I can’t believe you are trying to make case that somehow slavery in America was somehow betterAny free society is obliged to 'live and let live' regarding religions. When a religion has principles that are contrary to the rest of that society, intellectual campaigns pointing out differences and perceived errors should also be able to be presented. Society protecting a religion from criticism should not be tolerated.
"NAMBLA" logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained.-Stirling S. Newberry-
A saner, more practical response is Jefferson's solution to such social problems:
Every society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.
Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816
The Founders were quite fond of deportation.
Thomas Jefferson...he was a slaver owner right?
UInlike Muslim slavers, he never subjected hi male slaves to full frontal castration. If you think you can make a moral equivalency argument between Americans, where the importation of slaves outlawed within a mere decade or so after its founding, and gone in another 6 decades, with Islam's history, ore the treatment of them at any time, you will lose badly.
The Peanut Gallery can also note how few blacks there are in the ME today, after many centuries of trading in African slaves. That's because the Arabs murdered them all, and still do when they outlive their 'usefulness'.
That is truly pathetic. As to blacks in the ME...ever checked out Egypt? Libya? Morocco?
You just want to lie about it and make it 'equivalent' to what your ilk did. The fact is slavery in the U.S. was more benign than the slavery under Islam or anywhere else in the world. We know slaves fared better than so-called 'free labor' in northern industrial states and mining camps and bonanza farms, having better heath and longer lifespans, for just one example.They were treated much better than most white American labor. Being 'free' wasn't much of a 'benefit' in the 17th to 19th centuries for the average immigrant worker.
You really think the Irish and German laborers were better off than slaves? lol that's a hoot.
You want to watch Hollywood rubbish and pretend they all got severely whipped and raped every day and whatever other bullshit mythology stupid propagandists go ahead, you will just be idiots. We know they almost all stayed after being freed, no big rush back to Africa, and we also note your Islamo-countries aren't having to fight off illegal immigrants rushing in to benefit from the Glorious Umma anywhere in the world. I can't believe you still think you sell your vile filthy cult as a 'religion'. I guess like the rest of the MSM and the left wing you know your credibility is non-existent so you have nothing to lose by repeatedly lying over and over and over at this point. there is no comparison between slavery as practiced in the U.S. and the Islamo-Land practices, which is still a major industry today in your little Wonder states.