Nancy Pelosi Tells CNN What They Can And Cannot Report

[Marener]

But their license isn't protected if they are bought by a political party. We will all watch if it happens huh?

Broadcast licenses can’t be taken away because of protected political speech.

The first amendment prevents the government from discriminating based on content of speech.

So yes, the license is protected.

 

[hadit]

She’s right. Your blob has pre-onset senility. Five minutes of listening to him confirms it.

It never fails. "But, but, but something about a blob that only I can see!!!"

 

[Nostra]

She’s right. Your blob has pre-onset senility. Five minutes of listening to him confirms it.

Link us up to a medical diagnosis of that, Simp.

You and your terminal TDS don't count.

 

[Blaster]

Pelosi is a disgusting old woman with an alcoholic for a husband.

 

[Nostra]

I do.

Because he’s an authoritarian thug who doesn’t understand the first amendment.

Irony.

 

[scruffy]

You do know that Trump wanted ABC to lose their broadcast license because they fact checked him at the debate, right?

The entire MSM should lose their broadcast licenses.

We should cut our losses and start over.

 

[jc456]

Broadcast licenses can’t be taken away because of protected political speech.

The first amendment prevents the government from discriminating based on content of speech.

So yes, the license is protected.

Are you sure?

Fact check: Fairness Doctrine only applied to broadcast licenses, not cable TV like Fox News

Posts on Facebook claim that the end of the Fairness Doctrine under Ronald Reagan spawned Fox News. But the doctrine only applied to broadcast TV.

www.usatoday.com

Recently, a post on Facebook described former President Ronald Reagan as the "The Father of Fake News" and argued to "Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine."

"Ronald Reagan's FCC abolished the Fairness Doctrine which, since 1949, required media to present both sides' opinions in the rare event they weren't just reporting straight news," the post explained.

"A Democrat-controlled Congress passed a bill to re-instate the Fairness Doctrine in 1987. Reagan vetoed the bill," it continued. "Fox News followed in the 1990s. America is now more polarized and misinformed than ever."

 

[ColonelAngus]

A Harris surrogate on Fox got mad at A woman fox anchor for calling out the idiot for not being able to articulate Harris’ platform.

The Harris surrogate said “as a woman, you should not interrupt me.”

DEMS LIVE AND DIE WITH DEMOGRAPHIC INTERSECTIONALITY.

What the **** does the fact that Sandra Smith has a V and not a P have to do with the Harris platform????

Dems are sick in the head. They are truly ill people.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Naturally, the thread title is a lie.

 

[Marener]

Are you sure?

Fact check: Fairness Doctrine only applied to broadcast licenses, not cable TV like Fox News

Posts on Facebook claim that the end of the Fairness Doctrine under Ronald Reagan spawned Fox News. But the doctrine only applied to broadcast TV.

www.usatoday.com

Recently, a post on Facebook described former President Ronald Reagan as the "The Father of Fake News" and argued to "Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine."

"Ronald Reagan's FCC abolished the Fairness Doctrine which, since 1949, required media to present both sides' opinions in the rare event they weren't just reporting straight news," the post explained.

"A Democrat-controlled Congress passed a bill to re-instate the Fairness Doctrine in 1987. Reagan vetoed the bill," it continued. "Fox News followed in the 1990s. America is now more polarized and misinformed than ever."

Fairness doctrine wouldn’t help you.

Trump was actually given ample time to respond. In fact, he spoke significantly more than Harris.

 

[Marener]

Irony.

The only party wanting to use government authority to suppress protected speech no Americans is the Republican Party.

 

[jknowgood]

He still is.

That's why your party threw him under the bus?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That's why your party threw him under the bus?

Kind of like how your party threw the fat orange insurrectionist under the bus.

until they kissed the ring again.

 

[ColonelAngus]

So it’s cool for Melania to run Trump’s cabinet meetings if he wins?

You Dimms have no problem with Jill running Joe’s cabinet meeting.

The Dems live in a world of lies, propaganda and hypocrisy.

 

[jknowgood]

Kind of like how your party threw the fat orange insurrectionist under the bus.

until they kissed the ring again.

Once Trump got the nomination I've supported Trump. So I don't know what you're referring to.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So it’s cool for Melania to run Trump’s cabinet meetings if he wins?

Debunked lie

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Once Trump got the nomination I've supported Trump. So I don't know what you're referring to.

Your party threw Trump under the bus and discarded him.

 

[jc456]

Fairness doctrine wouldn’t help you.

Trump was actually given ample time to respond. In fact, he spoke significantly more than Harris.

no need to argue this with me, he's the one fighting it. I know why. It's your inability to see that hampers your eyes.

 

[Marener]

no need to argue this with me, he's the one fighting it. I know why. It's your inability to see that hampers your eyes.

Both of you are wrong and demonstrate your disrespect for the first amendment.

Your inability to understand what protected speech is hampers your eyes.

 

[jc456]

Both of you are wrong and demonstrate your disrespect for the first amendment.

Your inability to understand what protected speech is hampers your eyes.

sure lawyer superman, you know!!!!