Should FDR of been allowed to fire Humphrey for a difference of political

[Penelope]

opinion, the Supreme Court at the time said no.

Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935),[1] was a United States Supreme Court case decided during the Franklin Delano Roosevelt presidency, regarding the powers that a President of the United States has to remove certain executive officials of a "quasi-legislative," "quasi-judicial" administrative body created by Congress, for purely political reasons and without the consent of Congress.

Roosevelt was dissatisfied with William Humphrey, a member of the Federal Trade Commission, as Humphrey did not, in Roosevelt's view, support his New Deal policies vigorously enough

Humphrey's Executor v. United States
------------------------------------------------------

Kav says yes. He wants the President to have full control. I wonder why Obama didn't take the bait.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

No.

Where did Kavanaugh say yes?

 

[depotoo]

No.

Where did Kavanaugh say yes?

She is repeating hearsay.
Kavanaugh has stated he believes in following the Constitution, which they can’t stand.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

No.

Where did Kavanaugh say yes?

She is repeating hearsay.
Kavanaugh has stated he believes in following the Constitution, which they can’t stand.

I figured.