Actually, he did nothing of the sort. His percentage of the vote hovered within the same range as Bush Jr., McCain, and Romney. he didn't really attract that many "disgusted Democrats". He probably attracted some people who are non-aligned because we are a very stupid country that mistakes celebrity for merit. But to claim he moved the needle all that much is silly.
Nope. First, I doubt Trump is going to live through this term, just look at the man, he looks horrible even after they slather the makeup on him. But on the off chance he does, after the impending Great Depression II, the Republican Brand will be dirt.
You mean after Trump is gone, the GOP will take the wreckage and try to salvage... something. But Americans will look back at Trump in shame and horror, not pride.
The main reason why the GOP has been able to survive is it's ability to distance itself from Toxic figures, such as Nixon or McCarthy. Will it be able to do so with Trump?
yeah, he gets results.
View attachment 1172510
First, the main reason why the border "Dried up" was that it was already declining before he got there. We went from a height of 250K Crossings in 2023 to 100K in January 2025 when Biden left. So it really didn't have anything to do with Trump.
Um, nope. You've been lied to.
pnhp.org
Our telephone survey of likely U.S. providers of wait-listed services such as advanced imaging and eye procedures strongly suggested that very few Canadians sought care for these services south of the border. Relative to the large volume of these procedures provided to Canadians within adjacent provinces, the numbers are almost undetectable. Hospital administrative data from states bordering Canadian population centers reinforce this picture. State inpatient discharge data show that most Canadian admissions to these hospitals were unrelated to waiting time or to leading-edge-technology scenarios commonly associated with cross- border care-seeking arguments. The vast majority of services provided to Canadians were emergency or urgent care, presumably coincidental with travel to the United States for other purposes. They were clearly unrelated either to advanced technologies or to waiting times north of the border. This is consistent with the findings from our previous study in Ontario of provincial plan records of reimbursement for out-of-country use of care. Additional findings from the current study showed that a small amount of cross-border use was related to proximal services, primarily in rural or remote areas where provincial payers have made arrangements to reimburse nearby U.S. providers. Finally, information from a sample of “America’s Best Hospitals” revealed very few Canadians being seen for the magnet referral services they provide.
