SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics

SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..
-That doesn't Invest in tech outside of the private sector doing it for their own benefit.
-Doesn't have an Educational system that allows for a large percentage of the population to be educated. Yes, you either have a shit load of money to send your children to private or you don't get it..
-No regulations on the business sector and monopolies' are welcome.
-Doesn't allow science institutions for the benefit of the nation. Want warning? Pay a private corp for it or you're out of luck.
-Allows a monopoly to pave the roads and charge as much as it damn well wishes.
-That allows slave labor or child labor. You see there's no federal laws and businesses shouldn't be regulated, you say.:eusa_silenced:
-Environmental laws that demand that we don't **** up the air or water. India or china you could say, but I wouldn't say they're first world in that area.:eek:

Show me one with a federal government that sit there with its finger up its ass looking at a wall. One with at least $20,000/year per capita for the common man would be a good clue on what I am talking about. :badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:

Show me one communist nation in the world.
SHow me one socialist nation in the world.
All of them are amalgams of different systems. Your post proves you are a loser and not much else.

When you have no idea what is being discussed, why do you insist on repeatedly proving it to everyone?
 
Singapore is one of the world's richest nations and is economically largely, though not completely, libertarian. Economic freedom is its cornerstone.

Economy of Singapore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lol did you even read the article? Because I did. There is nothing libertarian about Singapore. The government has a huge stake in the economy and it has socialized healthcare system. Not only that, but it invests a great deal in education.

It's am impressive economy no doubt, but it is not at all libertarian.
What is difficult about low taxes and economic freedom you don't understand?
 
Singapore is one of the world's richest nations and is economically largely, though not completely, libertarian. Economic freedom is its cornerstone.

Economy of Singapore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lol did you even read the article? Because I did. There is nothing libertarian about Singapore. The government has a huge stake in the economy and it has socialized healthcare system. Not only that, but it invests a great deal in education.

It's am impressive economy no doubt, but it is not at all libertarian.
What is difficult about low taxes and economic freedom you don't understand?

See, I predicted a moving of goalposts once someone identified a candidate. I wasnt wrong.
 
Why is it that the more the government "invests" in education, the further behind we fall?
 
Somalia seems to provide an interesting case. There is virtually no government, yet the economy is growing. Sure its a shit hole but almost every country in Africa is, and most of them arent growing like Somalia is.
 
Singapore is one of the world's richest nations and is economically largely, though not completely, libertarian. Economic freedom is its cornerstone.

Economy of Singapore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lol did you even read the article? Because I did. There is nothing libertarian about Singapore. The government has a huge stake in the economy and it has socialized healthcare system. Not only that, but it invests a great deal in education.

It's am impressive economy no doubt, but it is not at all libertarian.
What is difficult about low taxes and economic freedom you don't understand?

I understand both of those concepts quite clearly. I'm not sure you understand what libertarianism is though.
 
Somalia seems to provide an interesting case. There is virtually no government, yet the economy is growing. Sure its a shit hole but almost every country in Africa is, and most of them arent growing like Somalia is.

Do you even know what a first world country is?
 
o rabbi, were forth art thou? What was so wrong with the jews being under pharoah's every order or rule? they weren't slaves they were just dumb manual labor and got what the pyramid scheme and or pharoahs gave them. They were happy to get it till moses got kicked out of the rich boy club and then he started to care about his fellow jews? your God had to step in and stop this injustice for his people because they weren't man enough to earn more or stick up for themselves who always greatly out numbered their not so gentile captors. splain to me like I'm a socialist jew marching through a desert for 40years living off God's holy hand outs. No you treat the palestinians worse then your "race" ever was in it's so called holy land.
 
Lol did you even read the article? Because I did. There is nothing libertarian about Singapore. The government has a huge stake in the economy and it has socialized healthcare system. Not only that, but it invests a great deal in education.

It's am impressive economy no doubt, but it is not at all libertarian.
What is difficult about low taxes and economic freedom you don't understand?

I understand both of those concepts quite clearly. I'm not sure you understand what libertarianism is though.
I think you may need to read this and compare an contrast it with the Singaporean economy. I am certainly not saying it is pure libertarian, nor am I suggesting it would work as well elsewhere. There are few places with such a highly-skilled workforce due to demographics. Investing in education there is not like pouring money down the black hole of American public schools.

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/key-concepts-libertarianism
 
Somalia seems to provide an interesting case. There is virtually no government, yet the economy is growing. Sure its a shit hole but almost every country in Africa is, and most of them arent growing like Somalia is.

Do you even know what a first world country is?

Question is, do you?

I think it's pretty clear that you do not Rabbi.

You seem to struggle with the most basic of concepts.

And you lie.
 
SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..

The United States of 'Merka. Circa 1791.

:D
 
What is difficult about low taxes and economic freedom you don't understand?

I understand both of those concepts quite clearly. I'm not sure you understand what libertarianism is though.
I think you may need to read this and compare an contrast it with the Singaporean economy. I am certainly not saying it is pure libertarian, nor am I suggesting it would work as well elsewhere. There are few places with such a highly-skilled workforce due to demographics. Investing in education there is not like pouring money down the black hole of American public schools.

Key Concepts of Libertarianism | Cato Institute

On top of the facts I said about Singapore, there is nothing libertarian about it. Yes it is capitalism, but it is not "free market". The government has a huge stake in the economy. That's why they are able to have such a low tax rate. It's actually quite brilliant. America should adopt that system.
 
I understand both of those concepts quite clearly. I'm not sure you understand what libertarianism is though.
I think you may need to read this and compare an contrast it with the Singaporean economy. I am certainly not saying it is pure libertarian, nor am I suggesting it would work as well elsewhere. There are few places with such a highly-skilled workforce due to demographics. Investing in education there is not like pouring money down the black hole of American public schools.

Key Concepts of Libertarianism | Cato Institute

On top of the facts I said about Singapore, there is nothing libertarian about it. Yes it is capitalism, but it is not "free market". The government has a huge stake in the economy. That's why they are able to have such a low tax rate. It's actually quite brilliant. America should adopt that system.
Oh, ffs. One more link and then stay ignorant forever for all I care:

Economic Freedom by Country ? 2013 Ranking | Global Finance Magazine
 
SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..

The United States of 'Merka. Circa 1791.

:D

Bs, the constitution, we use now was to move away from "libertarian economics" of the pre-constitutional period before 1791. Understand that this constitution grants the federal government the power to tax and supply services to the people of this country. Most importantly allows them to regulate.
 
15th post
I think you may need to read this and compare an contrast it with the Singaporean economy. I am certainly not saying it is pure libertarian, nor am I suggesting it would work as well elsewhere. There are few places with such a highly-skilled workforce due to demographics. Investing in education there is not like pouring money down the black hole of American public schools.

Key Concepts of Libertarianism | Cato Institute

On top of the facts I said about Singapore, there is nothing libertarian about it. Yes it is capitalism, but it is not "free market". The government has a huge stake in the economy. That's why they are able to have such a low tax rate. It's actually quite brilliant. America should adopt that system.
Oh, ffs. One more link and then stay ignorant forever for all I care:

Economic Freedom by Country ? 2013 Ranking | Global Finance Magazine

You are welcome to dispute the information I have provided with relevant sources.
 
SHOW me one developed first world nation that uses libertarian economics of super limited government without investment within its own borders. Maybe once you do, we can talk about if it is a good idea or not.

Show me....ONE..

The United States of 'Merka. Circa 1791.

:D

Probably as close as any nation has ever come (IMHO) I guess.

And if we had liked it - we could have kept it that way I guess.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom