There are half the ships in service now that were when Reagan left office. Since 9/11 they are being expected to do far more around the world. The Navy is trying to keep up, but adequate time for training is suffering. So say the most informed folks I've heard discuss it. Because new sailors are arriving without proper training, they are getting "on the job" training on the watch, by other sailors who are pulling extra shifts to do it after a full day. So they're exhausted and the newbies aren't adequately trained. Sounds like an invitation to accidents to me.Well if there is a warning system already in place then it isn't working very well. In both collisions, these were not quickly turning ships, they were huge tankers. Are you saying it can't be done? We can't implement an automated collision avoidance system that actually works on a Navy ship? It may not cover every scenario but we can certainly improve what we have and I think they will be.I get it that ships don't have brakes like cars, but then neither do jets. The point is to have your system sound a warning when a ship is closing in and make an evasive maneuver AWAY from the incoming ship. That way, instead of being T-boned by a million ton tanker maybe it turns into a glancing blow or we avoid them altogether.
Like I said.........you have to calculate relative bearing and speed, and compare that to what your ship is doing. Yes, there is a warning system already onboard, but like I said, if you have an error in your math, you will have an error in where your ship is or where it is going to be, and that is one of the main problems. And, like I said, if the other ship makes an unexpected maneuver and they don't tell you what they are doing, you won't know where they will be until you RECALCULATE their relative bearing and speed. If they are moving too fast in their closure rate, there may not be enough time for evasive maneuvers.
And yes, even jets have had mid air collisions. It's rare, but it has happened.
Same thing with other drivers that make moves that you don't expect. If that happens, you end up in a crash.
Unless they have radically changed things since I was in, OJT was the primary source of training. Yes, I went to "A" school for PN, but they only taught me the basics, and told me that the rest of what I had to know I would learn in the fleet. There was also a quote, "there's the right way, the wrong way, and the Navy way" meaning that you could follow the exact letter of the law, and get stuff done really slow, take shortcuts and possibly end up with the wrong result, or you could take shortcuts that had been tried and tested over the years, that resulted in a proper outcome. That was the Navy way.
As far as learning your watches? Ship types vary, and so do the watches that each one requires, so OJT (on the job training) is the preferred method to do so. And, you aren't put on a watch by yourself, you are put on one with an older, experienced person who trains you in standing the watch as you do it.
No, the older sailors training the newer sailors don't stand extra watches to do so, they train them as they stand watch with them as supervisor, or they train them in their workspace during normal working hours. Military stuff doesn't work like civilian stuff does.