Shouldn't there be a "disagree" option?

[Lipush]

I wonder why is there no option to also "disagree" with certain poster (no flaming intended) but just tag a post with "agree"?

Seems logical.

 

[JoeB131]

there was, and a whole lot of people abused it.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

I wonder why is there no option to also "disagree" with certain poster (no flaming intended) but just tag a post with "agree"?

Seems logical.

We Jews are a logical bunch. Said this myself

 

[Politico]

there was, and a whole lot of people abused it.

That.

 

[Sonny Clark]

I wonder why is there no option to also "disagree" with certain poster (no flaming intended) but just tag a post with "agree"?

Seems logical.

It'd much better to do that with an explanation. A "disagree" option would be for those too lazy to make a comment. If one disagrees, simply say so in a comment, as we're doing now. We disagree with each other already, but we do it in our comments. Simply clicking on a disagree tab without an explanation as to why, would serve absolutely no purpose other than provide a lazy person with a way to slam a post or comment, then run hide somewhere. If you're going to disagree, then be courteous enough to explain why you disagree. No need to slam posts and comment, then move on without saying why you disagree. Problem? Just curious, why would you even want a disagree tab? The purpose would be?

 

[AVG-JOE]

As was pointed out above, abuse of the 'disagree' tag led to discontinuation of its use.

If you want to disagree with a post, reply to it and give details.