Should trump kill all Palestinians before killing all Iranians ?

I fear the great man is spreading himself too thin.
Says the Brit-Troll from the Land of Mediocrities.

Surely the Gaza genocide needs to be complete before the Iran killing starts in earnest ?
No genocide is underway in Gaza. If that were the case, Gaza would be a silent and lifeless slag-heap.

Gaza declared war on Israel on October 7, 2023, and is now paying the price for its bloodthirstiness and stupidity.

The Iran regime is a nasty one and trump is just driving Iranians to support them in sympathy.
Doubtful.
This is boneheaded right wing politics that is makng the world a more dangerous place.
Once Iranian nuclear development has been smashed the world will, indeed, be a safer place.

If only there was some treaty that limited Irans nuclear growth.
Given that the Iranian theocracy lies through its teeth and cannot be trusted, any such paper merely channels Neville Chamberlain.
ON my TV news tonight the first 4 items were all trump related. He is a walking disaster for the planet. (Gaza, Iran, Ukraine and the Calgary diva exit)
Immaterial.
 
Says the Brit-Troll from the Land of Mediocrities.


No genocide is underway in Gaza. If that were the case, Gaza would be a silent and lifeless slag-heap.

Gaza declared war on Israel on October 7, 2023, and is now paying the price for its bloodthirstiness and stupidity.


Doubtful.

Once Iranian nuclear development has been smashed the world will, indeed, be a safer place.


Given that the Iranian theocracy lies through its teeth and cannot be trusted, any such paper merely channels Neville Chamberlain.

Immaterial.
RTOBS
 
Not my call. But the news (not RTOBS) tells a story, don't you think?

If Trump does have the US directly bomb Iran, do you think he will bomb random population centers to try to kill as many Iranian civilians as possible, or will he confine himself to military and strategic targets like nuclear processing centers and missile production?
 
If Trump does have the US directly bomb Iran, do you think he will bomb random population centers to try to kill as many Iranian civilians as possible, or will he confine himself to military and strategic targets like nuclear processing centers and missile production?
I have no idea, but he's not doing anything about the deliberate starving of innocent people in Gaza. So giving him the benefit of humanitarian benevolence seems a bit of a stretch.
But that's just me. What do you think?
 
I have no idea, but he's not doing anything about the deliberate starving of innocent people in Gaza. So giving him the benefit of humanitarian benevolence seems a bit of a stretch.
But that's just me. What do you think?
I think you need to stay on topic. Trump may or may not bomb Iranian nuclear sites but he's not going to indiscriminately bomb population centers.
 
I think you need to stay on topic. Trump may or may not bomb Iranian nuclear sites but he's not going to indiscriminately bomb population centers.
You don't know that, but you do know that children are starving to death and he's doing nothing to stop it. In fact, he's supporting it.
 
I fear the great man is spreading himself too thin. Surely the Gaza genocide needs to be complete before the Iran killing starts in earnest ?

The Iran regime is a nasty one and trump is just driving Iranians to support them in sympathy.

This is boneheaded right wing politics that is makng the world a more dangerous place.

If only there was some treaty that limited Irans nuclear growth.

ON my TV news tonight the first 4 items were all trump related. He is a walking disaster for the planet. (Gaza, Iran, Ukraine and the Calgary diva exit)

I don’t think Trump is going to either, but your EU and Brits have done nothing, maybe you should look in your own backyard first.
 
You don't know that, but you do know that children are starving to death and he's doing nothing to stop it. In fact, he's supporting it.
Leaving aside that you don't know that Trump is supporting children starving to death, you are running away from the topic at hand and I will not chase after you. Have a great day.
 
I fear the great man is spreading himself too thin. Surely the Gaza genocide needs to be complete before the Iran killing starts in earnest ?

The Iran regime is a nasty one and trump is just driving Iranians to support them in sympathy.

This is boneheaded right wing politics that is makng the world a more dangerous place.

If only there was some treaty that limited Irans nuclear growth.

ON my TV news tonight the first 4 items were all trump related. He is a walking disaster for the planet. (Gaza, Iran, Ukraine and the Calgary diva exit)


That's a hard one. Flip a coin.

jews sweet jesus.webp
 
Leaving aside that you don't know that Trump is supporting children starving to death, you are running away from the topic at hand and I will not chase after you. Have a great day.
Really?
You don't know that Palestinians are being deliberately starved to death in Gaza and the buffoon is doing nothing to stop it?
The rightard trough of brain slop is a fool's diet.
 
Really?
You don't know that Palestinians are being deliberately starved to death in Gaza and the buffoon is doing nothing to stop it?
The rightard trough of brain slop is a fool's diet.
What's "fake news" about that, papageorge?
Is it like some others, you use that emoji when you can't handle the truth? We see that a lot from regressives and libertardians. Are you one of them?
 
I think you need to stay on topic. Trump may or may not bomb Iranian nuclear sites but he's not going to indiscriminately bomb population centers.
You asked, "why would he?" and I gave you the plain truth that he's not stopping the deliberate starvation of Gazans when he has the perfect opportunity.

Do you still insist he must get the benefit of the doubt of his benevolence?
 
15th post
You asked, "why would he?" and I gave you the plain truth that he's not stopping the deliberate starvation of Gazans when he has the perfect opportunity.

Do you still insist he must get the benefit of the doubt of his benevolence?
Israel and the USA bombed military and nuclear sites and made targeted attacks on individuals. They have not indiscriminately bombed population centers.

OTOH, Iran's response has been to send missiles and drones flying into Tel Aviv and other cities where civilians have been killed and wounded. Including children.
 
Israel and the USA bombed military and nuclear sites and made targeted attacks on individuals. They have not indiscriminately bombed population centers.

OTOH, Iran's response has been to send missiles and drones flying into Tel Aviv and other cities where civilians have been killed and wounded. Including children.

Remember last week when you admonished me for straying off-topic?

Yeah, that was cool.

"Leaving aside that you don't know that Trump is supporting children starving to death, you are running away from the topic at hand and I will not chase after you. Have a great day."

That is what you said, remember? And it was in response to my claiming that since he could have stopped the mass starvation in Gaza, and he didn't, that he cares little about innocent lives.

But now to answer your own question of "Why would he?" (randomly kill civilians), you say (and correct me if I'm wrong) that it's all Iran's fault if Israel has targeted innocent people, but Trump didn't help with that and you can trust that he won't.

Just to remind you of the topic at hand, do you know anything about the deliberate starvation of Gazans and how they could be immediately helped?
 
80% of Iran would like to see the current theocracy removed. Iran is especially good at quelling and crushing dissent. So even though a very small percentage of the people are in charge the force factor of enforcement which is something like 1 to 200 over there keeps them in political iron shackles. Iran has a very rich class of scholarly scientists who could contribute a great deal internationally if they were just let off the hook.

What you are forgetting is that the US destroyed the democracy in Iran in 1953, and murdered tens of thousands of people. So regardless of whether or not the people of Iran like the current theocracy of Iran, they support it 100%, because that is the only way to prevent another murderous US take over.
The US is criminal and can never be trusted.
The uprising against the Shah in 1979 was extremely popular, and the Ayatollah is vastly preferred to the hated US.
 
Talk to the Iranians living in the USA----I was talking to them way back in
the 1960s-----try to find an Iranian today who is not a "ROYALIST"

Wrong.
The Iranians you talked to were part of the corrupt dictatorship of the Shah.
That is like talking to Cubans in Miami.
You are going to get a totally false impression that way.

The vast majority of Iranians hated the Shah and like the Ayatollah.
 
Back
Top Bottom