- Moderator
- #321
That’s the only thing that has a chance
And likely only with a Trump appointed judge
Nope, just any judge that follows the law.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That’s the only thing that has a chance
And likely only with a Trump appointed judge
We all know, the people that actually care about America, what has happened to the FBI. Even leftists now admit that maybe, just maybe, the FBI went a little too far and got a little too enthusiastic about their 'missions'
We also know how Kash Patel, Trump's nominee for FBI Director, feels about the FBI. He wants to tear it down. And, the morre I think about it, the more angry I get and the more I agree.
Setting our anger with them aside, can the FBI be saved? I'm interested in hearing, reading, thinking people's thoughts on it.
We’ll never knowNope, just any judge that follows the law.
.
Love those old PASGT Helmets
You don't use viable sources. There are no errors to overturn the jury's decision.MSN
www.msn.com
Any criminal trial requires a unanimous verdict.
Merchan told the jury in the Trump trial that they do not need complete unanimity to convict the former president. He highlighted specifically that if the jurors did not agree on what the crime was, but did agree a crime was committed, he would treat it as a unanimous verdict.
.
"Retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg said last week that former President Donald Trump did in fact request National Guard troops be deployed in Washington D.C. before the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Kellogg said he was present at the time of Trump’s request, and Congress should release his testimony to the public." Source, American Military News. From Reuters: "
Trump wanted troops to protect his supporters at Jan. 6 rally
By Jan Wolfe
May 12, 20217:57 AM MSTUpdated 4 years ago
May 12 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump wanted National Guard troops in Washington to protect his supporters at a Jan. 6 rally that ended with them attacking the U.S. Capitol, leaving five dead, Trump's former Pentagon chief testified on Wednesday.
Former Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller told a House of Representatives panel that he spoke with Trump on Jan. 3, three days before the now-former president's fiery speech that preceded the violence and led to his second impeachment"
How many other sources do you want?
Don't bother. There is NOTHING slow horseshit will accept. No matter what evidence is provided, he will deny, deflect, lie, and drag the goal post a little further.So did former Capitol Police Chief Steven A. Sund who confirmed that the National Guard was requested !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![]()
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.www.npr.org
Which is amazing given the fact that NPR is part of the Mockingbird Media.
Describe in detail your legal credentials. This should include but not be limited to the law school you attended, the states you are licensed to practice in, and the last time you actually did so. Be specific.There were no errors as you will see. Now go sit in the bad lawyers' corner.
Give us your legal credentials. We depend on expert advice, which you have not given to support your allegation. I don't have to rebut your allegation.Describe in detail your legal credentials. This should include but not be limited to the law school you attended, the states you are licensed to practice in, and the last time you actually did so. Be specific.
A jury has to be unanimous on every count. They can't pick one from column a, one from column b and one from column c which is what Marchan instructed them to do in the Jury Instructions. That alone will get the verdict overturned.You don't use viable sources. There are no errors to overturn the jury's decision.
Polly wanna cracker?Give us your legal credentials. We depend on expert advice, which you have not given to support your allegation. I don't have to rebut your allegation.