Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
With the average marriage only lasting 12 years, then one partner usually getting stuck with raising the kids alone...and the misery then starting.........why would any woman get married and have children these days?
. Body 'ruined'.
. Childbirth pain...also women are still dying in childbirth.
. 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriage.
. Spend their lives trying to discipline children/teenagers...verbally abused by the kids for most of their teens.Then, when they get to old age, spoken to like dirt by their kids and tossed into 'shady pines' and never visited, or lived with by their kids and their grandkids...all of them treating the old folks like 'slaves'.
Choosing to not have children is essentially genetic suicide.
Would someone kindly please explain how suicide is "smart"?
Choosing to not have children is essentially genetic suicide.
Would someone kindly please explain how suicide is "smart"?
I look in all directions and find no sign of human extinction. We're good, no worries.
p.s. Why not blame the stupid ones for making too many?
Should we care that smart women aren't having kids? | Sadhbh Walshe | Comment is free | theguardian.com
I just thought this was interesting and strange, especially in light of upper education's appreciation of feminism and how feminism has gone along with untraditional family structures as well as tolerance of abortion.
There's a couple things about feminism to be considered from this:
- Will feminism decay over time because smart women aren't having kids?
- Has this trend always existed, and does it explain how feminism changed from it's first to second and third waves since smart women themselves didn't have kids, but others' kids had to interpret feminism for themselves?
Should we care that smart women aren't having kids? | Sadhbh Walshe | Comment is free | theguardian.com
I just thought this was interesting and strange, especially in light of upper education's appreciation of feminism and how feminism has gone along with untraditional family structures as well as tolerance of abortion.
There's a couple things about feminism to be considered from this:
- Will feminism decay over time because smart women aren't having kids?
- Has this trend always existed, and does it explain how feminism changed from it's first to second and third waves since smart women themselves didn't have kids, but others' kids had to interpret feminism for themselves?
Feminism and Pro-Choice are just political movements funded by the CIA and are nothing more than Globalist methods of keeping women from reproducing and having feminism destroy the family unit.
Notice how many single mothers there are and how 80% of their kids end up in prison... Thank You Globalism.
Notice that 3 our of 5 American women are on antidepressants and in the workplace. This too is a result of Globalism. Women are better designed to be mothers and secretaries. Other jobs are just too stressful for them. I am not opposed to women holding down jobs, but they need to be able to handle the work without needing medication for it.
If a woman wants to be a professional then she should get some help from her relatives as far as raising kids go. Aunts and Uncles helping out as well as Grandmas and Grandpas.... No they gotta scream for daycare.
Why all this cuz the family unit in America has broken down thanks to feminism and globalism.
Most of the medical professionals I know have children.
Stan has no kids, he is a surgical professor at Harvard med school.
He has no wife either.
A very arrogant mysogenist who has many short term relationships.
Great laugh on a night out.
Not as entertaining as some other Harvard professors one meets around Boston!
Should we care that smart women aren't having kids? | Sadhbh Walshe | Comment is free | theguardian.com
I just thought this was interesting and strange, especially in light of upper education's appreciation of feminism and how feminism has gone along with untraditional family structures as well as tolerance of abortion.
There's a couple things about feminism to be considered from this:
- Will feminism decay over time because smart women aren't having kids?
- Has this trend always existed, and does it explain how feminism changed from it's first to second and third waves since smart women themselves didn't have kids, but others' kids had to interpret feminism for themselves?
Choosing to not have children is essentially genetic suicide.
Would someone kindly please explain how suicide is "smart"?
Could it be that perhaps "feminists" recognize that they have a genetic inferiority that should not be passed on? Maybe they are justified in simply fading from existence?
Now these "feminists" may have been propped up as "smart" by their bankster masters... They are absolutely not "smart" in real LIFE terms, which is a quantifiable fact.
Again, maybe it is best such weak minded women do not reproduce. Those women who stand stalwart against such anti-family propaganda are clearly the "smartest" in the the grand scheme of things. Results matter, not propaganda.
SO!!!
Be happy to be die with no children you "feminists"! You serve the bankster slave masters well, your would-be children are the thing they hate the most. So hate your menfolk, hate your children, be a good slave now.
Just please don't reproduce!, we need remove you weak minded fools from the gene pool.
Smart women would have kids if there were men around who would marry and stay married. And go to college and do well and make good money.
But the right sort of men are a rapidly shrinking population. So we don't have so many children. It's men's fault.
What, did you expect smart women to have illegitimate bastards to raise all by themselves?
For that, you need to sex up stupid women.
There's smart wimmin?