Sharia Law vs. the Constitution

Book of Jeremiah

Platinum Member
Nov 3, 2012
37,635
4,526
1,170
A Guide to Shariah Law vs. the Constitution | The Counter Jihad Report



A Guide to Shariah Law vs. the Constitution


In 2011, the Center for Security Policy assembled a 2 page flyer that succinctly explains the differences between the rights guaranteed in the US Constitution and Shariah.



"A Guide to Shariah Law vs. the Constitution" is available as a downloadable PDF file. The text is provided below.



ARTICLE VI : THE CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND

CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE VI: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby."

SHARIAH: "The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah." a1.1, Umdat al Salik (in English: ) The Reliance of the Traveller, the commonly accepted work of [desk reference/handbook of] Shariah jurisprudence); "There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia,"-Seyed Qutb [father of modern Muslim Brotherhood]; "Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program." -Seyed Abul A'ala Maududi (revived Deobandi School of thought, similar to Muslim Brotherhood, and founder of Jamaat-e-Islami, aka, the Pakistani Islamic Group, which is MOA, the Homegrown Jihad camps in the U.S.)



FIRST AMENDMENT : FREEDOM OF RELIGION

CONSTITUTION: FIRST AMENDMENT: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

SHARIAH: "Those who reject Islam must be killed. If they turn back (from Islam), take hold of them and kill them wherever you find them." Qur'an 4:89. [The Qur'an is the uncreated word of the Islamic god, Allah.] "Whoever changed his [Islamic] religion, then kill him,"-Hadith [something Muhammad said] of Sahih [authority on things Muhammad said] Al-Bukhari, 9:84:57. In historic and modern Shariah states, Shariah law enforces dhimmi status (second-class citizen, apartheid-type laws) on non-Muslims, prohibiting them from observing their religious practices publicly, building or repairing churches, raising their voices during prayer or ringing church bells; if dhimmi laws are violated in the Shariah State, penalties are those used for prisoners of war: death, slavery, release or ransom. o9.14, o11.0-*o11.11, Umdat Al-Salik



FIRST AMENDMENT : FREEDOM OF SPEECH

CONSTITUTION: FIRST AMENDMENT: Congress shall not abridge "the freedom of speech."
SHARIAH: Speech defaming Islam or Muhammad is considered "blasphemy" and is punishable by death or imprisonment.



FIRST AMENDMENT : FREEDOM TO DISSENT

CONSTITUTION: FIRST AMENDMENT: "Congress cannot take away the right of the people to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

SHARIAH: Non-Muslims are not to harbor any hostility toward the Islamic state or give comfort to those who disagree with Islamic government.



SECOND AMENDMENT : RIGHT TO SELF-*DEFENSE

CONSTITUTION: SECOND AMENDMENT: "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

SHARIAH: Under historic and modern dhimmi laws, non-Muslims cannot possess swords, firearms, or weapons of any kind.



FIFTH, SIXTH & SEVENTH AMENDMENTS : RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS AND FAIR TRIAL

CONSTITUTION: FIFTH AMENDMENT: "no person shall be held to answer for a capital or other- wise infamous crime... without due process of law." SIXTH AMENDMENT: guarantees a "public trial by an impartial jury." SEVENTH AMENDMENT: "the right of trial by jury shall be preserved."

SHARIAH: "Muhammad said, 'No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir (infidel).'" Hadith of Sahih Al-*Bukhari Non-Muslims are prohibited from testifying against Muslims. A woman's testimony is equal to half of a man's.



EIGHTH AMENDMENT : NO CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT

CONSTITUTION: EIGHTH AMENDMENT: "nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

SHARIAH: Under Shariah, punishments are barbaric: "Cut off the hands of thieves, whether they are male or female, as punishment for what they have done - a deterrent from Allah." QURAN 5:38 A raped woman is punished: "The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication - flog each of them with a hundred stripes" SURA 24:2



FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT : RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION AND DUE PROCESS

CONSTITUTION: FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Shariah: Under dhimmi laws enforced in modern Shariah states, Jews, Christians and other non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims before the law. Under Shariah law, women, girls, apostates [those who leave Islam], homosexuals, and "blasphemers" [anyone (not necessarily just Muslims) who says anything against Islam] are all denied equality under the law.
 
Sunni, I put up this thread especially for you as you seem to not understand the differences between Sharia and our constitution. I hope this helps you understand exactly what it is that Oklahoma is keeping out of their courtrooms. No offense but when in America? Do it the American way! America law for american courtrooms. Thanks. - Jeri
 
Because it is a political issue. Not a debate. There is no debate over which rules our land. It is the constitution of the united states. Of course. Therein the decision for ALAC in Oklahoma. - Jeri
 
Sunni, I put up this thread especially for you as you seem to not understand the differences between Sharia and our constitution. I hope this helps you understand exactly what it is that Oklahoma is keeping out of their courtrooms. No offense but when in America? Do it the American way! America law for american courtrooms. Thanks. - Jeri


Oklahoma is NOT keeping Sharia out of their courtrooms. The Constitution and legal precedent already does that. All the GOP-dominated Oklahoma legislature has done is make you THINK they've done something grand.
 
Why don't you research ALAC and the battle CAIR has waged against those working for ALAC? You would not be seeing that type of resistance if there were not something very big at stake. Wake up, Oldguy! This is a serious issue.
 
Please keep it polite. We don't want this thread landing in badlands!

Then quit acting like this some sort of conspiracy and give us a solid cite that shows how Sharia Law has actually been applied. The contention isn't that Sharia and the Constitution are different, but whether it's actually being applied in US courtrooms.
 
CHRISTIAN LAW: "If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives." Leviticus 20:13. "Whoever would not seek the Lord, the God of Israel, should be put to death, whether young or old, man or woman." 2 Chronicles 15:13.

"Suppose you hear in one of the towns the LORD your God is giving you that some worthless rabble among you have led their fellow citizens astray by encouraging them to worship foreign gods. In such cases, you must examine the facts carefully. If you find it is true and can prove that such a detestable act has occurred among you, you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock." Deuteronomy 13:13-19.

"If your own full brother, or your son or daughter, or your beloved wife, or you intimate friend, entices you secretly to serve other gods, whom you and your fathers have not known, gods of any other nations, near at hand or far away, from one end of the earth to the other: do not yield to him or listen to him, nor look with pity upon him, to spare or shield him, but kill him." Deuteronomy 13:7-12.

I think the King James version of that last one is better: "8 Thou shalt not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him:

"9 But thou shalt surely kill him; thine hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people.

"10 And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the Lord thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage."
 
Last edited:
Why don't you research ALAC and the battle CAIR has waged against those working for ALAC? You would not be seeing that type of resistance if there were not something very big at stake. Wake up, Oldguy! This is a serious issue.


There are a LOT of people and organizations fighting the extremist, troglodyte, regressive, pro-corporate ideologues at ALAC, their compliant Republican politician's and their fathers, the Koch brothers. If CAIR is part of that resistance, I say good for them.
 
Please keep it polite. We don't want this thread landing in badlands!

Then quit acting like this some sort of conspiracy and give us a solid cite that shows how Sharia Law has actually been applied. The contention isn't that Sharia and the Constitution are different, but whether it's actually being applied in US courtrooms.
Perhaps because keeping Sharia law from being applied is what is being discussed and what is at stake. You do understand preventative measures, right?
 
Please keep it polite. We don't want this thread landing in badlands!

Then quit acting like this some sort of conspiracy and give us a solid cite that shows how Sharia Law has actually been applied. The contention isn't that Sharia and the Constitution are different, but whether it's actually being applied in US courtrooms.
Perhaps because keeping Sharia law from being applied is what is being discussed and what is at stake. You do understand preventative measures, right?


:clap2:


That is what American Law for American Courtrooms is all about. Thank you.
 
Please keep it polite. We don't want this thread landing in badlands!

Then quit acting like this some sort of conspiracy and give us a solid cite that shows how Sharia Law has actually been applied. The contention isn't that Sharia and the Constitution are different, but whether it's actually being applied in US courtrooms.
Perhaps because keeping Sharia law from being applied is what is being discussed and what is at stake. You do understand preventative measures, right?

Where's the evidence that courts have considering applying it? That's what I'd like to discuss. That OK with you?
 
Here in Merka, we keep our religion from mixing with our gubmint. We would not want to be stoning adulteresses in the public square as the Christian bible tells us to do, no? And no more scarlet letters, yes?

We would not want to be killing unbleevers as the Bible tells us to do, no?

Christian Law is way too barbaric for modern times. Thank God our Founders realized this, no pun intended.

These johnny come lately Sharia peeps will have to have this all 'splaned to 'em. But don't it just give you a chuckle the bible-thumpers act all holier than thou about it? :lol:

Mebbe they think we should put the Moors in stocks so's we can throw tomatoes at them.
 
Last edited:
Then quit acting like this some sort of conspiracy and give us a solid cite that shows how Sharia Law has actually been applied. The contention isn't that Sharia and the Constitution are different, but whether it's actually being applied in US courtrooms.
Perhaps because keeping Sharia law from being applied is what is being discussed and what is at stake. You do understand preventative measures, right?

:clap2:

That is what American Law for American Courtrooms is all about. Thank you.

i.e., you're shitting your pants over a "maybe". God forbid there be actual evidence that it's being considered. :cuckoo:
 
Please keep it polite. We don't want this thread landing in badlands!

Then quit acting like this some sort of conspiracy and give us a solid cite that shows how Sharia Law has actually been applied. The contention isn't that Sharia and the Constitution are different, but whether it's actually being applied in US courtrooms.

Here are a few stories:

Shariah in American Courts
shariahinamericancourts.com... or decisions were brought to bear upon the case. ... (Islamic law) and American ... than one or two cases of Shariah law in U.S. state court ...
Sharia Law cited, used and awarded in 23 court case across America ...
yourdaddy.net/2011/06/01/sharia-law-cited-used-and-awarded-in-23...It has been reported that only one or two prime cases have been in the news about the use of Sharia law in American ... court case across America ... history ...
Videos of case histories of sharia law in american courtrooms
bing.com/videos
Click to view
6:16Police Defending Islam Usurping t…YouTubeClick to viewBuying & Selling Used Goods Ma…YouTubeClick to view
0:27Huge Win! AFDI First Amendmen…YouTubeClick to viewATHEOPHOBIA: The Persecution …YouTube.Sharia Law Deciding American Court Cases - California Political ...
capoliticalnews.com/.../12/11/sharia-law-deciding-american-court-casesIn parts of this nation, American laws are no longer the controlling factor.Stay away from Michigan, many parts are now using Sharia religious law and you could ...
Muslim-only towns in America - US Message Board - Political ...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/www.usmessageboard.com/politics/196371-muslim-only...2 days ago
Last updated: Nov 29, 2011 · 15 posts · First post: Nov 29, 2011
jihad and unconstitutional sharia law spreading in America ... The Case for Banning Sharia Law in America ... living under sharia law. The moment one court allows ...
SHARIA IN AMERICA | The Role of Shari’a Law in U.S. Courts
shariainamerica.comCo-founder of Sharia In America Blog and Rutgers Law School Adjunct Professor Abed Awad, ... The Court emphasized that the parties’ Muslim marriage, ...
Federal Appeals Court Considers Sharia Law - ABC News
abcnews.go.com/.../2011/09/federal-appeals-court-considers-sharia-law
Sep 12, 2011 · ... the use of Sharia law in state court, ... the merits of their case going forward. In court documents ... sharia law and Islam from America

sorry! I tried twice pasting these and the links are not coming up. You'll have to look these up. Look up sharia law in Michigan courtrooms and you should be able to find plenty. It's a real threat to our courts. ALAC is the solution. - J.
 
Last edited:
Please keep it polite. We don't want this thread landing in badlands!

Then quit acting like this some sort of conspiracy and give us a solid cite that shows how Sharia Law has actually been applied. The contention isn't that Sharia and the Constitution are different, but whether it's actually being applied in US courtrooms.
Perhaps because keeping Sharia law from being applied is what is being discussed and what is at stake. You do understand preventative measures, right?

What's at stake? Nothing.

We have a country that is 79% Christian and .6% Muslim.

Despite those numbers our Constitution and our citizens have managed to prevent Christian religious fundamentalists from forcing religious law onto us - despite a large number of sympathetic elected officials. What makes you think that .6% of American Muslims are:
1. Enough to force Sharia
2. Overcome Constitutional Law
3. Even WANT Sharia?

Seriously. This is like preventative measures for a Zombie invasion.
 

Forum List

Back
Top