Should the former Prince Andrew appear before comgress ?

[Tommy Tainant]

I inderstand that some congress folk are calling for him to give evidence.
I agree with that. Pervs should not be able to hide their crimes.
But all the noise seems to be about hiding the trump guilt.
He should be on trial.
It would be great tv.
But trump will shield Andrew as they have a shared interest.

US Lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna Find Six Others Implicated in Epstein Files

Uncover the latest revelations in the Epstein files as US lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna identify six new individuals in unredacted files.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

1. Unlike various Democrat politicians who joined Epstein on his island, Trump never did, has had no inappropriate relations with young girls, which is more than Biden can claim.
2. As to Prince Andrew, once Islam takes over England (which won't be long now), if Andrew converts to Islam, they will not only forgive him but provide him with an underage girl.

 

[0311]

Totally in agreement.

 

[SaxonJackson]

I inderstand that some congress folk are calling for him to give evidence.
I agree with that. Pervs should not be able to hide their crimes.
But all the noise seems to be about hiding the trump guilt.
He should be on trial.
It would be great tv.
But trump will shield Andrew as they have a shared interest.

US Lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna Find Six Others Implicated in Epstein Files

Uncover the latest revelations in the Epstein files as US lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna identify six new individuals in unredacted files.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

We can rest assured that the most damning evidence is still hidden in the 3 million pages that Bondi has decided to stuff in her ...
Well ... this is a family show so I won't say.

 

[marvin martian]

I inderstand that some congress folk are calling for him to give evidence.
I agree with that. Pervs should not be able to hide their crimes.
But all the noise seems to be about hiding the trump guilt.
He should be on trial.
It would be great tv.
But trump will shield Andrew as they have a shared interest.

US Lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna Find Six Others Implicated in Epstein Files

Uncover the latest revelations in the Epstein files as US lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna identify six new individuals in unredacted files.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

It's up to your king. You need to do whatever he commands.

 

[Eman623]

He's not a former prince. Legally, Prince Andrew is still a prince.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

It's up to your king. You need to do whatever he commands.

The King in England is a mere figure head. The royalty there have no authority over England's laws.
The King has two areas of authority. One is the military and the other is the ability to shutdown both houses of Parliament and form another Parliament. That's it.

 

[Hellokitty]

I inderstand that some congress folk are calling for him to give evidence.
I agree with that. Pervs should not be able to hide their crimes.
But all the noise seems to be about hiding the trump guilt.
He should be on trial.
It would be great tv.
But trump will shield Andrew as they have a shared interest.

US Lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna Find Six Others Implicated in Epstein Files

Uncover the latest revelations in the Epstein files as US lawmakers Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna identify six new individuals in unredacted files.

www.ibtimes.co.uk

Why hasn't your country convicted Andrew?

 

[marvin martian]

The King in England is a mere figure head. The royalty there have no authority over England's laws.
The King has two areas of authority. One is the military and the other is the ability to shutdown both houses of Parliament and form another Parliament. That's it.

I'd say that's pretty big authority over England's laws.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Why hasn't your country convicted Andrew?

What of ?

 

[0311]

Why hasn't your country convicted Andrew?

Because Andrew broke laws in the U.S. NOT the U.K. I know you are slow to understand sometimes, but get freaking real.

 

[Hellokitty]

What of ?

LOL, right what was I thinking, your country protects rape gangs...

 

[0311]

LOL, right what was I thinking, your country protects rape gangs...

You can of course provide proof of you accusation?

 

[marvin martian]

Because Andrew broke laws in the U.S. NOT the U.K. I know you are slow to understand sometimes, but get freaking real.

Oh, that's right, pedophilia is legal in the UK. I forgot.

 

[Hellokitty]

You can of course provide proof of you accusation?

The term "UK rape gangs" commonly refers to a series of scandals involving
"grooming gangs" where groups of men systematically sexually exploited vulnerable children and teenage girls across various towns and cities in the UK. This has been a significant public and political issue for decades, characterized by institutional failures to protect victims and prosecute perpetrators due to a combination of factors, including a fear of being perceived as racist.

Key Details

• Victims: The victims were predominantly working-class white girls, some as young as four, who were often in the care system or from vulnerable backgrounds.
• Perpetrators: In high-profile cases in areas like Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, and Huddersfield, the perpetrators were primarily men of British Pakistani or Asian heritage. The national audit by Baroness Louise Casey confirmed the disproportionate involvement of Asian men in child sexual exploitation in some specific areas like West Yorkshire, Greater Manchester, and South Yorkshire.
• Methods: The perpetrators used grooming tactics, which included plying victims with drugs and alcohol, feigning affection, and using violence and coercion to facilitate sexual abuse by multiple men.
• Institutional Failures: Multiple independent inquiries have identified profound and systemic failures by police, social services, and local councils. Authorities were often hesitant to record or act on the ethnicity of the perpetrators for fear of being labeled racist, which meant the crimes were ignored for decades and victims were failed.
• Recent Developments: In June 2025, the UK government released an audit by Baroness Casey, which pinned the blame on authorities that "shied away from" looking into crimes committed by minorities. The current government has since apologized unequivocally for the failures and announced a full national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs to ensure justice for victims and prevent future harm.

 

[0311]

And

The term "UK rape gangs" commonly refers to a series of scandals involving
"grooming gangs" where groups of men systematically sexually exploited vulnerable children and teenage girls across various towns and cities in the UK. This has been a significant public and political issue for decades, characterized by institutional failures to protect victims and prosecute perpetrators due to a combination of factors, including a fear of being perceived as racist.

Key Details

• Victims: The victims were predominantly working-class white girls, some as young as four, who were often in the care system or from vulnerable backgrounds.
• Perpetrators: In high-profile cases in areas like Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, and Huddersfield, the perpetrators were primarily men of British Pakistani or Asian heritage. The national audit by Baroness Louise Casey confirmed the disproportionate involvement of Asian men in child sexual exploitation in some specific areas like West Yorkshire, Greater Manchester, and South Yorkshire.
• Methods: The perpetrators used grooming tactics, which included plying victims with drugs and alcohol, feigning affection, and using violence and coercion to facilitate sexual abuse by multiple men.
• Institutional Failures: Multiple independent inquiries have identified profound and systemic failures by police, social services, and local councils. Authorities were often hesitant to record or act on the ethnicity of the perpetrators for fear of being labeled racist, which meant the crimes were ignored for decades and victims were failed.
• Recent Developments: In June 2025, the UK government released an audit by Baroness Casey, which pinned the blame on authorities that "shied away from" looking into crimes committed by minorities. The current government has since apologized unequivocally for the failures and announced a full national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs to ensure justice for victims and prevent future harm.

and yet you have no problem with 47's name appearing thousands of times in Epstein Files.

What the laws of Great Britain does has nothing to do with this discussion. How the British deal Prince Andrew is up to them. Your attempt redirection/misdirection of this thread is a failure.