Zone1 Sharia in Action

[PeterPilot]

We have more Talmudic influence here in the US than we have Sharia. Here is just a bit.

The Noahide Code​

The Institute of Noahide Code is a non-governmental organization (NGO) with UN ECOSOC consultative status dedicated to promoting world peace through the Seven Noahide Laws.

Non-government organizations [NGO]​

Choice tool of subversion, destabilization and domination for the New World Order. 2016 NGOs: Choice Tool of Subversion for the New World Order



The Institute of Noahide Code recruits parliamentarians from all UN member states who share the goal of implementing these UN resolutions into national legislation. United Nations Civil Society Participation – Activities

Governor flanked by Chabad Lubavitch endorses Noahide Laws in Texas​

Mar 27, 2026

The proclamation signed by Greg Abbott is officially symbolic. The real issue is not direct enforcement. No country currently enforces Noahide law as a legal code. The issue is indirect integration. Governments already justify these declarations by claiming they reflect universal ethics embedded in existing law. That argument creates a bridge. Once crossed, laws can align with Noahide principles without ever naming them. Influence replaces explicit adoption. Noahide Laws - Legal Death Penalty for Christians

 

[ding]

I do love AI, it is a great search and image generation tool. It is NOT a credible witness and is NOT without bias.

You are arguing against yourself here. The machine can't be biased. The data might be biased. But in this case that data is literally the Bible. So if you are arguing the Bible is biased towards a merciful God rather than a hateful and vengeful God, I would agree. So given that the Bible itself is biased towards a merciful God and you have reached the opposite conclusion, I can only wonder how you arrive at that conclusion if you are using the Bible.

You cherry pick what supports your position.

I didn't. I read it objectively.

If it is good, God did it, if it is bad, man did it.

And yet, not everything man did is bad and that wasn't credited to God. You do realize that 3000 years ago it was pretty brutal, right. Where is your righteous indignation over that? Why do you only reserve it for a people who raised standards? Render to man what is man's and render to God what is God's. God created existence and all of existence is good. Even the parts you don't like.

If it is good, it is historical, if it is bad, it is an embellishment and not a historical fact.

Not true. You have to read each account in context. I literally tried to get you to do that with me and you declined.

 

[alang1216]

You are arguing against yourself here. The machine can't be biased. The data might be biased. But in this case that data is literally the Bible. So if you are arguing the Bible is biased towards a merciful God rather than a hateful and vengeful God, I would agree. So given that the Bible itself is biased towards a merciful God and you have reached the opposite conclusion, I can only wonder how you arrive at that conclusion if you are using the Bible.

Scripture is only a tiny part of the AI training data and the NT is only a tiny part of that. The training data also probably includes pretty much everything you, and everyone else, have written about the bible over the millennia. Probably since most companies don't make their data public.

And yet, not everything man did is bad and that wasn't credited to God. You do realize that 3000 years ago it was pretty brutal, right. Where is your righteous indignation over that? Why do you only reserve it for a people who raised standards? Render to man what is man's and render to God what is God's. God created existence and all of existence is good. Even the parts you don't like.

There is lots of brutality in the OT, you seem able to separate what is man's and what is God's, just as you can discern historical fact from theological embellishment. Seems to me you have essentially written you own bible.

Not true. You have to read each account in context. I literally tried to get you to do that with me and you declined.

Wasn't that what the Bullpen was for?

 

[ding]

Scripture is only a tiny part of the AI training data and the NT is only a tiny part of that. The training data also probably includes pretty much everything you, and everyone else, have written about the bible over the millennia. Probably since most companies don't make their data public.

I think you are missing the point. What AI is telling you is that the Bible is biased towards God being merciful instead of punitive. So anyone who reads the bible should come away with that message. Because that is how the Bible is skewed. But that's not how you read it. You look past the bible being skewed towards God's mercy and conclude the Bible isn't skewed towards mercy, it is skewed towards God being punitive.

The problem lies with you.

There is lots of brutality in the OT,

Yes, and apparently you think it's all God.

you seem able to separate what is man's and what is God's

You have to walk through it case by case. I've done that. Have you?

, just as you can discern historical fact from theological embellishment. Seems to me you have essentially written you own bible.

No. It seems you have reached a diametrically opposite conclusion than AI has reached based off of the exact same dataset. Here is where you need to pause and reflect on what this is telling you. You read the bible to confirm your bias. A machine read the same bible and concluded that the Bible was written to show that God is merciful.

 

[alang1216]

I think you are missing the point. What AI is telling you is that the Bible is biased towards God being merciful instead of punitive. So anyone who reads the bible should come away with that message. Because that is how the Bible is skewed. But that's not how you read it. You look past the bible being skewed towards God's mercy and conclude the Bible isn't skewed towards mercy, it is skewed towards God being punitive.

The problem lies with you.

I don't get my theology from AI and you shouldn't either.

Yes, and apparently you think it's all God.

He certainly gets credit for lots of that brutality.

You have to walk through it case by case. I've done that. Have you?

Great but why should I trust your interpretations? Many believe every word is literally true.

No. It seems you have reached a diametrically opposite conclusion than AI has reached based off of the exact same dataset. Here is where you need to pause and reflect on what this is telling you. You read the bible to confirm your bias. A machine read the same bible and concluded that the Bible was written to show that God is merciful.

You have a link showing the AI's dataset?

 

[ding]

I don't get my theology from AI and you shouldn't either.

You are making this worse. Just admit your bias.

He certainly gets credit for lots of that brutality.

And none for mercy.

Great but why should I trust your interpretations? Many believe every word is literally true.

Then don't.

You have a link showing the AI's dataset?

It's called the bible.

 

[alang1216]

It's called the bible.

I don't think you understand how AI or the bible are made.

 

[ding]

I don't think you understand how AI or the bible are made.

Because AI spit out something that contradicted your belief? The problem is you. The problem has always been you.

 

[alang1216]

Because AI spit out something that contradicted your belief? The problem is you. The problem has always been you.

AI biblical hallucinations occur when Large Language Models (LLMs) confidently generate false, fabricated, or inaccurate information about scripture, theology, or biblical history. Examples include mixing up stories, fabricating verses, misinterpreting prophetic imagery, or creating theological contradictions, often appearing as "false intuitions".
AI and Faith +1
Examples of AI biblical hallucinations include:

• Fabricated Verse Citations: An AI might confidently quote a "verse" that does not exist in the Bible, combining themes from different books to create a fake passage that sounds plausible.
• Misinterpreted Prophecy/Imagery: When analyzing complex, metaphorical text, such as the Book of Ezekiel, AI may invent historical contexts or misinterpret symbols, leading to completely inaccurate interpretations of apocalyptic literature.
• Reimagining Stories: AI tools, when asked to generate visual or textual content, might alter the core narrative of a Bible story to make it more dramatic, essentially creating a "new" version that lacks scriptural fidelity.
• "AI'splaining" Falsehoods: AI may insist on a false narrative, such as misrepresenting key events or theological figures, and fail to correct itself even when challenged, acting as a confident source of misinformation.
  Substack +4

Why These Happen

• Lack of Comprehension: Models predict the next most likely word rather than understanding the spiritual or historical context of the text.
• Pattern Recognition Over Truth: AI is designed for language generation, meaning it may prioritize a "good story" over factual or scriptural accuracy.
• Latent Space Errors: When navigating "latent space" (the hidden, compressed database of AI knowledge), models can make faulty connections between different topics.
  Substack +4

These hallucinations are particularly dangerous as they can subtly influence theological understanding, leading to "false intuitions" and inaccuracies that feel authentic to a user.

 

[ding]

AI biblical hallucinations occur when Large Language Models (LLMs) confidently generate false, fabricated, or inaccurate information about scripture, theology, or biblical history. Examples include mixing up stories, fabricating verses, misinterpreting prophetic imagery, or creating theological contradictions, often appearing as "false intuitions".
AI and Faith +1
Examples of AI biblical hallucinations include:

• Fabricated Verse Citations: An AI might confidently quote a "verse" that does not exist in the Bible, combining themes from different books to create a fake passage that sounds plausible.
• Misinterpreted Prophecy/Imagery: When analyzing complex, metaphorical text, such as the Book of Ezekiel, AI may invent historical contexts or misinterpret symbols, leading to completely inaccurate interpretations of apocalyptic literature.
• Reimagining Stories: AI tools, when asked to generate visual or textual content, might alter the core narrative of a Bible story to make it more dramatic, essentially creating a "new" version that lacks scriptural fidelity.
• "AI'splaining" Falsehoods: AI may insist on a false narrative, such as misrepresenting key events or theological figures, and fail to correct itself even when challenged, acting as a confident source of misinformation.
  Substack +4

Why These Happen

• Lack of Comprehension: Models predict the next most likely word rather than understanding the spiritual or historical context of the text.
• Pattern Recognition Over Truth: AI is designed for language generation, meaning it may prioritize a "good story" over factual or scriptural accuracy.
• Latent Space Errors: When navigating "latent space" (the hidden, compressed database of AI knowledge), models can make faulty connections between different topics.
  Substack +4

These hallucinations are particularly dangerous as they can subtly influence theological understanding, leading to "false intuitions" and inaccuracies that feel authentic to a user.

Is that what you think AI did? My my my... look at you turning on what you worshipped just the other day.

Maybe attack the logic it presented for it's basis. If it was hallucinating as you claim, you could easily prove it using its logic against it. Just like I could easily prove you didn't see a pink and purple talking cat that melted into the couch when you were on LSD.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

I asked a Muslim friend about the US making Sharia Law the law of the land. He said he didn't care either way since his family already lived by it. He wouldn't cut off anyone's hand any more than a Christian or Jew would stone an adulterer.

When the Christian Lebanese let the Muslims into Lebanon, it was peaceful while the Muslims were in small numbers. The Christians believed that their Muslim neighbors were their friends, but once the number of Muslims exploded, the Muslims who "acted" like they were the Christian's friends, turned on the Christians and began attacking them. Hence the Christian vs Muslim war in the 80's and the intervention of the "International Peace Keeping Force" involvement, of which I was a part.
Ex-Muslim Ayaan Hirsi Ali (born and raised into that religion) has said that the only difference between what the west calls a "radical" Muslim and a "moderate" Muslim, is that while the radical Muslim is in the process of stabbing you, the moderate is the one holding you down.
As long as their numbers are extremely small, they will indeed get along with you, but once the numbers increase substantially, you can expect and indeed get, violence. Those not actually out there attacking you are those that a large family and work to feed them, but they happily send out their kids to do the violence.
When you hear their Mullahs, Ayatollahs, Imams, call out for the killing of non-believers....BELIEVE THEM! Their goal is that only Islam should survive.

 

[alang1216]

Is that what you think AI did? My my my... look at you turning on what you worshipped just the other day.

AI is a great tool, and getting better every day. A smart phone is also a great tool but I wouldn't use it to shovel snow.

Maybe attack the logic it presented for it's basis. If it was hallucinating as you claim, you could easily prove it using its logic against it. Just like I could easily prove you didn't see a pink and purple talking cat that melted into the couch when you were on LSD.

AI is a black box so I don't know what logic you are talking about. And how do you know about my purple talking cat?

 

[ding]

AI is a great tool, and getting better every day. A smart phone is also a great tool but I wouldn't use it to shovel snow.

Like I said before... AI is great at recognizing patterns in large amounts of data. Try googling it.

AI is a black box so I don't know what logic you are talking about.

You don't understand that the reasons it spits out for its conclusions are considered a form of logic?

And how do you know about my purple talking cat?

The Holy Ghost told me.

1. People who believe in the God of Abraham believe that God's mercy exceeds his punishment.
2. People who don't believe in the God of Abraham believe that God's punishment exceeds his mercy.
3. Both are biased.
4. AI - which has no bias other than the bias of the dataset it uses to identify patterns - concluded the Bible's bias is that God's mercy exceeds his punishment.
5. Your bias overrode the Bibles bias. AI didn't.

 

[alang1216]

Like I said before... AI is great at recognizing patterns in large amounts of data. Try googling it.

Don't need to, I recently finished several books on the subject. AI is great at recognizing patterns in large amounts of data, the bible is NOT a large amount of data for a LLM.

You don't understand that the reasons it spits out for its conclusions are considered a form of logic?

The 'logic' is a guess of what comes next and is unknown to even the creators of the AI.

The Holy Ghost told me.

1. People who believe in the God of Abraham believe that God's mercy exceeds his punishment.
2. People who don't believe in the God of Abraham believe that God's punishment exceeds his mercy.
3. Both are biased.
4. AI - which has no bias other than the bias of the dataset it uses to identify patterns - concluded the Bible's bias is that God's mercy exceeds his punishment.
5. Your bias overrode the Bibles bias. AI didn't.

You only agree with AI because it reinforces your bias. Is God always merciful or just predominantly merciful?

 

[ding]

Don't need to, I recently finished several books on the subject. AI is great at recognizing patterns in large amounts of data, the bible is NOT a large amount of data for a LLM.

According to AI... the Bible is considered to be a massive, complex, and unique collection of information, spanning 66 to 81 books (depending on version) covering history, poetry, prophecy, and theology. It is the most printed, translated, and distributed book in human history, with over 5 billion copies in circulation, providing significant documentation on ancient culture.

The 'logic' is a guess of what comes next and is unknown to even the creators of the AI.

The logic was this:
The Bible presents God as possessing both mercy and punitive (judgmental) attributes, often describing them as working together rather than in opposition. Although the Old Testament is often associated with God's punishment, it mentions God's mercy over four times as much as the New Testament.

The Bible describes God as "merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy". Examples of mercy include... Holding back judgment to allow time for change, as in the case of the Amalekites. Forgiving Israel throughout its history. Jesus paying the debt of sin for humanity.

The same passage that calls God merciful also states that He "does not let the guilty go unpunished". Examples include... Punishing wicked nations, such as the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Punishing Israel, such as the Babylonian captivity, as a form of "loving correction" rather than purely vengeful wrath.

The Bible notes that punishing the wicked is a "strange act" and that God takes no pleasure in it. God's punitive side is a result of His justice, while His mercy is shown through sparing people from the punishment they deserve.

Many theologians interpret these punitive actions as redemptive, disciplinary, or a way to halt injustice. Ultimately, the Bible argues that mercy triumphs over judgment.

You only agree with AI because it reinforces your bias. Is God always merciful or just predominantly merciful?

Couldn't I say the same about you? Because you are missing the point. The Bible itself is biased to show God as merciful instead of punitive. You looked past that bias and inserted your own. AI didn't do that.

 

[alang1216]

According to AI... the Bible is considered to be a massive, complex, and unique collection of information, spanning 66 to 81 books (depending on version) covering history, poetry, prophecy, and theology. It is the most printed, translated, and distributed book in human history, with over 5 billion copies in circulation, providing significant documentation on ancient culture.

The Bible is relatively tiny compared to modern AI training datasets. While a complete Bible contains roughly 750,000 to 800,000 words (about of raw text), major AI models like GPT-4 or Llama 3 are trained on trillions of words.

To put it in perspective, the entire Bible would represent only a fraction of a percent of the data used in a single, major AI training run.

The Comparison

• The Bible: Approximately words or 1 million tokens.
  
  
• Modern AI Dataset (e.g., Llama 3.1): ~15 trillion tokens (approximately 11 trillion words).
  YouTube +2

If the Bible were a single page in a book, the training data for a large AI model would be a stack of books rising higher than the Eiffel Tower.

The logic was this:
The Bible presents God as possessing both mercy and punitive (judgmental) attributes, often describing them as working together rather than in opposition. Although the Old Testament is often associated with God's punishment, it mentions God's mercy over four times as much as the New Testament.

The Bible describes God as "merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and plenteous in mercy". Examples of mercy include... Holding back judgment to allow time for change, as in the case of the Amalekites. Forgiving Israel throughout its history. Jesus paying the debt of sin for humanity.

The same passage that calls God merciful also states that He "does not let the guilty go unpunished". Examples include... Punishing wicked nations, such as the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Punishing Israel, such as the Babylonian captivity, as a form of "loving correction" rather than purely vengeful wrath.

The Bible notes that punishing the wicked is a "strange act" and that God takes no pleasure in it. God's punitive side is a result of His justice, while His mercy is shown through sparing people from the punishment they deserve.

Many theologians interpret these punitive actions as redemptive, disciplinary, or a way to halt injustice. Ultimately, the Bible argues that mercy triumphs over judgment.

Of course, the instances where God punishes the innocent, are embellishments, not history. Got it.

Couldn't I say the same about you? Because you are missing the point. The Bible itself is biased to show God as merciful instead of punitive. You looked past that bias and inserted your own. AI didn't do that.

Is God always merciful or just predominantly merciful?

 

[ding]

The Bible is relatively tiny compared to modern AI training datasets. While a complete Bible contains roughly 750,000 to 800,000 words (about of raw text), major AI models like GPT-4 or Llama 3 are trained on trillions of words.

To put it in perspective, the entire Bible would represent only a fraction of a percent of the data used in a single, major AI training run.

The Comparison

• The Bible: Approximately words or 1 million tokens.
  
  
• Modern AI Dataset (e.g., Llama 3.1): ~15 trillion tokens (approximately 11 trillion words).
  YouTube +2

If the Bible were a single page in a book, the training data for a large AI model would be a stack of books rising higher than the Eiffel Tower.

How long does it take for you to read the bible? Compare AI to you.

For the average adult, reading 800,000 words takes approximately 53 to 67 hours of continuous reading.
Since most people don't read for dozens of hours straight, this would typically span several weeks or months of consistent daily reading. For context, 800,000 words is roughly the length of the entire Harry Potter series (which is about 1,084,000 words) or roughly eight to ten standard-length novels.

It takes modern AI models (like Claude 3 or GPT-4) approximately 1 to 3 minutes to read, process, and analyze 800,000 words.

Of course, the instances where God punishes the innocent, are embellishments, not history. Got it.

Let's walk through an example together. Pick one.

Is God always merciful or just predominantly merciful?

You tell me. You're the one who thinks God isn't merciful at all, right?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I asked a Muslim friend about the US making Sharia Law the law of the land. He said he didn't care either way since his family already lived by it. He wouldn't cut off anyone's hand any more than a Christian or Jew would stone an adulterer.

If his family is living by Sharia law, that means he believes women are worth less than men.

Why do you despise liberalism like you do?

 

[alang1216]

How long does it take for you to read the bible? Compare AI to you.

Your point?

Let's walk through an example together. Pick one.

How about the plague from David's census? Not very merciful to the 70,000 innocents. The Bible notes this as a "hard question" (2 Samuel 24:17), which David himself asked, noting that he, not the people, had sinned.

You tell me. You're the one who thinks God isn't merciful at all, right?

Another of your inventions, I don't recall ever saying any such thing since it is obviously untrue.

 

[alang1216]

If his family is living by Sharia law, that means he believes women are worth less than men.

Why do you despise liberalism like you do?

I'm not a Muslim but I grew up in a house that believed women are worth less than men. Not at all uncommon as I recall and still reflected in our society today.