Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,309
- 99,396
- 3,645
- Thread starter
- #381
If true, that would seem to be reason to DO the interview, not reason to avoid it.He’s broke no laws.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If true, that would seem to be reason to DO the interview, not reason to avoid it.He’s broke no laws.
Well actually, they could try to twist him up and get him on a perjury chargeIf true, that would seem to be reason to DO the interview, not reason to avoid it.He’s broke no laws.
Not true, one must intend to deceive to be guilty of perjury. Errors do not qualify.Well actually, they could try to twist him up and get him on a perjury chargeIf true, that would seem to be reason to DO the interview, not reason to avoid it.He’s broke no laws.
Actually not, just reword a question in several different ways and wait for an answer to change.Not true, one must intend to deceive to be guilty of perjury. Errors do not qualify.Well actually, they could try to twist him up and get him on a perjury chargeIf true, that would seem to be reason to DO the interview, not reason to avoid it.He’s broke no laws.
That alone would not show intent to deceive. You are barking up the wrong tree, here.Actually not, just reword a question in several different ways and wait for an answer to change.
As already posted by folks here, at this point since every rational person knows the Mueller Witch Hunt is a Hussaine Obama/Crooked Hillary Hoax, it would be retarded to participate in it especially being the ultimate target. Nobody in their right mind would treat this scam as a real investigation. The good news is Mueller is going to be investigated and the question is will he allow himself to be interviewed by actual law enforcement officials.
You should yell that louder, no one heard youLiar!!!EverythingNot after the IG report....he would be crazy to sit with that snake Mueller and his den of vipers...
Exactly what did the IG report have to do with Mueller?
Leftist insults, go figure while humiliating handicaps.how bad is your lisp? do you also have a cleft palate?When you have to explain the basic facts of a discussion to a leftwing idiot, you are wasting your time.Okay. Class is in session: "If you do"Wrong, moron:another r&c fail. You just stated people can refuse a subpoenaWrong, moron, you can't refuse a subpoena. If you do the police come and put you in jail.
Post #329: "you can't refuse a subpoena."
If you do what?
The 9/11 mayor has his head far up trumps buttShould he?
I say yes, as the investigation is meant to get to the truth. Trump's interview will advance that goal.
Should Trump agree to an interview with flat earth theorists?
No of course not. His time is precious and should not be wasted on nonsense.
Headlines screamed:
1998 Giuliani debunked 2018 Giuliani on presidents evading subpoenas
Back then, President Trump's lawyer said a president called to testify has "no choice" but to comply.
you are not under oath, but it is considered that you are....the law makes it a crime to lie to FBI investigators just like it is if you lie under oath.... this is why the FBI never has to put any witness interviewed under oath before questioning.Hmmm . . . . .wrong. You are not under oath when you are interviewed by the FBI. There is just a law that says you can't lie to them. I think the law is unconstitutional. However, it doesn't compel you to answer their questions as you are compelled to answer when you are under oath. For what crime would Trump be required to testify before a Grand Jury?whether under oath in a court room, or being officially interviewed by officers of an investigation by the FBI....He not under oath, so call he has to do is tell Herr Mewler to pound sand.He also has the right, to plead the 5th, if he does do the interview....
it is criminal to lie..... the penalty is the same... you can't lie before the FBI, it's a felony, just like in court.....
but was not really talking about being interviewed by the FBI, I was thinking ahead, on the Grand Jury for this investigation, being the ones asking questions, ...he can plead the 5th.
Under oath you are compelled to answer questions. On the other hand, you can tell the FBI to go fuck themselves if you like.you are not under oath, but it is considered that you are....the law makes it a crime to lie to FBI investigators just like it is if you lie under oath.... this is why the FBI never has to put any witness interviewed under oath before questioning.Hmmm . . . . .wrong. You are not under oath when you are interviewed by the FBI. There is just a law that says you can't lie to them. I think the law is unconstitutional. However, it doesn't compel you to answer their questions as you are compelled to answer when you are under oath. For what crime would Trump be required to testify before a Grand Jury?whether under oath in a court room, or being officially interviewed by officers of an investigation by the FBI....He not under oath, so call he has to do is tell Herr Mewler to pound sand.He also has the right, to plead the 5th, if he does do the interview....
it is criminal to lie..... the penalty is the same... you can't lie before the FBI, it's a felony, just like in court.....
but was not really talking about being interviewed by the FBI, I was thinking ahead, on the Grand Jury for this investigation, being the ones asking questions, ...he can plead the 5th.
Tell that to Flynn.That alone would not show intent to deceive. You are barking up the wrong tree, here.Actually not, just reword a question in several different ways and wait for an answer to change.
No, errors do not qualify.
Well actually, they could try to twist him up and get him on a perjury chargeIf true, that would seem to be reason to DO the interview, not reason to avoid it.He’s broke no laws.
How can the AH in our WH avoid that?Well actually, they could try to twist him up and get him on a perjury chargeIf true, that would seem to be reason to DO the interview, not reason to avoid it.He’s broke no laws.
Then do not commit perjury and it won't be a problem!
Why? Flynn pled guilty to lying, not making an error. Again, there is a differenceTell that to Flynn.
Leftist insults, go figure while humiliating handicaps.
especially if you have something to hideUnder oath you are compelled to answer questions. On the other hand, you can tell the FBI to go fuck themselves if you like.
That alone would not show intent to deceive. You are barking up the wrong tree, here.Actually not, just reword a question in several different ways and wait for an answer to change.
No, errors do not qualify.
Tell that to Flynn.
Jared Kushner and the other Jews in Trump's admin are setting him up? Wow! Do David Duke and Jason Kessler know about this?As already posted by folks here, at this point since every rational person knows the Mueller Witch Hunt is a Hussaine Obama/Crooked Hillary Hoax, it would be retarded to participate in it especially being the ultimate target. Nobody in their right mind would treat this scam as a real investigation. The good news is Mueller is going to be investigated and the question is will he allow himself to be interviewed by actual law enforcement officials.
= jewish plot.
Talking down, way down to his opponents Trump set the stage for trumpettes to take after himLeftist insults, go figure while humiliating handicaps.
I try. I try really, really hard to be presidential, but the lying members here keep lying about me.
"You gotta see this guy," says Trump, wildly flailing his arms, his right hand flopping at an odd angle as he shouts in a weird, agitated voice: "Ahh, I don’t know what I said! Ahh, I don’t remember!"
"You should see this guy" - when has he ever prefaced waving his arms or hands with a comment like that?