Should The FBI Be Dismantled?

[Lesh]

And? The case is still open, so your verdict mean nothing, he's not officially convicted until he's sentenced. So feel free to keep pushing the lies and propaganda, America knows the truth. Enjoy your new president.

.

The only reason he wasn’t sentenced is because he won the election.

Hell it’s why he ran

 

[OKTexas]

The only reason he wasn’t sentenced is because he won the election.

Hell it’s why he ran

And the lack of sentencing also prevents an appeal, which he will win.

.

 

[Lesh]

And the lack of sentencing also prevents an appeal, which he will win.

.

Thanks Nostradoofus

 

[OKTexas]

Thanks Nostradoofus

Wow, that perfectly fits the lack of intelligence you've demonstrated so far. LMAO

.

 

[Lesh]

Wow, that perfectly fits the lack of intelligence you've demonstrated so far. LMAO

.

You’re the idiot making stupid predictions

 

[OKTexas]

You’re the idiot making stupid predictions

From the novel use of federal law in a State court to the shit ton of reversable errors the judge made, it's not hard to do.

.

 

[candycorn]

We all know, the people that actually care about America, what has happened to the FBI. Even leftists now admit that maybe, just maybe, the FBI went a little too far and got a little too enthusiastic about their 'missions'

We also know how Kash Patel, Trump's nominee for FBI Director, feels about the FBI. He wants to tear it down. And, the morre I think about it, the more angry I get and the more I agree.

Setting our anger with them aside, can the FBI be saved? I'm interested in hearing, reading, thinking people's thoughts on it.

no.

Don’t be stupid.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So is xiden, they just said he's too senile to prosecute. The new DOJ might not see it that way. And now with the crackhead having immunity, many more charges may be on the way.

.

In what court was he convicted? Oh, he was not? But Trump was!!!

 

[Lesh]

From the novel use of federal law in a State court to the shit ton of reversable errors the judge made, it's not hard to do.

.

Thanks “counselor “

Now go sit in the corner

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

From the novel use of federal law in a State court to the shit ton of reversable errors the judge made, it's not hard to do.

.

There were no errors as you will see. Now go sit in the bad lawyers' corner.

 

[john doe 101]

We all know, the people that actually care about America, what has happened to the FBI. Even leftists now admit that maybe, just maybe, the FBI went a little too far and got a little too enthusiastic about their 'missions'

We also know how Kash Patel, Trump's nominee for FBI Director, feels about the FBI. He wants to tear it down. And, the morre I think about it, the more angry I get and the more I agree.

Setting our anger with them aside, can the FBI be saved? I'm interested in hearing, reading, thinking people's thoughts on it.

Yes you are on the side of law breakers.

 

[john doe 101]

They seem to really only care about non-democrat ones.

They have lost the aura of political neutrality, something they worked hard to get in the 80's and 90's, and have given up on in the 2010's and 2020's.

You need to be on medication.

 

[OKTexas]

Thanks “counselor “

Now go sit in the corner

Perhaps you should pay attention to the news and not propaganda sites. Oh, and practice what you preach.

.

 

[john doe 101]

Perhaps you should pay attention to the news and not propaganda sites. Oh, and practice what you preach.

.

Now get back on twitter and gateway pundit to read your news,

 

[OKTexas]

There were no errors as you will see. Now go sit in the bad lawyers' corner.

MSN

Any criminal trial requires a unanimous verdict.

Merchan told the jury in the Trump trial that they do not need complete unanimity to convict the former president. He highlighted specifically that if the jurors did not agree on what the crime was, but did agree a crime was committed, he would treat it as a unanimous verdict.

Congresswoman highlights possible 'reversible error' in Trump hush money trial jury instructions

Tenney said that she had seen judges removed for far less than the "judicial misconduct" going on in the Trump trial.

justthenews.com

.

 

[Lesh]

MSN

Any criminal trial requires a unanimous verdict.

Merchan told the jury in the Trump trial that they do not need complete unanimity to convict the former president. He highlighted specifically that if the jurors did not agree on what the crime was, but did agree a crime was committed, he would treat it as a unanimous verdict.

Congresswoman highlights possible 'reversible error' in Trump hush money trial jury instructions

Tenney said that she had seen judges removed for far less than the "judicial misconduct" going on in the Trump trial.

justthenews.com

.

Posts misrepresent New York judge’s instructions to jury in Trump hush money trial

False. Merchan said that to convict Trump the jury will have to find unanimously, on each of 34 felony counts, that he falsified business records and that he did so with the intent of concealing another crime — in this case, violating a state election law during his 2016 campaign.

apnews.com

 

[OKTexas]

Posts misrepresent New York judge’s instructions to jury in Trump hush money trial

False. Merchan said that to convict Trump the jury will have to find unanimously, on each of 34 felony counts, that he falsified business records and that he did so with the intent of concealing another crime — in this case, violating a state election law during his 2016 campaign.

apnews.com

ROFLMFAO, from your link:

The judge said jurors could consider three different ways the law may have been broken and that they don’t have to be unanimous on this decision.

That is a reversable error. The jury has to be unanimous on all elements, not take one from column A, B or C.

.

 

[Lesh]

ROFLMFAO, from your link:

The judge said jurors could consider three different ways the law may have been broken and that they don’t have to be unanimous on this decision.

That is a reversable error. The jury has to be unanimous on all elements, not take one from column A, B or C.

.

Possibly. I wouldn’t count on it

Of course Trump put a lot of judges out there and we’ve seen how they rule

 

[OKTexas]

Possibly. I wouldn’t count on it

Of course Trump put a lot of judges out there and we’ve seen how they rule

That's just one, there are many others so I chose to count on it. Of course you're welcome to keep your head buried in the propaganda.

.

 

[Lesh]

That's just one, there are many others so I chose to count on it. Of course you're welcome to keep your head buried in the propaganda.

.

That’s the only thing that has a chance

And likely only with a Trump appointed judge