Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you referring to the CURRENT way it's setup where it's the insurance company's job to make profit, therefore to NOT pay out on as many claims as they can get away with?First, I'd like to ascertain that you understand the nature of insurance.
Are you referring to the CURRENT way it's setup where it's the insurance company's job to make profit, therefore to NOT pay out on as many claims as they can get away with?First, I'd like to ascertain that you understand the nature of insurance.
Is that what you're trying to ascertain?
How about the current setup, where various state gubmints force insurance companies to cover this or that, and customers who demand low rates while expecting insurance to pay for every contact with themselves and someone wearing scrubs?Are you referring to the CURRENT way it's setup where it's the insurance company's job to make profit, therefore to NOT pay out on as many claims as they can get away with?First, I'd like to ascertain that you understand the nature of insurance.
Is that what you're trying to ascertain?
Hey buttmunch...what's the job of the insurance company, as your brain understands it?How about the current setup, where various state gubmints force insurance companies to cover this or that, and customers who demand low rates while expecting insurance to pay for every contact with themselves and someone wearing scrubs?
Hey, dickweed, I can remember when medical insurance was called "hospitalization", denoting its true function: to be prepared for unexpected/unforeseeable medical or trauma expenses...At no time was insurance meant to pay for mundane things like check-ups or recurring expenses like birth control....Nor was it expected that you could go running to the doc with a case of the sniffles, so that you could get a "free" bottle of cough syrup.Hey buttmunch...what's the job of the insurance company, as your brain understands it?How about the current setup, where various state gubmints force insurance companies to cover this or that, and customers who demand low rates while expecting insurance to pay for every contact with themselves and someone wearing scrubs?
Uhm...that was that way before Obamacare.Hey, dickweed, I can remember when medical insurance was called "hospitalization", denoting its true function: to be prepared for unexpected/unforeseeable medical or trauma expenses...At no time was insurance meant to pay for mundane things like check-ups or recurring expenses like birth control....Nor was it expected that you could go running to the doc with a case of the sniffles, so that you could get a "free" bottle of cough syrup.
If you ignore the user end and simply put all the blame on the providers, you're only telling half the story...But you're a libeoidal, so only getting half (or less) of the story is a given right off the bat.
Well, that's what insurance are, a way for shareholders to make money, at the expense of all those signed up through their company.Nope. My question is quite clear.
What's the way you understand it to be?
Or, should Health Insurance companies be looking out for the welfare of you?
Why/why not?
And who benefits the most in this situation?It is a risk-transfer mechanism in which one party (insured) pays a premium to another party (insurer) to assume the risk in the event of a loss.
And who benefits the most in this situation?It is a risk-transfer mechanism in which one party (insured) pays a premium to another party (insurer) to assume the risk in the event of a loss.
And who benefits the most in this situation?It is a risk-transfer mechanism in which one party (insured) pays a premium to another party (insurer) to assume the risk in the event of a loss.