somebody fiddle with the car door for ten minutes, get inside, and drive away.
Similar to when a neighbor reported two black men fooling with the front door of Henry Lewis Gates house.
rumble.com
How about sending all poll workers home because a burst water main was reported, when in fact,Proving fraud is like proving somebody cheated at cards. You have to catch them with an ace up their sleeve, or a marked deck, or marking the cards.
You can't just say because they won a lot of hands, that it goes beyond statistical probability, therefore they had to have cheated.
You could say that of every powerball lottery winner, who beat 100 million to 1 odds.
is it fraud when there are more votes than registered voters? Is it fraud when dead people vote? is it fraud when the voting machines flip votes from one candidate to the other? Is if fraud when the vote counters cannot be watched? Is it fraud when a guy who couldn't get 50 people to a rally beats a guy who got tens to thousands to dozens or rallies? Is it fraud when 130,000 votes mysteriously show up at 4am and they are all for Biden?
Yes, there was massive fraud and its being revealed in the courts. This is far from over.
You are 1-40 in court.
Because what you claim is bullshit.
You are being fed lies by your media and political leaders. They are stringing you along.
Patriots, let me remind you that the Demo Rats and anti Trumpers get to nominate activist corrupt "judges"
Those politicians in black robes thus far have ignored all judicial maxims in order to rule against the President.
.
Even the Trump appointed judges are quickly dismissing these frivolous cases. You should know this already.
In fresh blow to Trump, U.S. court rejects Pennsylvania election case
A federal appeals court on Friday rejected an attempt by U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign to block President-elect Joe Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania, dealing another significant setback to Trump's bid to overturn the Nov. 3 election.www.reuters.com
Judges who are not politicians in black robes KNOW OR SHOULD KNOW THAT
VERIFIED COMPLAINTS CAN NOT BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED UNTIL THE PARTY OPPONENT PRESENTS EVIDENCE REFUTING THE SAME.
Remember, most of these cases are asking for injunctive relief, not a trial.
There is no time for discovery, empaneling a jury, and holding a trial. These are motions in front of a judge who has to decide if there is sufficient evidence for him to order extraordinary action.
And with the plaintiffs wanting to disenfranchise millions or tens of millions of voters, the level of proof has to be more than just speculation.
I believe one judge said it would take a lot of evidence to throw out a single vote, no less the votes of the 6th largest state.
is it fraud when there are more votes than registered voters? Is it fraud when dead people vote? is it fraud when the voting machines flip votes from one candidate to the other? Is if fraud when the vote counters cannot be watched? Is it fraud when a guy who couldn't get 50 people to a rally beats a guy who got tens to thousands to dozens or rallies? Is it fraud when 130,000 votes mysteriously show up at 4am and they are all for Biden?
Yes, there was massive fraud and its being revealed in the courts. This is far from over.
You are 1-40 in court.
Because what you claim is bullshit.
You are being fed lies by your media and political leaders. They are stringing you along.
Patriots, let me remind you that the Demo Rats and anti Trumpers get to nominate activist corrupt "judges"
Those politicians in black robes thus far have ignored all judicial maxims in order to rule against the President.
.
Even the Trump appointed judges are quickly dismissing these frivolous cases. You should know this already.
In fresh blow to Trump, U.S. court rejects Pennsylvania election case
A federal appeals court on Friday rejected an attempt by U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign to block President-elect Joe Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania, dealing another significant setback to Trump's bid to overturn the Nov. 3 election.
SHUT THE FUCK UP
WHERE DID THE JUDGE RULES THAT THE CASE WAS FRIVOLOUS?!?!?!?
HE DID SAY THAT HE WAS SCARED TO GO AGAINST THE DEEP STATE AND THE FAKE NEW MEDIA
He did not and could not explain the reason that :
the counties that were predominately Democratic — were allowed to cure their ballots, while voters in primarily Republican counties were not given the same chance.
"If you were in the seven blue counties in Pennsylvania, you were given an extraordinary opportunity to fix your mail-in ballot, to cure your ballot. But if you were in the other 60 mainly Republican counties, you didn’t get that privilege. That’s an equal protection violation,"
"WE THE PEOPLE have a right to ask these questions, and they presented affidavits. And there are declarations made as well, so there is evidence there,
But the scumbag believes that is more important to grandstand for the media and deep state than it it is to be an adjudicator.
.
is it fraud when there are more votes than registered voters? Is it fraud when dead people vote? is it fraud when the voting machines flip votes from one candidate to the other? Is if fraud when the vote counters cannot be watched? Is it fraud when a guy who couldn't get 50 people to a rally beats a guy who got tens to thousands to dozens or rallies? Is it fraud when 130,000 votes mysteriously show up at 4am and they are all for Biden?
Yes, there was massive fraud and its being revealed in the courts. This is far from over.
You are 1-40 in court.
Because what you claim is bullshit.
You are being fed lies by your media and political leaders. They are stringing you along.
Patriots, let me remind you that the Demo Rats and anti Trumpers get to nominate activist corrupt "judges"
Those politicians in black robes thus far have ignored all judicial maxims in order to rule against the President.
.
Even the Trump appointed judges are quickly dismissing these frivolous cases. You should know this already.
In fresh blow to Trump, U.S. court rejects Pennsylvania election case
A federal appeals court on Friday rejected an attempt by U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign to block President-elect Joe Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania, dealing another significant setback to Trump's bid to overturn the Nov. 3 election.
SHUT THE FUCK UP
WHERE DID THE JUDGE RULES THAT THE CASE WAS FRIVOLOUS?!?!?!?
HE DID SAY THAT HE WAS SCARED TO GO AGAINST THE DEEP STATE AND THE FAKE NEW MEDIA
He did not and could not explain the reason that :
the counties that were predominately Democratic — were allowed to cure their ballots, while voters in primarily Republican counties were not given the same chance.
"If you were in the seven blue counties in Pennsylvania, you were given an extraordinary opportunity to fix your mail-in ballot, to cure your ballot. But if you were in the other 60 mainly Republican counties, you didn’t get that privilege. That’s an equal protection violation,"
"WE THE PEOPLE have a right to ask these questions, and they presented affidavits. And there are declarations made as well, so there is evidence there,
But the scumbag believes that is more important to grandstand for the media and deep state than it it is to be an adjudicator.
.
So tiring. The Trump judge said “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” That is him calling it a frivolous lawsuit and no, he wasn't scared.
Link to all this and judges ruling?Giulianis problem is that he made more accusations than he had actual facts to support.The ones rejected, were rejected because they were merely speculation, with no evidence to support the accusations and speculations...I believe?They didn't submit hundreds of questionable affidavits, because if they're false, the lawyers can be charged with subornation of perjury for submitting them.
And the one's that are true, don't make more than speculation as to what happened.
Outside the court Rudy declared "fraud, fraud, fraud". But once in front of the judge he admitted "This is not a fraud case".
By the way, so you know an affidavit claiming to have witnessed the theft of an automobile would be acceptable proof in a court of law. A stranger breaking into an auto you know is not his, because you know who owns the car, is enough to convict someone of car theft.That would be an affidavit enough to support whatever action they're requesting.
But that's not what Trumps legal teams have produced. Their affidavits are to the tune of, I saw somebody fiddle with the car door for ten minutes, get inside, and drive away.
Similar to when a neighbor reported two black men fooling with the front door of Henry Lewis Gates house.
Voting is time consuming and inconvenient. The probability that one vote will be the deciding vote in a presidential election is much much smaller than the chance of being hit by a car on the way to the polls. If we look at it in these terms alone, voting appears to be irrational. However, if we look at from the standpoint that voting is doing our part to keep or make, America great, depending on your point of view then it does make sense.How about the fact that millions of people know their vote is pointless?It would be illegal for the state to refuse to certify an election which has been certified by each county. Once the state certifies the election, lawsuits aren't going change anything. The only thing these lawsuits and Trump's claims of a rigged election do is in undermine confidence in the American democratic processes. There's no need for the Russians to discredit American democracy, Trump is doing the job for them.Unless, you nullify the whole damn election do to fraud-----Even if you can prove fraud, the likelihood of changing the outcome of an election is very small. Once a vote is cast, it is almost impossible to determine how that voter voted due to state laws and state constitutions requiring ballot secrecy. In every major election, there are always a few thousand cases of voter fraud discovered spread across the 50 states. The perpetrators may be punished but the counts are not changed.The purpose of this lawsuit as well as the previous 30 or so has been to create the illusion in Trump's mind and his followers that he did not lose the election and to delay the process as long as possible.From an article about Trump's relentless frivolous lawsuits trying to overturn the election..'But that’s the point. Trump’s strategy, his allies concede in private, wasn’t to change the outcome, but to create a host of phantom claims about the 2020 presidential race that would infect the nation with doubt and keep his base loyal, even though the winner was clear and there has been no evidence of mass voter fraud.'...They're baaack: Trump and allies still refuse election loss
Unless the court can determine exactly which votes were illegal, there will be no change in the total count. The one thing the court will not do is nullify any voter's ballot unless it is prove to be invalid. Accusations, suppositions about what could have happened or lack of oversight will not change a single vote.
The election results are fraudulent.
Fraud takes a while to prove but is doable and must be done.
You and the Fake News Media aka The SEE BS Network want to create the illusion that Biden's victory is legitimate by the FAKE POLLS and constant denials.
It doesn't matter - we must keep on trucking
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.
Barry Goldwater (R-Az)
And btw, the ones cheating which is always the fricking dems---should automatically lose and be put in prison for fraud.
Voting is time consuming and inconvenient. The probability that one vote will be the deciding vote in a presidential election is much much smaller than the chance of being hit by a car on the way to the polls. If we look at it in these terms alone, voting appears to be irrational. However, if we look at from the standpoint that voting is doing our part to keep or make, America great, depending on your point of view then it does make sense.How about the fact that millions of people know their vote is pointless?It would be illegal for the state to refuse to certify an election which has been certified by each county. Once the state certifies the election, lawsuits aren't going change anything. The only thing these lawsuits and Trump's claims of a rigged election do is in undermine confidence in the American democratic processes. There's no need for the Russians to discredit American democracy, Trump is doing the job for them.Unless, you nullify the whole damn election do to fraud-----Even if you can prove fraud, the likelihood of changing the outcome of an election is very small. Once a vote is cast, it is almost impossible to determine how that voter voted due to state laws and state constitutions requiring ballot secrecy. In every major election, there are always a few thousand cases of voter fraud discovered spread across the 50 states. The perpetrators may be punished but the counts are not changed.The purpose of this lawsuit as well as the previous 30 or so has been to create the illusion in Trump's mind and his followers that he did not lose the election and to delay the process as long as possible.From an article about Trump's relentless frivolous lawsuits trying to overturn the election..'But that’s the point. Trump’s strategy, his allies concede in private, wasn’t to change the outcome, but to create a host of phantom claims about the 2020 presidential race that would infect the nation with doubt and keep his base loyal, even though the winner was clear and there has been no evidence of mass voter fraud.'...They're baaack: Trump and allies still refuse election loss
Unless the court can determine exactly which votes were illegal, there will be no change in the total count. The one thing the court will not do is nullify any voter's ballot unless it is prove to be invalid. Accusations, suppositions about what could have happened or lack of oversight will not change a single vote.
The election results are fraudulent.
Fraud takes a while to prove but is doable and must be done.
You and the Fake News Media aka The SEE BS Network want to create the illusion that Biden's victory is legitimate by the FAKE POLLS and constant denials.
It doesn't matter - we must keep on trucking
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.
Barry Goldwater (R-Az)
And btw, the ones cheating which is always the fricking dems---should automatically lose and be put in prison for fraud.
"Along we can do so little; together we can do so much."
Helen Keller
