Should the US join Israel in bombing Iran?

[Moonglow]

Israel made the request but it was rejected by the Trump Administration..for now.

I agree with Trump’s decision.

This is not an American fight.

Do you agree with the Trump Administration decision?

Report: Israel asked US to join military campaign against Iran, but US rejects request

* * *

www.timesofisrael.com

Trump says ‘it’s possible’ US will get involved in Iran-Israel conflict, while urging deal​

US president claims clash ‘may have forced a deal to go quicker,’ says Putin prepared to mediate between warring countries after phone call​

https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-says-its-possible-us-will-get-involved-in-iran-israel-conflict-while-urging-deal/

 

[toomuchtime_]

Trump said a few hours ago he was not ruling out further US involvement in the War.

I don't believe that Israel would have attacked Iran if Trump had not given his consent, despite what Netanyahu and Trump say to the contrary. The US is already knee deep in it anyway.

This is Trump's War, and I hope he can contain it.

Trump says 'it's possible' US gets involved in Israel-Iran conflict

President Donald Trump said Sunday that the U.S. is not involved in Israel's military strikes, but "it's possible we could get involved."

abcnews.go.com

The goal is not to contain the war but to contain Iran's ability to organize and fund wars throughout the ME.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Wouldn't bombing a nuclear facility release radiation into the atmosphere.

Fordow is an enrichment and research center buried deep within a mountain, so no, its destruction would not release much radiation into the atmosphere. The destruction of a working reactor might release dangerous amounts of radiation into the atmosphere, but even in the worst case much less than exploding nuclear weapons would. So, in deciding whether to bomb a reactor to prevent its use in making nuclear weapons, the question is, is it better to risk a small amoung of radiation or to risk a huge cataclysmic release of radiation and destruction in a nuclear exchange?

 

[Ringo]

 

[Grau]

No, I'm not.

Not a single US soldier has fought alongside an Israeli soldier in any conflict since the formation of Israel in 1948. They can defend themselves.

No, Without the aid, weaponry and training of the Nazi SS, Israel would not exist.

Without the $ Trillions in US "Aid" and unlimited weaponry and US Troops defending the genocidal Zionist colony,(1) Israel would be just a greasy smoldering spot on the Levant.

Now, parasitic Israeli lobbies make sure that Americans do the heavy lifting for the government to which you are most loyal:

“QUIETLY LOBBYING CONGRESS TO APPROVE THE USE OF FORCE IN IRAQ WAS ONE OF AIPAC’S SUCCESSES OVER THE PAST YEAR.”

AIPAC Executive Director Howard Kohr; N.Y. Sun, Jan. 2003





(1). "AMERICAN TROOPS HERE TO DEFEND ISRAEL"
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5151907,00.html

EXCERPT "American tactical officers take to the stage, and say they're here to defend the State of Israel and its sovereignty as if they were fighting for their own country. They say they'll do anything to defend Israel. It's moving," he said."CONTINUED

 

[Frankenstein]

Only when they. or a proxy. try any nonsense against any American

 

[BothWings]

I voted

**** no!

I always hoped and told my wife that Trump would eventually take his own stance on Israel. And would not be pro one or the other. I knew and I told her. And I was right. And every man here has the rare opportunity to see that look of true defeat on a woman's face in an argument. It doesn't come often. Smokem while you gottem.

 

[MarathonMike]

Fordow is an enrichment and research center buried deep within a mountain, so no, its destruction would not release much radiation into the atmosphere. The destruction of a working reactor might release dangerous amounts of radiation into the atmosphere, but even in the worst case much less than exploding nuclear weapons would. So, in deciding whether to bomb a reactor to prevent its use in making nuclear weapons, the question is, is it better to risk a small amoung of radiation or to risk a huge cataclysmic release of radiation and destruction in a nuclear exchange?

The IAEA lost credibility when they immediately stated "no background radiation levels detected at Fordow" following the bombing.