Senate Impeachment Trial Thread.

[Siete]

a minority of Trumpdrones aka Russians portray the opposite of the reality of the trial -

go figure -

The fact that you referenced 'Russians' shows you snowflajes are losing your damn minds as the House's Coup Dream Team are getting their asses handed to them for admitting they voted to Impeach the President despite not having any evidence.

yeah sure, anything you say Nikita -

 

[Lakhota]

SENATE BLOCKS NEW DOCS — PARTY LINE VOTE

Not a surprise! SHAM trial.

 

[Dick Foster]

I'm on to their plan now. They're trying to put everyone to sleep and once everyone doses off they're gonna pull a fast one.
They have some dumb black ***** up there right now boring everyone out of their friggin skulls. I've heard kids in grammar school do a better job of reading something aloud. I'd guess her IQ at about 80-85. She's a demodumbass from Florida.

 

[Nostra]

Might as well get this one started.

It's clear from today's pressers by the Dimwingers what their strategy is...........attack the process as unfair, call it a 'rigged' trial even before it starts. (confirmed the prediction in my sig)

They are whining and crying that this isn't like the Clinton impeachment, which is a blatant lie.

No new evidence was brought into the trial during the trial. All evidence was put together prior to the start of the Clinton trial.

Not a single witness was called and testified in public. Only 3 witnesses were called, and they testified in secret. The Dimwingers selectively leaked what they wanted to, and kept the rest secret.

In short, Dimwingers know they have no case despite claiming they have a slame dunk. It is hysterical that they don't know thinking Americans are laughing at their sham.

Cryin' Chucky will now offer up multiple dumbfuck resolutions he knows will go nowhere..........then he will run in front of the cameras to whine and cry about fairness.

How did I know this day would come? I called it in 2016, as soon as the mo'fo won.
And John Kelly told him he was going to be impeached, too.

The day House Dimwingers made fools of themselves in the Senate?

 

[Nostra]

The Dems are in effect admitting they didn't have sufficient evidence to impeach Trump. Overwhelming evidence they said they had, right? So where the **** is it, and why do you need more? The Dems have made a mockery of what is supposed to be a very serious matter, we're talking about overturning a duly elected president by the will of the people according to the laws of the land. The fact that now they want more witnesses and data is clearly indicating that they didn't have overwhelming evidence, indeed not even sufficient evidence to impeach a sitting president. It's not illegal, but every one of those assholes ought to be voted out of office IMHO.

It ought to be obvious, you don't go to trial with a case that you can't win. You don't go to trial until you have sufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that this is a political trial as opposed to a criminal one does not change that requirement one bit.

Another TDS: Trump Denial Syndrome victim.
Impeachment is not part of the "laws of the land".
They don't want more witnesses.
They want the witnesses to TESTIFY you stupid flaming ****.

They don't want more witnesses.

Then why did Pencil Neck Schifferbrains try to call Bolton and Mulvaney instead of his hearsay witnesses, Halfwit?

 

[Nostra]

a minority of Trumpdrones aka Russians portray the opposite of the reality of the trial -

go figure -

The fact that you referenced 'Russians' shows you snowflajes are losing your damn minds as the House's Coup Dream Team are getting their asses handed to them for admitting they voted to Impeach the President despite not having any evidence.

Minor loss for him.

 

[Lakhota]

Barr Once Contradicted Trump’s Claim That Abuse of Power Is Not Impeachable

During the Russia inquiry, Attorney General William Barr wrote in a memo that presidents who misuse their authority are subject to impeachment.

So, Barr has also flip-flopped.

 

[Nostra]

Cryin' Chucky Bitchslap #2 just issued.

Poor Chucky.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Nostra]

How many witnesses testified publicly during the Clinton trial?

Zero sound about right?

Next?

 

[Lakhota]

How many witnesses testified publicly during the Clinton trial?

Zero sound about right?

Next?

Wrong. Google it...

BTW, blowjobs and treason are two different things.

 

[Nostra]

How many witnesses testified publicly during the Clinton trial?

Zero sound about right?

Next?

Wrong. Google it...

BTW, blowjobs and treason are two different things.

I don't do homework for crayon eating morons.

YOU google it and bring the list of witnesses that testified publicly during the Clinton impeachment trial.

This is where you tuck tail and go hide, idiot.

 

[JustAGuy1]

53 Republicans voted to support McConnell's effort to suppress evidence. This is the first win of many battles goes & for The President.

We an expect every vote to provide evidence to lose 53 - 47 and, potentially, lead to a kangaroo trial.

If so Trump will pump his chest and claim he is innocent, but that will not be the last word. The evidence and the truth will
come out, and the public opinion will decide if The President deserves a second term.

Tabling an Amendment which is an attempt to CHANGE ALREADY agreed upon Rules, you lying SACK OF SCHIFF, is not "Suppressing Evidence"! Get the Hell out of our thread and don't come back Troll. Pay attention Baal Worshipper, The President is going to be elected in a Landslide, no thanks to him, but to YOU. Now get the Hell out of our thread.

How's the weather in Moscow today, Tree? If must be damn cold this time outside the Kremlin.

You do know your side has no say in what the Senate does, right? Your pigs got their way in the House because that's what the Constitution says. Well, that's what happening now. You pricks screamed that you had OVERWHELMING evidence to impeach him. Well now you get to watch. The Constitution delegates the power of trying what the House voted. Stop whining whenever the rules don't let you get your way.

 

[JustAGuy1]

The Dems are in effect admitting they didn't have sufficient evidence to impeach Trump. Overwhelming evidence they said they had, right? So where the **** is it, and why do you need more? The Dems have made a mockery of what is supposed to be a very serious matter, we're talking about overturning a duly elected president by the will of the people according to the laws of the land. The fact that now they want more witnesses and data is clearly indicating that they didn't have overwhelming evidence, indeed not even sufficient evidence to impeach a sitting president. It's not illegal, but every one of those assholes ought to be voted out of office IMHO.

It ought to be obvious, you don't go to trial with a case that you can't win. You don't go to trial until you have sufficient evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and the fact that this is a political trial as opposed to a criminal one does not change that requirement one bit.

Another TDS: Trump Denial Syndrome victim.
Impeachment is not part of the "laws of the land".
They don't want more witnesses.
They want the witnesses to TESTIFY you stupid flaming ****.

Not the way it's done old boy. There is no need for the "witnesses" they used impeach him to "testify" again.

 

[easyt65]

The House Democrats Impeached the President based on a case that was put together and a decision based on that case.

So why can't the Democrats present that case and provide the justification of why they voted to Impeachment the President?

So far the Democrats have declared to the world before the Senate they can not present a case for Impeachment - which they already voted for - because THEY DON'T HAVE EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY / SUPPORT IMPEACHMENT.

 

[Dr Grump]

You do know your side has no say in what the Senate does, right? Your pigs got their way in the House because that's what the Constitution says. Well, that's what happening now. You pricks screamed that you had OVERWHELMING evidence to impeach him. Well now you get to watch. The Constitution delegates the power of trying what the House voted. Stop whining whenever the rules don't let you get your way.

And if the Senate doesn't allow the evidence to be presented? When it comes to actual voting, Dems have the higher ground. They will be voting on the evidence. The Repugs are voting on party lines. Simple really.

It's a sham. But interesting to watch anyway.

This is why the US is the laughing stock of the world.

And to think there is a thread here spouting how it is supposed to be the greatest country in the world. Laughable.

 

[easyt65]

BTW, blowjobs and treason are two different things.

Are you STILL stuck on the lie that Clinton was Impeached because of an affair, instead of him being found guilty of Contempt of Court by attempting to unethically con a judge and jury through misleading testimony, for which he was stripped of his license to practice law?!

You do realize there is a difference between Impeachment based on baseless accusations and ones supported by actual evidence, right?

If not, you need to ACTUALLY watch the House Coup Managers humiliate themselves by admitting they voted to Impeach the President without having any evidence.

 

[easyt65]

And if the Senate doesn't allow the evidence to be presented? When it comes to actual voting, Dems have the higher ground. They will be voting on the evidence. The Repugs are voting on party lines. Simple really.

I don't know what you are watching, but it isn't the live Senate hearing on Impeachment.

The Democrats have openly declared they are not prepared to present the case / justification for their vote to Impeach the President, that they are not prepared to explain why they voted to Impeach the President in the House because they DON'T HAVE THE EVIDENCE TO DO SO.

They are literally BEGGING the Senate to allow them to continue to investigate and try to find evidence that will provide the justification for them having ALREADY voted to Impeach the President...

.

 

[JustAGuy1]

You do know your side has no say in what the Senate does, right? Your pigs got their way in the House because that's what the Constitution says. Well, that's what happening now. You pricks screamed that you had OVERWHELMING evidence to impeach him. Well now you get to watch. The Constitution delegates the power of trying what the House voted. Stop whining whenever the rules don't let you get your way.

And if the Senate doesn't allow the evidence to be presented? When it comes to actual voting, Dems have the higher ground. They will be voting on the evidence. The Repugs are voting on party lines. Simple really.

It's a sham. But interesting to watch anyway.

This is why the US is the laughing stock of the world.

And to think there is a thread here spouting how it is supposed to be the greatest country in the world. Laughable.

The Dems made their own bed, they can lie in it. The purpose of the Senate is to judge the case the Dems put together. THEY screamed it was overwhelming evidence so there is no need to add to what they did. Sorry, the Dems want their way in every area. Tough shit.

 

[The Original Tree]

I disagree. The Forefathers would execute Pelosi Schiff and Nadler.

We an expect every vote to provide evidence to lose 53 - 47 and, potentially, lead to a kangaroo trial.

If so Trump will pump his chest and claim he is innocent, but that will not be the last word. The evidence and the truth will come out, and the public opinion will decide if The President deserves a second term.

News flash, snowflake:

AMERICANS ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!

WHEN the House traitors drag their sorry asses back to the House after the Senate dismisses their exposed political coup attempt, Trump will be CONFIRMED 'Innocent'.

Don't blame the President for the Democrats putting on display their criminal incompetence & treason, showing up to the Senate - AFTER voting for Impeachment - and declaring they can't present their case because they don't have the evidence to Justify Impeaching the President.

If the Founding Fathers were still alive - after this display put on by the House Impeachment managers, the only way they would leave the Senate would be in handcuffs.