It is Japanese, but the point is moot; the Constitution doesn't give the military (or Congress) the authority to act on behalf of foreign OR domestic companies. Really doesn't matter where it's based.
Say huh? Providing for the common defense of the American people is one of the most basic principles if not the most basic principle of the document. What you said is like saying a cook book has no recipes. Explain what is more basic than protecting the people of the United States in the Constitution? You have mental issues.
Let's run that back in slo-mo. See if you catch it.
Providing for the common defense of the American people is one of the most basic principles if not the most basic principle of the document
Indeed.
Oh I left a little clue in there. See if you can spot it.
Sony is not a "who". It's a "what".
Mental issues... SMH
Ah, this is your Marxism again. Businesses aren't people, got it.
Correct. Businesses aren't people. Just as schools, churches, sports teams, military divisions, unions, girl scout troops, country clubs, convents and other like collective nouns are not people. They're
made out of people, like a car is made out of bolts, but that doesn't make a bolt something you can jump into and drive to Milwaukee, does it? Think about it.
That's got nothing to do with "Marxism" or even with politics. That has to do with simple grammar.
When people decide to transact business, we no longer have rights as human beings because we are enemies of the State to be monitored and tightly controlled. Got it, Karl. Thanks for that insight, I get it now. You're right, when I opened the doors of my business, I waived my Constitutional rights.
I don't know what you're even talking about at this point. Perhaps you have mental issues.
So Vladimir, what if the North Koreans bombed your house but didn't kill anyone? They only attacked your property, so the government can't defend you, right? What if they kill your dog and cut the tires on your car. Nope, still no people, they are clear.
This red herring is even further off the rails. It's looking like that theory is correct, to wit: