I provided a plethora of scriptural support. Perhaps you don't accept God's words.
You’re a good guy, K9Buck, as Christians are generally. My brothers and sisters. Their approaches to the Bible, though, are very personal and subjective. One of the misguided ways they approach it is to proof-text it to satisfy their preconceptions. They cite chapters and verses, and never the cultural or historical contexts.
For example, off the top of your head, can you answer these questions? Who were the Galatians? Why did Paul write to them? In what other chapters of the New Testament besides Galatians do the Galatians appear?
Using Aristotelian logic,
Protestant Scholastics of the Reformation posited that every syllable of the Scriptures is the Word of God in and of itself, regardless of context. As a result, students of scripture could pull a verse from the Bible to use as proof of a doctrine or a practice. Ultimately, people were making the Bible say whatever they wanted it to say.
Very few people read Genesis through Revelation as a single, connected history of an ancient Near Eastern people.
What’s worse is that the Epistles are one-sided. We don’t have the correspondences that they were addressing. From their knowledge of the times and places, scholars can reconstruct at great measure the circumstances which prompted the Epistles, but most Christians don’t even bother to consider the other side of the correspondences.
I beg to differ with you. You didn’t actually provide support. You provided proof-texts.