Not at all. Right wingers keep proving they don't care about the Poor people. Businesses pass on costs to their consumers all the time. Right wingers make it seem like y'all only have a problem when even the Poor may benefit under our form of Capitalism.
While it may be true that republicans may donate more to charity, social services in red States tend to be less and right wingers also tend to enact policies which have the effect of criminalizing poverty. With right wingers, it may seem that they giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other.Republicans have done the most for the poor. If you look at charitable donations, Republicans and specifically Religious Conservatives which are overwhelmingly Republican, we donate more money, and more of our personal time, to helping others than left-wingers or Democrats.
Whatever You May Think of Republicans, Don't Call Them 'Stingy' | RealClearMarkets
Republicans are greedy. Theyre out for themselves as evidenced by their reflexive support of tax cuts for the rich. According to New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, the GOP is the...www.realclearmarkets.com
This is universally documented. Dozens of research papers all point to the fact that Republicans in generally are vastly more charitable than left-wingers and Democrats.
By a wide margine too.
Further, Republicans have better results than Democrats.
Republicans use private charities, which help people actually get out of poverty. Not stay in it like Democrats.
For example, we have a charity here in the city, that helps ex-covicts. Free room and board. They can stay there for up to 4 years. They get job training, and job placement.
I worked at the shelter down town, which provided job training programs, and placement into apprenticeships, and we paid for moving expenses to help, typically women with children, to get into an apartment of their own.
None of the government programs do any of that. Instead people stay on welfare, and never move out of their poverty condition.
So unlike Democrats, we actually help people.
And by the way, Democrats never even attempt to help people. They say "we're helping people" but the reality is, no Democrat votes to support taxing themselves. They want to tax OTHER PEOPLE, to pay for the programs they claim will help.
Name one time that a Democrat on stage in from of hundreds of thousands of middle class people, told everyone "We're going to tax the middle class, to help the poor!". Never. They only claim they will tax OTHER people.
And if you vote Democrat with the expectation that you are not going to be the one taxed.... then you don't care about the poor at all. You only want other people to care for the poor, which makes you a stingy greedy miserly person.
Right wingers appeal to ignorance and ignorant platitudes. Dogs don't have backpacks to carry food to their pack. Right wingers only know how to "hate on the Poor" while enacting public policies that have the effect of creating hellish conditions on Earth through their useless and endless and alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror; which y'all also don't want to pay for with tax cut economics instead of with war time tax rates.
Nothing but hypocrisy from the right wing. The South fought a war to keep slavery and enacted black codes that prove you wrong.
For the same reason some employers were helping their minimum wage labor to apply for government assistance to pass those costs on to the public sector instead of the consumers merely for their bottom line.
Admit it, y'all prefer to hate on the Poor. Why not pass that cost on to your consumer like you do for every other cost that has no immediate benefit to the Poor?
Abolish your useless and alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror to reduce those Big Government nanny-State regulatory costs which do nothing to help the Poor. Criminalizing poverty is not very charitable.
Why not pass legislation that actually helps the poor and those with few job skills? Why punish them with legislation that makes it harder for them to find or keep work?
Yes it is. Criminalizing is simply making something illegal. Not declaring a war. Being the all powerful deciders here, declaring that poverty(*) is something we shall no longer tolerate is extremely charitable. Meaning and enforcing it only moreso. Excessively poor no longer being a thing we'll allow. Too poor to be considered one of us. Which necessitates either removing those found so lacking or providing them any shortfall. Clearly not just passing the buck by demanding they fix the problem for us.
In order for your theory to make sense...there would have to be a finite amount of wealth in existence. If that were the case then one person having a vast amount of wealth would have obviously prevented another person from having their fair share. Where your theory falls on it's face however is that there ISN'T a finite amount of wealth! It isn't that rich people have stolen wealth from poor people...it's that poor people haven't figured out how to gain wealth or worse have been promised a subsistence amount of wealth by politicians in return for their votes. All you're doing by criminalizing "excess" wealth is coming up with an excuse to steal wealth from one group to buy off another!
We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday but for right wing, hate on the Poor.
Propaganda and rhetoric is no substitute for substantive action. Our alleged and endless war on poverty only institutionalized poverty and hardened right wingers attitudes against the Poor. There is a simple solution to poverty but right wingers seem to have the most problem with it, probably because they prefer to "hate on the Poor" to make it easier to exploit them.
In the US, those with the most "gold" tend to make the most rules. It is more difficult for the Poor to be able to afford justice under Capitalism. Slavery or black codes was not about right wingers being more charitable than the left.
Truly irony knows no bounds.
Once again. Why don't the worthless POOR help themselves? Welfare has become a way of life for some groups.
If you have worked twelve years for minimum wage...you have failed in life.
RW doesn't do "facts". He prefers to flame, troll, and shitpost.
