Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl >>> NOT GUILTY.

[Obiwan]

And Starkey....

How have I lied? By confirming that those Taliban were high-ranking (confirmed by a liberal source)?

Or that the backlash for Obama is due to Obama making a bad trade (also confirmed by a Liberal source)?

Or is it by questioning when Obama started taking orders from the Republicans?

 

[JakeStarkey]

obi, you have been here a week, and such as a noob you know very little about how the Board works and its members. I made a statement, you said it was wrong, I gave you the proof, and you have been waffling and lying and deflecting ever since.

The fact is that the far right thugs (of which you are one) would have crucified Obama if he had not brought Bergdahl home. Fact.

The five exchanged for Bergdahl are not "generals" and have been out of the game for a very long time.

Bergdahl is going to court martial, and, hopefully, justice will be served.

 

[Obiwan]

Starkey

I can understand your frustration. Even if those Taliban weren't field commanders, I was able to prove they were certainly high ranking.

And they might have had some downtime, but three have already been caught trying to get back into the fight.

Now can we have that link proving that the outcry from the right for Obama's bad trade was deafening , like BlackSand requested? You can even use a liberal source, as long as it's credible.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are the one frustrated, obi.

You were caught out and have been scrambling since.

The sources were given above so, no, you don't get "just once more" on this, not ever.

 

[Obiwan]

Starkey

I was able to prove that the outcry was over Obama' s bad trade.

You were asked to provide a link proving the right would have crucified Obama for not making it, and could not.

And last time I checked, Obama doesn't care what the Republicans think. As a matter of fact, he doesn't even care what the Democrats who want to have a chance to have some input in that deal with Iran think, does he? So your assertion that "the Republicans made him do it" doesn't wash, and is in fact immaterial. Obama made the decision to make the bad deal on his own.

 

[Obiwan]

And Starkey?

The link I provided from the Huffington Post (which is liberal) even stated that one problem with Obama's deal was that he did not consult with Congress on it, as required by law. So Obama is on his own on that one. He screwed the pooch, even according to the liberal media.

 

[Obiwan]

Starkey

OK, let's accept the premise that the Republicans wanted to get Bergdahl back too. Did Obama even consider other ways to do it, such as a raid by a Seal Team? If he did, please provide the link.

Otherwise, simply accept the fact that Obama used Bergdahl as an excuse to release five high ranking Taliban, and he did that all on his own.

Accept the facts and move on, before you look even more foolish.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Jakemalarkey once again runs to defend Obama and once again proves he is not a Republican. Everyone right of center is a far right thug according to jakemalarkey.

 

[Obiwan]

Starkey

You opened the discussion of the circumstances surrounding the trade for Bergdahl, making it fair game. At least have the intellectual honesty to address my questions.

And saying we couldn't find him might be a stretch. If Obama can find all of those terrorists for drone strikes, he should realize that one white dude hanging out with the Taliban for five years should kind of stand out, don't you think?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Starkey

OK, let's accept the premise that the Republicans wanted to get Bergdahl back too. Did Obama even consider other ways to do it, such as a raid by a Seal Team? If he did, please provide the link.

Otherwise, simply accept the fact that Obama used Bergdahl as an excuse to release five high ranking Taliban, and he did that all on his own.

Accept the facts and move on, before you look even more foolish.

Finally, you admit the main point. Then you try to make your earlier deflections as exculpatory of your silliness. The reasons were never the point; you brought them up in deflection.

You can keep the egg on your face.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jakemalarkey once again runs to defend Obama and once again proves he is not a Republican. Everyone right of center is a far right thug according to jakemalarkey.

You are a racialist and not a Republican, so we know the worth not to give to your comments.

Noting the the GOP would have crucified BHO if he had not brought home Bergdahl brings sanity to the discussion and excludes the far right from mainstream Republicanism. That is exactly what is happening in Indiana now as well: the far right being marginalized in decision making - watch that law change almost immediately..

 

[Obiwan]

Starkey

Answer my question. Or do you admit you have no answer?

That leaves egg on your face, and your refusal to answer proves that you are only an apologist for Obama.

 

[Obiwan]

And Starkey

Your attempts at deflection by bringing something that actually had no bearing on Obama's decision into the equation merely demonstrates your partisan politics and your attempts to avoid the real issue, which is that Obama made a bad deal to get Bergdahl back. Think that could be the reason your feeble attempts to defend Obama's actions weren't even taken seriously to begin with?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Jakemalarkey once again runs to defend Obama and once again proves he is not a Republican. Everyone right of center is a far right thug according to jakemalarkey.

You are a racialist and not a Republican, so we know the worth not to give to your comments.

Noting the the GOP would have crucified BHO if he had not brought home Bergdahl brings sanity to the discussion and excludes the far right from mainstream Republicanism. That is exactly what is happening in Indiana now as well: the far right being marginalized in decision making - watch that law change almost immediately..

Once again my retarded friend, I have never claimed to be a Republican.

"Would have". That is all you got. I counter that silly argument with, they would have not.

 

[Obiwan]

Starkey

I don't think the Republicans would have crucified Obama for not releasing those terrorists at all.

However, deciding to release them on his own, without consulting Congress, seems to have stirred up a hornet's nest, hasn't it?

 

[JakeStarkey]

obi's questions are meaningless, and what he thinks not much more. He admitted that I was right. Finally. Lonestar is a racialist and beneath contempt. Always.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

obi's questions are meaningless, and what he thinks not much more. He admitted that I was right. Finally. Lonestar is a racialist and beneath contempt. Always.

Spoken like a true liberal.

 

[JakeStarkey]

obi's questions are meaningless, and what he thinks not much more. He admitted that I was right. Finally. Lonestar is a racialist and beneath contempt. Always.

Spoken like a true liberal.

Like a true American, whether conservative, centrist, liberal. The Lonestars and their racialism are despised by the great majority of America.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

obi's questions are meaningless, and what he thinks not much more. He admitted that I was right. Finally. Lonestar is a racialist and beneath contempt. Always.

Spoken like a true liberal.

Like a true American, whether conservative, centrist, liberal. The Lonestars and their racialism are despised by the great majority of America.

Who gave you the authority to speak for the great majority?

 

[Obiwan]

Starkey

You are still avoiding the issue that Obama made a bad trade, and he did it on his own, without consulting Congress. The Republicans had nothing to do with that, so your argument there is meaningless.

You also have refused to address the fact that Obama had other options open to him, which he failed to pursue, or apparently, even didn't even bother to consider.

And you say Obama's idiocy is the Republicans' fault, so you won, based on your own flawed logic?

Are you sure you don't need help with your mental health? Or are you just exhibiting "liberal values"?