Zone1 Should you have to pay taxes to be able to vote?

[JoeB131]

That dog don't hunt, he will get more than last time, what accomplishment does Harris have to run on, or even policy?

He won't get more than last time. I've talked to a lot people who voted for him in 2020, who tell me they are sick of him and his nonsense.

 

[Frankenstein]

He won't get more than last time. I've talked to a lot people who voted for him in 2020, who tell me they are sick of him and his nonsense.

Sure you have!

 

[Rambunctious]

There are probably less Trump voters than there were last time.

 

[Rambunctious]

He won't get more than last time. I've talked to a lot people who voted for him in 2020, who tell me they are sick of him and his nonsense.

 

[Rambunctious]

I've talked to a lot people who voted for him in 2020, who tell me they are sick of him and his nonsense.

Sure.... good story bro...

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Democrats would simply add $1 to every welfare payment and then apply a $1 tax deduction on every welfare check they send out to their socialist sloth voters and that would be that.

 

[playtime]

of course not.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Why is it a bad idea

People used it. Ever hear of Jim Crow laws?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Why do people want to suppress the vote?

They're not talkin bout building the wall crusty.

 

[Dante]

It’s not a bad idea to flirt with IMO

It’s easy to spend other people’s money, and it’s easy to vote to only get things from the state and not give anything.

It’s easy to vote recklessly if one has no skin in the game.

It’s like 2 parents and 3 kids in a family, and all get a vote. The kids vote for toys, food, vacations, etc while the parents vote for paying the mortgage and saving for retirement. Under this system the family will become homeless and broke.

Why do you people want to suppress the vote?

 

[Slyhunter]

Why do you people want to suppress the vote?

Why didn't you reply to what he said instead of coming up with some left wing talking point?

 

[justoffal]

It’s not a bad idea to flirt with IMO

It’s easy to spend other people’s money, and it’s easy to vote to only get things from the state and not give anything.

It’s easy to vote recklessly if one has no skin in the game.

It’s like 2 parents and 3 kids in a family, and all get a vote. The kids vote for toys, food, vacations, etc while the parents vote for paying the mortgage and saving for retirement. Under this system the family will become homeless and broke.

YES!

Eliminate payroll taxation, convert to consumption tax.

Triple the revenue...eliminate the term illegal alien. Pretty simple.

 

[justoffal]

Why do you people want to suppress the vote?

A non tax payer's vote is not a vote...it's a mosquito bite. You don't contribute? You have nothing to say.

 

[Dante]

Why didn't you reply to what he said instead of coming up with some left wing talking point?

Why can't you people address your wanting to suppress the vote?

man up

 

[justoffal]

Why can't you people address your wanting to suppress the vote?

man up

What vote is that?

 

[Mr. Friscus]

People used it. Ever hear of Jim Crow laws?

Yes, those were Democrat laws. What about them?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Yes, those were Democrat laws. What about them?

They used it to keep blacks from voting for Republicans.

 

[Picaro]

The RNC is launching a massive effort to monitor voting. Critics say it threatens to undermine trust

The Republican National Committee is launching a battleground state initiative to mobilize thousands of polling place monitors, poll workers and attorneys to serve as “election integrity” watchdogs in November.

apnews.com

The GOP was essentially worthless in elections; maybe they actually plan to do tier jobs as a Party this time, but I doubt it. they did exactly nothing in the Biden/Trump banana republic farce.

 

[Coyote]

It’s not a bad idea to flirt with IMO

It’s easy to spend other people’s money, and it’s easy to vote to only get things from the state and not give anything.

It’s easy to vote recklessly if one has no skin in the game.

It’s like 2 parents and 3 kids in a family, and all get a vote. The kids vote for toys, food, vacations, etc while the parents vote for paying the mortgage and saving for retirement. Under this system the family will become homeless and broke.

Everyone who lives in this country as a citizen and is subject to it’s laws has “skin in the game”. Elitists keep trying to come up with new ways to limit the franchise.

 

[Robert W]

Yep. Being in a mostly agrarian society it made sense at the time.

So why did it change and when did it change?