Should Trump pardon his entire administration and his family from future "Lawfare" by democrats? (Poll)

[Mack The Finger]

We all saw how the democrats went after Trump using "Lawfare" after he declared he was running for president.

I am against a blanket pardons !

However when is up for a pardon they should be given special considerations.

 

[Concerned American]

Make it hurt so much the people get sick of political trials before Democrats get in the White House again.

GET SICK? I've had more than my fill of this BS for over six years now. Democrats keep doubling down on the lying, manipulations and temper tantrums.

 

[Concerned American]

I am against a blanket pardons !

However when is up for a pardon they should be given special considerations.

It also depends on what happens in the interim and that all-important '28 election. If the republicans lose, I could see the pardons being done. Don't agree with them, but what I think doesn't make a difference.

 

[Blaster]

Trump can pardon anyone he wants to.

 

[kyzr]

Trump can pardon anyone he wants to.

I'm actually surprised at the responses. No one pushed back that "preemptive pardons are illegal".

I want the DOJ to charge Fau-Chi, Mayorkas, the autopen crew, Hunter Biden, and the others with "preemptive pardons" to let the Supreme Court rule on them. Otherwise Trump can give his global preemptive pardon for anything and everything.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Should Trump pardon his entire administration and his family from future "Lawfare" by democrats?​

None of them will need pardons, unlike AutoPen Joe's Crew of Thugs.

.

UNREAL !

 

[Mack The Finger]

It also depends on what happens in the interim and that all-important '28 election. If the republicans lose, I could see the pardons being done. Don't agree with them, but what I think doesn't make a difference.

GOOD POST-covered all the angles.

 

[struth]

Sadly, until the Demafacist are destroyed, and have a chance to take power, every admin needs to follow the Demafacist protocols

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'm actually surprised at the responses. No one pushed back that "preemptive pardons are illegal".

I want the DOJ to charge Fau-Chi, Mayorkas, the autopen crew, Hunter Biden, and the others with "preemptive pardons" to let the Supreme Court rule on them. Otherwise Trump can give his global preemptive pardon for anything and everything.

There is no ruling on pardons because the Constitution says so in plain text. Why do you think no one has challenged any of the pardons? First, they don't have standing to sue and then second, there is that nasty clause in the Constitution.

 

[kyzr]

There is no ruling on pardons because the Constitution says so in plain text. Why do you think no one has challenged any of the pardons? First, they don't have standing to sue and then second, there is that nasty clause in the Constitution.

Very true. BUT...

ArtII.S2.C1.3.1 Overview of Pardon Power​

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C1-3-1/ALDE_00013316/

"Beyond textual limits, certain external constitutional and legal considerations may act as constraints on the power. For instance, the Court has indicated that the power may be exercised at any time after [an offense’s] commission, (Jump to essay-8Garland, 71 U.S. at 380). reflecting that the President may not preemptively immunize future criminal conduct."

So presidents "preemptively" pardon someone for past crimes, but not charged yet, that is legal, but he can't pardon for crimes after the date of the pardon? The word "preemptively" might have been misused, "blanket pardon" might have been more descriptive for past actions.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Very true. BUT...

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S2-C1-3-1/ALDE_00013316/

"Beyond textual limits, certain external constitutional and legal considerations may act as constraints on the power. For instance, the Court has indicated that the power may be exercised at any time after [an offense’s] commission, (Jump to essay-8Garland, 71 U.S. at 380). reflecting that the President may not preemptively immunize future criminal conduct."

Future criminal conduct is off topic. We are talking lawfare for prosecution for PAST "crimes". Nobody ever said anything about future crimes. Try to stay on topic, but great job in proving yourself wrong!

 

[Man With A Plan]

There is no ruling on pardons because the Constitution says so in plain text. Why do you think no one has challenged any of the pardons? First, they don't have standing to sue and then second, there is that nasty clause in the Constitution.

I'm curious, Admiral...do you think Joe Biden even knew about all of those last minute pardons signed with the auto pen?

 

[22lcidw]

The fact that Democrats like Swalwell are threatening to prosecute anyone who doesn't do what Democrats WANT is the reason why nobody should ever vote for the people now running the Democratic Party! Send them a loud and clear message that the country is sick of their bullshit.

Sadly, the idiots will vote them in again.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I'm curious, Admiral...do you think Joe Biden even knew about all of those last minute pardons signed with the auto pen?

If he doesn't say they are fake, what have you got? A huge nothing-burger!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No, but he will.

 

[ThisIsMe]

We all saw how the democrats went after Trump using "Lawfare" after he declared he was running for president.
So whats to stop democrats from using Lawfare against JD Vance, and/or Pete Hegseth, and/or Marco Rubio, and/or Ron Desantis, and/or anyone acting on his behalf?

"Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California told “CNN News Central” co-host Kate Bolduan on Monday that House Democrats plan to go after private citizens working with the Trump administration..."

MSN

Eric Swalwell Says Democrats Are Going to Target Private Citizens Who Have Worked with Trump​

We all also saw how the Biden autopen gave "preemptive pardons" to the Biden Family members, as well as his administration's enablers.

So let's imagine the next step. Trump writes a preemptive pardon like Biden, to cover his family, and everyone in his administration from prosecution for any actions taken between his inauguration day and his last day in office?

I saw democrats saying that they will prosecute National Guardsmen, ICE members, and anyone who their warped interpretation of lawfare says broke some law.

Sure, just like biden pardoned everyone. On the way out trump should just blanket pardon everyone...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sure, just like biden pardoned everyone. On the way out trump should just blanket pardon everyone...

Everyone, eh?

So it's cool if we just make some shit up in this thread, I guess.

 

[ThisIsMe]

I would be surprised if he didn't.

That's where things are headed: Zero accountability.

Oh my gosh..really? Lol. Smh

 

[ThisIsMe]

Given how vindictive the vile dems are it would be a good idea.

Oh yeah, you know dems are going to go after him posthumously

 

[ThisIsMe]

To avoid pardons, wouldn't the Democrats prosecute at State level?

But you can't prosecute at the state level for Federal crimes, unless you work some shenanigans like alvin bragg.