I don't believe in "temporary insanity"
Excuses be damned
Does that mean you believe what this man did was rational? Do you feel his behavior was definable as sane? If so, what exactly would you consider to be
insane?
The fact that he
surrendered himself in a formal manner plainly suggests he knew he'd done something wrong, punishable, which accommodates the legal definition of sanity. I'm not sure the UCMJ follows the same principles as civilian jurisprudence in this aspect but I strongly doubt it is more lenient and forgiving. So unless there are some extremely unusual circumstances yet to be revealed this fellow might be the first G.I. to face a firing squad in many decades.
But killing him, regardless of the justice aspect, will be no less sad than the deaths and the accompanying miseries he's inflicted. Because in spite of the legal definition of sanity this man clearly has been made crazy by prolonged exposure to virulent mutual hatred and its ultimate expression. The fact that this Army Sergeant was, in the language of the war lovers, sent to Afghanistan
"in service to his country" cannot be ignored.
The bottom line is this Army Sergeant is an American. And we are Americans. In the eyes of the world, mainly the Islamic world, what this man has done was done in our names. Just as the invasion of Iraq was done in our names. Just as Abu Ghraib was created in our names. Just as Haditha was done in our names. Just as every bullet fired in Afghanistan is fired in our names. Americans did it. All of it.
This Sergeant probably will be shot, mainly as an expedient gesture of appeasement. But the real injustice resides in the fact that George W. Bush was allowed to walk away smiling, along with Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, George Tenet, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice and every other member of the evil conspiracy which has made America the most despised nation in the world. There is absolutely nothing "temporarily insane" about what those conniving, self-serving bastards did.